Best Hiking Boots of 2025
ByMultiple Authors
Updated:
Jun 10, 2025Table of contents
Merrell Moab Speed 2 Mid GTX ($180)
Hoka Kaha 3 GTX ($240)
Merrell Moab 3 Mid Waterproof ($150)
Lowa Renegade Evo GTX Mid ($280)
Hoka Kaha 3 GTX ($240)
Altra Olympus 6 Hike Mid GTX ($220)
La Sportiva Ultra Raptor II Mid Leather GTX ($199)
Danner Mountain 600 Leaf GTX ($220)
Merrell goes modern with the Moab Speed 2, combining lightweight design, plush cushioning, and unexpectedly strong support. You sacrifice some protection and durability, but it’s hard to beat this boot’s comfortable and athletic feel.
Merrell goes modern with the Moab Speed 2, combining lightweight design, plush cushioning, and unexpectedly strong support. You sacrifice some protection and durability, but it’s hard to beat this boot’s comfortable and athletic feel.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Terrain
Moderate/easy
Weight
1 lb. 12.2 oz.
Waterproof
Yes
Upper
Synthetic
Pros
Cons
With a lighter and more svelte build than the classic Moab, Merrell is leaning into the modern trends. At just over 1 pound 12 ounces, the Speed 2 Mid is one the lightest hiking boots in this gear guide yet still manages to flex its performance chops. We found the Speed to be comfortable with little break-in required, surprisingly supportive (the lacing system does a great job at helping you tighten down the boot to your liking), and grippy, even over wet rock. In addition, you get Gore-Tex waterproofing, which is a step up from Merrell’s in-house version found on the Moab. For those looking to move fast and light without a whole lot of compromises, the Speed 2 is a nice option.
Hiking boots made with lightweight, synthetic materials often come with decreased durability, and the Merrell Moab Speed 2 Mid GTX unfortunately is no exception. In our testing, by around the 50-mile mark the softer outer cushion had parts tearing off, the suede detail on the sides of the boot was piling, and the edges of the outer lugs on the outsole were wearing down and rounding out. For a $180 boot, we were disappointed by how quickly they began to show signs of wear, although these issues were mostly cosmetic. And a final consideration is that the Speed 2 Mid is not the most protective hiking boot out there—the minimal nature and upper means that you can definitely feel rocks and other debris if they hit the side of your foot.
But enough with the negativity—the Moab Speed 2 Mid GTX is objectively a great hiking boot, as long as it suits your needs. It’s well-constructed, features premium materials from Gore-Tex and Vibram, and is more stable underfoot than its trail-runner vibe would suggest. The Speed’s ideal match is the hiker who values low weight and nimbleness over protection and durability but still wants a mid-height collar for that added boost in support (otherwise, we’d recommend the low-top version). For more, see our review of the Merrell Moab Speed 2 GTX.
If comfort is your end all and be all but you want the stability to back it up, the Kaha 3 is a strong candidate. A premium Vibram Megagrip outsole and Gore-tex membrane round out the list of high-end features. However, it’s not a weight leader.
If comfort is your end all and be all but you want the stability to back it up, the Kaha 3 is a strong candidate. A premium Vibram Megagrip outsole and Gore-tex membrane round out the list of high-end features. However, it’s not a weight leader.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Terrain
Moderate
Weight
2 lb. 8 oz.
Waterproof
Yes
Upper
Leather
Pros
Cons
Hoka footwear stands out for its max cushioning and often loud colorways. Its low-top Speedgoat is in its sixth iteration and omnipresent among trail runners and the fast-and-light crowd, but Hoka has more recently moved into proper hiking footwear, including the Kaha. Sitting atop the brand’s boot collection, the Kaha 3 Mid doesn’t hide its comfort focus, with a prominent, tall midsole, soft collar, and heavy cushioning throughout. In addition to a plush ride, the Kaha also features better support than you’d expect from a max-cushioned boot, thanks to its wide footbed, secure lacing system, and moderately rigid midsole. And underfoot, the Vibram Megagrip outsole offers excellent traction on a variety of terrain and is particularly adept on rock.
The Kaha 2 was a popular boot, and Hoka released this latest generation for spring 2025. Our tester, Jude, has worn both versions and immediately called out some differences, noting: “Visually, the Hoka Kaha 3 looks sleeker and more refined than the Kaha 2—the upper has fewer bulky overlays and a smoother silhouette that feels a little more modern and streamlined. The design still clearly reads as a Hoka, but the Kaha 3 loses some of that exaggerated “moon boot” vibe the Kaha 2 had.” Performance on the trail hasn’t changed dramatically, but Jude noted the boot feels slightly firmer underfoot (a win for hauling heavy packs), and its upgraded leather upper is of higher quality and holding up great in testing thus far.
The unique design of the Hoka Kaha 3—complete with an extended heel and rockered shape—does have its shortcomings. Our tester found the boot difficult to trust on loose terrain or sections that required precise footing—the tall stack height left him feeling teetery and disconnected to the ground. And at 2 pounds 8 ounces, the Kaha is nowhere near as light as you might expect from a Hoka. All told, if you place comfort at the helm, don’t mind a modern aesthetic, and are looking for a true-blue hiking boot from Hoka, the Kaha 3 GTX is well worth a closer look. For more, see our review of the Hoka Kaha 3.
The Moab isn’t the sleekest-looking or burliest hiking boot out there, but it’s a solid all-rounder for most trail types and conditions. Throw in a very reasonable price, and it’s for good reason it’s been a best-seller for years.
The Moab isn’t the sleekest-looking or burliest hiking boot out there, but it’s a solid all-rounder for most trail types and conditions. Throw in a very reasonable price, and it’s for good reason it’s been a best-seller for years.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Terrain
Moderate/easy
Weight
2 lb. 2.9 oz.
Waterproof
Yes (non-WP available)
Upper
Leather/synthetic
Pros
Cons
The truth is that most hikers stick to moderate or easy trails, might not be comfortable in a lightweight hiking shoe or trail runner, and don’t need an expensive tank of a boot for carrying a super heavy pack or moving through extreme conditions. If this sounds like you, the Merrell Moab 3 Mid is one the most reliable and versatile hiking boots on the market, at an attractive price point.
In the field, the Moab is comfortable, reasonably light at under 2 pounds, stable, and grippy over most surfaces. Our tester found that it was a champ over steep terrain and even muddy conditions, although it struggled on wet rock. For waterproofing, Merrell’s in-house membrane got the job done in snow, rain, and puddles, but can’t match Gore-Tex’s breathability (the Moab does come in a non-waterproof version for those interested). In terms of protection, the Moab is solid: the toe protection and sides of the boot are substantial and we experienced no pain when hitting rocks or tree roots head-on or from the side. Last but not least, the Moabs are surprisingly durable, especially given the relatively low price point.
All in all, the Merrell Moab Mid 3 is a versatile hiking boot and a great value option for day hiking and shorter backpacking trips. If you are prone to rolling your ankles or routinely carry a heavy pack, there are more supportive boots than this mid-height cut offers. But based on key considerations like comfort, overall performance, and price, there is good reason why the Moab has been such a popular all-rounder for years. For more, read our review of the Merrell Moab 3 Mid.
The Renegade isn’t the lightest boot out there and has a classic leather design, but remains comfortable and highly capable. For challenging day hikes and backpacking, it’s a practical choice.
The Renegade isn’t the lightest boot out there and has a classic leather design, but remains comfortable and highly capable. For challenging day hikes and backpacking, it’s a practical choice.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Terrain
Moderate/rugged
Weight
2 lb. 9.6 oz.
Waterproof
Yes
Upper
Leather
Pros
Cons
The Lowa Renegade has been one of the most popular hiking boots on the market for years, and it’s easy to see why. That said, if you’re looking for a lightweight boot that feels more like a trail runner, this isn’t it. Weighing in at 2 pounds 9.6 ounces per pair, the Renegade has a traditional build with burly materials and a more structured feel. But for those who value support and stability, it’s one of the most capable and protective boots in its class, ideal for rugged day hikes and multi-day backpacking trips.
We’ve put the Renegade through its paces with a range of testers and received mixed feedback, mostly centered around comfort. On a steep, rocky trek through Arctic Norway, our tester appreciated how stable and confidence-inspiring the boot felt, especially under a heavy pack. Even after long days, he had no urge to rip them off at camp. On the flip side, another tester developed hot spots and pinky-toe blisters during early wear-in and noted that she prefers lighter, more flexible footwear. Ultimately, comfort may depend on your footwear background: fans of traditional leather boots will feel right at home, while those used to trail runners may face a steeper adjustment.
Still, there’s a lot to love here. The Renegade is impressively durable, reliably waterproof, and thoughtfully constructed with premium materials. It’s not the best pick for short hikes or ultralight missions, but if you’re heading into technical terrain or carrying serious weight, this boot is built to handle it—and built to last. For more, see our review of the Lowa Renegade Evo GTX.
Altra took its max-cushioned trail runner and gave it a hiking treatment, adding a mid-height collar, Gore-Tex waterproofing, and a premium leather upper. The result is a very plush ride for high-mileage days and enough performance chops to handle rocky, mountainous terrain. Just make sure you like the zero-drop experience.
Altra took its max-cushioned trail runner and gave it a hiking treatment, adding a mid-height collar, Gore-Tex waterproofing, and a premium leather upper. The result is a very plush ride for high-mileage days and enough performance chops to handle rocky, mountainous terrain. Just make sure you like the zero-drop experience.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Terrain
Easy/moderate
Weight
2 lb. 5.2 oz.
Waterproof
Yes
Upper
Leather
Pros
Cons
For all-day comfort, check out the Altra Olympus 6 Hike Mid GTX. This boot features Altra’s trademark zero drop and roomy toe box, but tacks on a plush foam midsole to minimize impact and keep feet happy during long days on the trail. It’s a lot more cushion than we see in any other boot here—similar to that of a max-cushioned running shoe—but the Olympus Hike pulls it off and the result is a very comfortable ride, alongside surprisingly good performance chops.
The Olympus Hike Mid is made with a laundry list of premium materials: The Vibram Megagrip outsole offers impressive grip in all types of terrain, making the Olympus a confidence-inspiring boot to wear on everything from smooth trail to talus fields. In terms of breathable waterproofing, the Gore-Tex membrane is about as good as it gets. Last but not least, the Olympus Hike Mid features a leather upper (Altra’s standard Olympus running shoe uses mesh instead), which goes a long way toward improving the boot’s lifespan. But while the Olympus Mid will have a longer life than many synthetic hiking boots, it’s far from our first choice for those looking for a highly durable boot—the lightweight materials will abrade over time, and the exposed foam will quickly show signs of wear.
Our tester Steffen usually prefers stiffer hiking boots for the added ankle support, so he was initially skeptical about the more flexible Olympus Hike Mid. But after wearing it for over 100 miles, he noted his surprise with how stable the boot felt, thanks to the solid lacing and added collar cushioning that holds his ankle in place. All told, it’s a big upgrade from a boot like the Lone Peak Hiker, with a stable, planted feel alongside much improved traction and cushion—although at over 11 ounces more, you’ll certainly feel the added heft. If you don’t mind the zero drop experience, it’s a suitable choice for everything from high-mileage days on easy trail to cross-country travel above treeline. For more, read our review of the Altra Olympus 6 Hike Mid GTX.
The Ultra Raptor is a nimble, lightweight hiking boot that blends the agility of a mountain running shoe with the durability of a leather upper and ankle support. While it excels on technical terrain on the foot of the right pilot, its flexible build and minimal cushioning may feel lacking for those accustomed to more structured leather boots.
The Ultra Raptor is a nimble, lightweight hiking boot that blends the agility of a mountain running shoe with the durability of a leather upper and ankle support. While it excels on technical terrain on the foot of the right pilot, its flexible build and minimal cushioning may feel lacking for those accustomed to more structured leather boots.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Terrain
Moderate/rugged
Weight
2 lb.
Waterproof
Yes
Upper
Leather
Pros
Cons
Not all hiking boots are created equal, and the La Sportiva Ultra Raptor II Mid Leather is a niche design with a distinct purpose. First, let’s start with what it’s not. It isn’t a particularly protective boot, its narrow fit leaves little room for toe splay, and it lacks the plush underfoot cushioning found in many modern models. Despite its "leather hiking boot" designation, it feels worlds apart from a burly, supportive option like the Lowa Renegade Evo. Instead, the Ultra Raptor is best thought of as a trail running shoe with above-the-ankle support, an impressively grippy outsole, and a durable leather upper for added longevity.
Where the Ultra Raptor truly excels is on rocky, technical terrain. We tested the boot on obscure routes around El Chaltén in Southern Patagonia, and it proved to be the perfect tool for fast-paced, off-trail scrambling. It felt nimble and responsive, whether picking through boulder fields, speeding down rocky descents, or crossing creeks with precision. This was in noticeable contrast to a burlier hiking boot we were also testing (The North Face’s Offtrail Hike LT Mid GTX), which by comparison was heavy, cumbersome, and tank-like.
All in all, the Ultra Raptor II Mid Leather is best for hikers who want the agility of a trail runner with just enough ankle support and durability for rugged conditions. However, it lacks the plush cushioning and load-bearing stability of a more traditional leather hiking boot, making it less ideal for long-mileage days with a heavy pack. And with its notably narrow fit, it’s not a good match for those who need extra room in the toe box. For more, read our La Sportiva Ultra Raptor II Mid Leather GTX review.
Yes, this boot is cool on the outside, but it has real performance chops to back it up. With impressive comfort, stability, and grip at a reasonable weight, there is a lot to like about the 600 Leaf.
Yes, this boot is cool on the outside, but it has real performance chops to back it up. With impressive comfort, stability, and grip at a reasonable weight, there is a lot to like about the 600 Leaf.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Terrain
Moderate
Weight
2 lb. 4 oz.
Waterproof
Yes
Upper
Leather
Pros
Cons
Danner is a relative newcomer to the hiking boot game, only truly hitting the scene over the last handful of years. With retro-meets-hipster looks, they—rightfully or not—have been labeled by some as “influencer” or “instagrammer” boots. But we’ll come right out and argue for their performance chops: we took the Danner Mountain 600 Leaf on a five-night backpacking trip traversing off-trail through Colorado’s rugged Weminuche Wilderness, including rocky talus passes, scree fields, extended bushwacking, swampy willows, and general exploration of 13,000-foot peaks and cirques. The result? Our tester personally had never experienced a boot so comfortable under such conditions.
It’s important to note that Danners are not known for their underfoot cushioning, and the Mountain 600 Leaf is no exception. We would describe these boots as having medium cushion at best, and they can feel a bit flat if you are used to ultra-plush footwear. In addition, the boots do tend to show wear more quickly than we would have anticipated or wanted. After about 50 miles (albeit a rough 50), the softer outer cushion of the boot was already heavily abraded, the suede detail on the sides was piling and looking worn, and the edges of the outer lugs were wearing down and rounding out. Danner does offer “Recrafting,” where their team fixes and even resoles well-worn Danner boots (we checked the style number on the 600 Leaf and they are eligible for this service), but we’d still like them to last longer.
Bringing it full circle back to our original comments, the Danner Mountain 600 Leaf is a very legitimate hiking boot in terms of performance, while also being better-looking than most. Because they actually perform on the trail and off, we appreciate the aesthetic Danner has put together here. Who ever thought hiking gear could look so cool? For more, see our review of the Danner Mountain Leaf 600.
For those who prioritize comfort, the Anacapa is a plush, breathable hiking boot from Hoka with a lot to like. Throw in a lower price tag than the Kaha line and a lighter weight, and we’re officially intrigued.
For those who prioritize comfort, the Anacapa is a plush, breathable hiking boot from Hoka with a lot to like. Throw in a lower price tag than the Kaha line and a lighter weight, and we’re officially intrigued.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Terrain
Easy/moderate
Weight
2 lb. 4 oz.
Waterproof
Yes (non-WP available)
Upper
Leather/synthetic
Pros
Cons
For Hoka enthusiasts or those curious, the Anacapa 2 Mid GTX is their popular lightweight hiking model. Let’s start with the nuts and bolts: The Anacapa comes in at a reasonable weight of 2 pounds 4 ounces while offering Hoka’s signature plush feel. The upper is made with a combination of leather and mesh, resulting in solid protection and breathability for warm days on the trail. The outsole features premium Vibram Megagrip rubber, which we found to be grippy on everything from in-town trails to steep rocks. Throw in Gore-Tex bootie waterproofing, and the Anacapa makes for a comfy and capable ride over a range of trail conditions.
Backing up the truck a bit, why does Hoka’s Kaha 3 GTX cost $45 more? The Kaha features a full-leather upper, which protects the feet better against rocks and roots. In terms of comfort, both have EVA midsoles but the pricier Kaha is a bit more plush, and particularly with regard to the liner and padding. And finally, the third iteration of the Kaha tightens everything up a bit—the midsole and outsole have the air of a true-blue hiking boot. All that said, the Anacapa feels much more nimble and offers an ideal combination of stability and cushion for the majority of hikers who stick to easy and moderate trails.
With any Hoka hiking boot or shoe, you have to consider durability. The Anacapa 2 Mid tends to do just fine on established trails where it isn’t taking a beating, but the lightweight materials and outsole (which features a healthy supply of blown rubber) can show plenty of wear when the going gets rough. On top of that, we aren’t big fans of the swallowtail heel protruding off the back. It’s a fine feature for easy trails without obstructions, but isn’t ideal for tighter pockets and more technical terrain. For more, see our review of the Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid.
A spin-off of La Sportiva’s popular TX approach shoes, this minimalist leather boot is surprisingly capable in most terrain and conditions. You can find more protective or rugged models, but we appreciate the balance of comfort and performance of the TX Hike Mid.
A spin-off of La Sportiva’s popular TX approach shoes, this minimalist leather boot is surprisingly capable in most terrain and conditions. You can find more protective or rugged models, but we appreciate the balance of comfort and performance of the TX Hike Mid.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Terrain
Moderate
Weight
1 lb. 15 oz.
Waterproof
Yes
Upper
Leather
Pros
Cons
La Sportiva is a leader in modern trail footwear, with just about every model we’ve tested being thoughtfully designed and well-built. At less than two pounds, the TX Hike Mid Leather GTX is a wonderful all-around hiking boot for those who believe that less is more. While offering the benefits of leather (durability, protection, foot-hugging fit, to name a few), it’s also lightweight and agile, impressively grippy on rock, and comfortable out-of-the-box. Added up, it’s all the reasons a hiker might reach for a trail runner, but in a mid-height leather design that’s at home in the mountains. Our tester took the TX Hike Mid Leather GTX on a 40-mile loop in the Dark Canyon Wilderness in Utah with a 45-pound pack and came away with nothing but praise.
In terms of limitations, the TX Hike Mid Leather is not the most protective boot out there. The ankle has substantial padding, with thin leather and nothing in the way of rubber rands, it doesn’t come remotely close to the tank-like nature of boots like the Salomon Quest 4 or Lowa Camino. And while our tester found that cinching up the collar gave a nice boost in ankle support, this is not a particularly stiff or supportive boot. Finally, while this is a small gripe, the TX Hike is offered in limited colorways in the United States—La Sportiva tends to flex its full range in Europe, but we wouldn’t mind seeing more options to choose from here.
Like La Sportiva’s TX approach shoes, the TX Hike Mid has a relatively wide fit, and particularly in the toe box (our tester compared them to the Altra Lone Peak, which is known for being very roomy). As a result, they are not ideal for those with low-volume feet. The La Sportiva Nucleo has a more standard fit, but it lacks the TX Hike’s truly nimble personality. All told, the TX Hike Mid is one of our top recommendations for hikers looking for an agile yet capable mid-height design; if you’re in the market for a burly, protective boot, look elsewhere. For more, read our review of the La Sportiva TX Hike.
One of the best all-arounders we tested, the Salomon X Ultra 5 Mid GTX delivers impressive support, protection, and durability for its low weight. However, it's not stiff or protective as a true mountain boot, and the thick tongue can make ankle tension harder to dial in.
One of the best all-arounders we tested, the Salomon X Ultra 5 Mid GTX delivers impressive support, protection, and durability for its low weight. However, it's not stiff or protective as a true mountain boot, and the thick tongue can make ankle tension harder to dial in.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Terrain
Moderate
Weight
1 lb. 15 oz.
Waterproof
Yes
Upper
Synthetic
Pros
Cons
Salomon helped usher in the modern era of hiking boots when the X Ultra line debuted in 2012, back when the market was dominated by tall, heavy leather models. More than a decade later, the Salomon X Ultra 5 Mid GTX is still one of the best examples of how far boot design has come. This mid-height hiker strikes a smart balance between trail-runner agility and backpacking-boot support, offering a stable yet lightweight build that doesn’t sacrifice protection. The outsole delivers reliable traction on everything from packed dirt to loose rock (though there are better choices for technical scrambling), and reinforcements like the rubber toe cap and hard plastic sidewall armor punch well above the boot’s weight. Waterproofing is handled by a Gore-Tex membrane—still the gold standard for breathable, weather-ready footwear.
While we weren’t overly impressed with the fourth iteration, the updated “5” is a significant leap forward. Salomon swapped the upper for a burly Kevlar-like Matryx weave, addressing one of our biggest complaints with the previous version: premature wear and tear. What hasn’t changed is the out-of-the-box comfort and confidence-inspiring ride. The X Ultra 5 feels nimble and athletic underfoot, with enough structure to haul a moderate pack across varied terrain. It’s also one of the more accommodating boots for wide-footed hikers, especially in the dedicated wide-fit version, which eases pressure across the forefoot without compromising performance.
Of course, no boot is without trade-offs. The heavily padded tongue can make it tough to cinch down the midfoot, and the round laces feel a bit overbuilt. And while the X Ultra 5 shines on well-maintained trails and dry, rocky routes, it’s not built for sustained snow travel or hauling expedition loads—those jobs still call for something stiffer and more protective. But for most day hikers and weekend backpackers looking for one boot to do it all, the X Ultra 5 Mid GTX is among the most versatile and trail-ready options out there. For more, read our review of the X Ultra 5 Mid.
Built for technical terrain both on and off the trail, the Offtrail Hike LT Mid GTX offers impressive comfort, durability, and protection. It’s more supportive than most synthetic hiking boots, but its heavier weight and wide platform can make it feel bulky and less precise on rock.
Built for technical terrain both on and off the trail, the Offtrail Hike LT Mid GTX offers impressive comfort, durability, and protection. It’s more supportive than most synthetic hiking boots, but its heavier weight and wide platform can make it feel bulky and less precise on rock.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Terrain
Moderate/rugged
Weight
2 lb. 3.3 oz.
Waterproof
Yes
Upper
Synthetic
Pros
Cons
We often associate synthetic hiking boots with lightweight, agility-focused designs, but the Offtrail flips that script entirely. True to its name, this boot is a tank—it’s built to power through talus, grip to mud and snow, and charge across boulder fields with confidence. The thick Cordura upper is exceptionally hardwearing, reinforced with nubuck leather, TPU overlays, and a burly rubber toe cap that acts like a bumper on all sides. In many ways, the Offtrail mirrors the DNA of a traditional leather hiking boot but with a modern synthetic spin.
Despite its rugged build, The North Face Offtrail feels surprisingly comfortable right out of the box. A generously padded collar and tongue hug the foot and ankle, while the wide toe box allows for natural toe splay, making it a great option for those with high-volume feet. Underfoot, the cushioning strikes a nice balance between plush and firm—it’s softer than a traditional backpacking boot but not as cloud-like as a Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid—offering comfort for long days while maintaining the stability needed for off-trail travel.
Of course, all of this durability comes at a cost. The Offtrail is heavy—even heavier than many leather hiking boots—and we felt the weight immediately, especially when picking through boulder fields where it felt boat-like and cumbersome. If you’re looking for a nimble, trail-runner inspired boot, this isn’t it. And while the Offtrail’s aggressive lugs shine on loose terrain like snow, mud, and wet leaves, it wouldn’t be our first choice for particularly rocky terrain. In those conditions, you’d be better off with a boot like the Ultra Raptor II Mid Leather, which features a smooth outsole that’s built to stick to boulders and slabs. But for hikers—especially those with wide feet—who want a burly, protective boot, the Offtrail is an impressive and unique synthetic option. For more, read our in-depth review of The North Face Offtrail Hike LT Mid GTX.
Don’t be fooled by the Free Hiker 2.0’s trail-runner looks—this is a stiff, durable hiking boot built for serious mountain travel. It’s overkill for mellow trails, and the firm underfoot feel won’t be for everyone.
Don’t be fooled by the Free Hiker 2.0’s trail-runner looks—this is a stiff, durable hiking boot built for serious mountain travel. It’s overkill for mellow trails, and the firm underfoot feel won’t be for everyone.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Terrain
Moderate
Weight
2 lb. 4.2 oz.
Waterproof
Yes (non-WP available)
Upper
Synthetic
Pros
Cons
The Adidas Free Hiker 2.0 GTX is a unique hiking boot that offers more than meets the eye. On the surface, we love the fun, modern design that isn’t at all reminiscent of the hiking boots of yore. But looks aside, this is a surprisingly capable boot that offers excellent support with an over-the-ankle cut and solid traction on a variety of terrain, specifically rock. What’s more, we’ve found the mesh upper to be impressively abrasion-resistant despite its streamlined look, and the Gore-Tex membrane underneath effectively keeps moisture at bay. In terms of weight, 2 pounds 4.2 ounces for the pair doesn’t make the Terrex the lightest option out there, but it’s reasonable given everything mentioned above.
Despite its modern aesthetic, the Free Hiker 2.0 GTX is not a heavily cushioned boot. In fact, it reminds us most of an approach shoe—stiff, firm, and extremely capable and stable on rocky terrain. You do sacrifice some comfort with this design, but only if you’re looking for a really plush ride. Our tester Sarina took the Free Hiker 2.0 out of the box on a 22-mile backpacking loop in Olympic National Park and had nothing but praise for their performance on easy, established trails. A few weeks later, after a cross-country trip through the North Cascades with a heavier pack, she was bemoaning their lack of cushion. Your mileage may vary depending on what terrain you feel comfortable on and how much separation you prefer to have from the ground. In the end, the Free Hiker 2.0 is a fantastic lightweight option for those who value a precise, athletic boot over a plush design. For a deeper dive, read our review of the Adidas Terrex Free Hiker 2.0 GTX.
For backpacking in moderate terrain and potentially wet conditions, the Falcon is a solid all-around hiking boot with a quality build. We appreciate the comfort and padding but wish the traction were a bit more substantial to match the rest of the boot’s capabilities.
For backpacking in moderate terrain and potentially wet conditions, the Falcon is a solid all-around hiking boot with a quality build. We appreciate the comfort and padding but wish the traction were a bit more substantial to match the rest of the boot’s capabilities.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Terrain
Moderate
Weight
2 lb. 2.6 oz.
Waterproof
Yes
Upper
Synthetic/leather
Pros
Cons
The Asolo Falcon Evo GV is an understated hiking boot. At just over two pounds for the pair, it isn’t a modern lightweight hiker, nor does it offer the burliness of popular heavyweight models from brands like Salomon or Lowa. That said, we appreciate what Asolo has done here: the Falcon Evo GV is comfortable for everything from day hiking to multi-day trips, has excellent padding and protection around the ankle, and great waterproofing. Moreover, the suede and nylon blend isn’t stiff and requires little break-in. Our tester was skeptical of the Falcon (she typically prefers to hike in trail runners), but ended up appreciating the boot’s nimble yet capable personality on snowy and rocky terrain.
In terms of compromises, the Falcon GV has a few. First, the lugs on the outsole aren’t as deep or grippy as other boots in this category, making it less capable on loose or rocky terrain. Second, we experienced some issues with the top of the boot becoming lax over time, so proper lacing and attention are required. Last but not least, $275 is a healthy price tag for a midweight hiking boot that is best on moderate terrain. The similarly priced Lowa Renegade Evo admittedly is heavier but gives you more bang for the buck, and the La Sportiva TX Hike Leather is similar on the performance front (and better on rock) for over $70 less.
One final note is that we have had good experiences with Asolo quality, which helps make that price point a little easier to swallow. We’ve put the Falcon GV Evo through the ringer and they came out looking mostly new. We suspect that if Asolo were to improve the traction on this boot, it would be more competitive and well-known. For more, read our review of the Asolo Falcon Evo GV.
The Nucleo High II is La Sportiva’s modern take on the traditional leather hiking boot, with an emphasis on breathability and comfort. Their nimble, sticky, and protective personality makes them a great companion for above-treeline terrain, but the supple leather does compromise structure and support.
The Nucleo High II is La Sportiva’s modern take on the traditional leather hiking boot, with an emphasis on breathability and comfort. Their nimble, sticky, and protective personality makes them a great companion for above-treeline terrain, but the supple leather does compromise structure and support.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Terrain
Moderate
Weight
2 lb. 1.6 oz.
Waterproof
Yes
Upper
Leather
Pros
Cons
Visit any mountainous area in the West, and you can bet your boots you’ll see the Nucleo High II GTX on the trail. One of La Sportiva’s most popular models year after year, the Nucleo High II is a great option for hikers who want the durability and protection of leather in a modern and relatively lightweight package. And with Gore-Tex Surround (designed for feet that sweat) and a ventilated panel near the midfoot, it breathes better than most leather designs, too.
Our tester took the Nucleo High II GTX on a four-day traverse through Washington State’s Alpine Lakes Wilderness and noted that the boots were most at home above treeline. The Vibram outsole offered solid traction on smooth granite boulders and slabs, the large rubber rands protected her feet when boulder hopping and traversing talus, and the boot felt more nimble and flexible than its leather design might suggest. What’s more, they were immediately comfortable out of the box (even when moving quickly down easy trails) and required no break-in period thanks to the supple leather and well-padded collar and tongue.
However, despite being Sportiva’s modern take on the traditional leather hiking boot, our tester did note that the Nucleo High II was old-school for her taste, stating that they felt “frumpy like an Oboz” (she prefers to hike in trail runners, so take this with a grain of salt). The upper was surprisingly soft (which could be a boon for some, but also compromises support) and became heavy with moisture after just an hour of hiking on snow—we recommend applying a leather conditioner before using in wet conditions. These gripes aside, if you’re in the market for a leather boot, the Nucleo High II is a popular lightweight option, and its athletic design excels in mountainous environments. For more, read our review of the La Sportiva Nucleo High II GTX.
For the roughest of terrain, the Quest is a burly and tough hiker with excellent waterproofing to boot. That said, it’s heavy and overkill for most conditions.
For the roughest of terrain, the Quest is a burly and tough hiker with excellent waterproofing to boot. That said, it’s heavy and overkill for most conditions.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Terrain
Rugged
Weight
2 lb. 14 oz.
Waterproof
Yes
Upper
Leather/synthetic
Pros
Cons
The Salomon Quest 4 GTX is a tank. Let’s be clear: this nearly 3-pound pair of hiking boots with a high ankle is built for tough terrain and carrying heavy packs. In addition to excellent waterproofing, its bellwether features are support, traction, and protection. Our tester used them extensively on the rugged Lofoten Islands of Norway, and they did the job while hiking rocky and dense coastline, scrambling over big boulders that were slick with ocean spray, and trudging through dense mud (the kind that makes that sucking sound when you try and lift your foot out). They even maintained their grip while walking down steep sections of crumbly and sharp rock that was wet from the rain.
Despite the upsides, the Quest 4 GTX are noticeably bulky and stiff hiking boots. We experienced a lengthy break-in period, and the fabric on the top of the boot was so inflexible at the outset that it led to extensive foot soreness. Even after the break-in, comfort improved but the boot remained stiff and less nimble than competing models, even in the heavyweight category.
In the end, the Quest 4 GTX is a purpose-built heavyweight for those who don’t mind the extra heft. Salomon’s waterproofing is excellent, the boots are protective around the foot and offer solid ankle support due to their high cut, and are grippy over a variety of terrain. You may be able to achieve similar performance with a lighter, more comfortable, yet still-capable boot like the Lowa Renegade, but the Salomon Quest 4 GTX remains a leader in the toughness category. For more, read our review of the Salomon Quest 4 GTX.
This unique hiking boot is a comfortable and stylish option for non-technical trails, with more stability than you’d expect. However, they aren’t particularly protective, and traction falls short of the competition.
This unique hiking boot is a comfortable and stylish option for non-technical trails, with more stability than you’d expect. However, they aren’t particularly protective, and traction falls short of the competition.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Terrain
Easy/moderate
Weight
1 lb. 15.1 oz.
Waterproof
Yes
Upper
Synthetic
Pros
Cons
At first glance, the On Cloudrock is one spiffy pair of hiking boots. The sleek and modern design features a 100% recycled synthetic upper, an over-the-ankle cut for solid stability, and generous underfoot cushion with On’s trademark air pockets. On’s footwear is beloved for its strong city-to-trail aesthetic, and the Cloudrock is no exception. And with this latest update—confusingly, the new model is called “Cloudrock” whereas the predecessor was the “Cloudrock 2”—On upped its performance game with a full rethink of its outsole.
How does the new On Cloudrock perform on the trails? The upgraded rubber is tackier, and the small rectangular lugs improve bite on rock and in dry conditions. But it’s still far from a class-leader—the lugs are shallow and don’t dig in reliably in slippery or technical terrain—and the boot generally leans towards the more casual end of the spectrum. Underfoot, the cushioning lands in between a plush Hoka and a stiffer approach-style boot. This translated to all-day comfort for us in testing, even under the weight of an overnight pack. Adding to the comfort is soft padding around the collar and tongue, along with a lacing system that securely locks your feet in place.
While the Cloudrock feels like a solid step in the right direction, it also truly doesn’t stand out in any particular way (beyond its clean styling). It’s decently light but doesn’t feel like a full-on nimble trail runner, and the moderate support, grip, and protection make it best for on-trail applications. For day hikers who prefer a little extra ankle coverage, the On Cloudrock is a perfectly viable option, but we think there are more capable and comfortable options on the market that cost less. For more, read our in-depth review of the Cloudrock Mid.
A beefy, traditional hiking boot, the Targhee has been around for twenty years and is still here to tell the story. However, it’s becoming long in the tooth compared to more modern designs, with a clunky build and particularly middling traction. It excels in durability and protection.
A beefy, traditional hiking boot, the Targhee has been around for twenty years and is still here to tell the story. However, it’s becoming long in the tooth compared to more modern designs, with a clunky build and particularly middling traction. It excels in durability and protection.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Terrain
Easy/moderate
Weight
2 lb. 8.2 oz.
Waterproof
Yes (non-WP available)
Upper
Leather
Pros
Cons
While most of the hiking footwear industry moves in the direction of lighter and faster, the Targhee IV Mid is here to remind us of where we came from. Unabashedly traditional, the Targhee has a burly leather upper, stiff midsole with a nylon shank, and massive rubber toe cap, creating a safe and stable haven for the feet. Like many standard hiking boots, the underfoot cushioning is medium-firm, and you get thick cushioning at the collar and tongue for comfort. The Targhee also gets high marks for sustainability thanks to a very durable construction (including a compression-resistant midsole and delamination-free guarantee), PFAS-free waterproofing, humanely sourced leather, and recycled materials.
The Targhee IV is an ode to hiking boots of yore, and that’s exactly what some trail-goers want. However, its performance falls short of more modern designs, especially for those tackling tricky terrain, hiking long distances, or logging speedy miles. Not only is the Targhee IV sluggish, but traction is a notable downfall—we’ve slipped around on rock wearing these boots more than we’d care to admit. Further, the stiff build takes some time to break in and might cause hot spots or blisters out of the box. On the flipside, the Targhee is a stellar value: for the reasonable price of $170, it’s a boot that will last you season after season. If you stick to well-established trails and love the feeling of a durable, protective, and supportive hiking boot, it’s worth a look. For more, read our review of the Targhee IV Mid.
With a roomy toe box, zero drop, and soft suede upper, the Lone Peak Hiker 3 is the slipper of hiking boots. It’s undeniably comfortable, but most hikers will find that it doesn’t offer enough protection or support for anything more than smooth trails.
With a roomy toe box, zero drop, and soft suede upper, the Lone Peak Hiker 3 is the slipper of hiking boots. It’s undeniably comfortable, but most hikers will find that it doesn’t offer enough protection or support for anything more than smooth trails.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Terrain
Easy
Weight
1 lb. 11.4 oz.
Waterproof
No
Upper
Leather
Pros
Cons
If your top consideration is comfort, pause here for a second with the Altra Lone Peak Hiker. The first two things to know about the Lone Peak Hiker are that it features a zero drop (most hiking boots raise the heel anywhere from 5 to 12 millimeters) and a very roomy toe box, both of which are rare among hiking boots. Tack on a super-soft suede upper and a low weight, and the result is a pair of boots we’ve come to call our “trail slippers.” The toes can relax and spread out, the low stack height offers a close-to-the-ground feel, and there’s zero break-in period. Lone Peaks are well-loved amongst the thru-hiking community for their comfort-first personality, and the mid-height Hiker brings the same vibe to the hiking boot space.
However, there are several noteworthy downsides to the Hiker’s slipper mentality. The relatively thin midsole and thin suede upper offer little in the way of protection, and the flat and wide footbed doesn’t remotely lock the foot in like other boots. On anything more than smooth, established trails, the Hiker will feel out of its element; and if you have narrow feet, they’ll swim inside. Altra did make a number of improvements in the updated “3" we tested, including adding hooks at the collar for easier on and off, more durable and protective rubber toe bumpers (much-needed upgrades, in our opinion), and a gripper outsole (we can confirm). All told, if you place comfort at the helm and stick to easy paths with lightweight loads, the Lone Peak Hiker is worth a look. For more, read our review of the Altra Lone Peak Hiker 3.
With a jaw-dropping price point and weight, the Camino certainly isn’t for everyone. But if you are looking for the ultimate in support and craftsmanship, it’s a high-quality option.
With a jaw-dropping price point and weight, the Camino certainly isn’t for everyone. But if you are looking for the ultimate in support and craftsmanship, it’s a high-quality option.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Terrain
Rugged
Weight
3 lb. 8.4 oz.
Waterproof
Yes
Upper
Leather
Pros
Cons
Sitting just below the lightweight mountaineering boot category is a class of heavyweight hikers including the Lowa Camino Evo GTX. First and foremost, this boot is polarizing in terms of what it offers. It costs a whopping $350, but from the moment we took it out of the box, the quality and craftsmanship were clear. And after extended use in challenging conditions, the boot looked almost new. In terms of performance, the Camino offers superb traction and support, and the waterproofing is some of the best we’ve used. Our tester stood in a river letting the water run close to the top of the boot for about five full minutes, and watched as it beaded up and slid right off, leaving him with dry feet.
You may have heard the old adage, “One pound on your feet equals five pounds on your back,” which refers to an old U.S. Army study about energy expenditure. If this holds true—or even close to it—you will pay a price for hiking or backpacking extended distances with a boot like the Lowa Camino Evo GTX. Other models on the list may not offer the same amounts of durability or support, but, realistically, having almost 2 pounds on each foot is a big downside. On top of that, the Camino is stiff out of the box, requires a serious break-in period, and doesn’t loosen up all that much.
Hiking footwear often comes down to preference. If you are particularly prone to rolling your ankles and therefore prefer a high level of support, or are hiking through really tough conditions that require top-tier support, traction, and waterproofing, we can’t argue with the quality this boot provides. That said, we generally prefer more nimble options (even the burly Salomon Quest is 10 ounces lighter per pair) that will make your experience in the backcountry more pleasant. For more, read our review of the Lowa Camino Evo GTX.
Merrell goes modern with the Moab Speed 2, combining lightweight design, plush cushioning, and unexpectedly strong support. You sacrifice some protection and durability, but it’s hard to beat this boot’s comfortable and athletic feel.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
For those who prioritize comfort, the Anacapa is a plush, breathable hiking boot from Hoka with a lot to like. Throw in a lower price tag than the Kaha line and a lighter weight, and we’re officially intrigued.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
One of the best all-arounders we tested, the Salomon X Ultra 5 Mid GTX delivers impressive support, protection, and durability for its low weight. However, it's not stiff or protective as a true mountain boot, and the thick tongue can make ankle tension harder to dial in.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Our overall rating takes the product’s full picture into account: price, build quality, performance (based on intended use), durability, sustainability, and more. On the high end of the rating scale are standout hiking boots that have something special to offer, whether they’re the crème de la crème or budget designs that offer a savvy combination of price and performance. If you ask us, most readers should be looking to purchase a hiking boot with a good overall rating—there’s simply little reason not to. That said, hiking boots with lower overall ratings are still notable enough to have made our list. For various reasons, these might be compelling to users with specific design preferences or who get out only a few times a year.
Comfort is a tricky subject when it comes to hiking boots. On one hand, their focus on stability and protection can detract from what we’d typically think of as a comfortable piece of footwear, with stiff, unyielding materials that surround the foot and extend above the ankle. On the other hand, some hikers might feel comforted by this level of isolation from the elements—as long as it's sustainable, mile after mile. No matter what, everyone needs their boots to meet a baseline level of comfort in order to enjoy hiking and continue forward progress down the trail.
In other words, comfort can be a subjective element that’s linked to personal preferences, in addition to fit. But in an effort to bring the rating some objectivity, we’re using the guiding question, “Do you want to keep the boot on when you arrive at your destination, or are you eager to get it off?” Boots that score high on our scale are objectively comfortable, with plush cushion, a flexible midsole and outsole, and a light feel. Boots that score lower are stiff, firm, and heavy. These numbers are simply meant to be a guide, not a measure of better or worse. Some hikers might intentionally opt for a boot that scores mid-range for comfort in order to reap their other benefits, and that’s okay.
Extremely comfortable, with a plush upper, soft midsole cushioning, flexible outsole, and low weight.
Average comfort. Often stiff and lacking in cushion. Clunky and heavy. May require a long break-in time.
Not comfortable and likely not a great choice for hiking.
One of the primary reasons to opt for a hiking boot over a hiking shoe is the additional structure. While you don’t necessarily need much support and stability for short day hikes over easy terrain with a light overnight pack, it can be imperative for mountainous terrain or carrying heavy loads. Rather than conforming to every obstacle on the trail, a stable boot offers a solid platform for the foot by way of an internal shank, external frame, polyurethane plate underfoot, heel counter, and stiff collar. Ultimately, the boot should do the work of navigating the contours of the trail—not your foot. This helps prevent foot fatigue and ankle rolls and instills confidence while forging through challenging terrain.
If you spend much of your time on rugged trails or cross-country terrain (traversing scree slopes, kicking steps in snow, navigating boulder fields, etc.), you’ll likely want a boot that ranks high for stability and support. These are generally our top choice for less experienced or older hikers, too. On the other hand, boots that score lower on our support and stability scale are lighter, more flexible, and more responsive. If you hike on smooth surfaces, are quick and nimble on technical terrain, or aim for big-mileage days, you might gravitate toward a less supportive boot (or opt instead for a hiking shoe). Like many things, this comes down to personal preference.
Excellent stability and support, thanks to stiff materials, firm cushioning, and a high collar.
Average stability and support. Materials are more supple and lightweight; the collar doesn’t extend quite as high. That said, expect the boot to still have a firmer underfoot platform than, say, a trail running shoe.
Sub-par stability and support. Look for soft or thin midsoles and flexible outsoles and uppers.
Having a boot that offers solid traction on a wide variety of terrain can often be overlooked, but it’s one of the most important factors to feeling confident on your feet. The biggest determinant of traction is the type of outsole rubber used—varieties from Vibram and Continental perform best, while in-house efforts can be more compromised. Lug pattern and depth also play into what type of terrain the boot excels on: Hiking boots with tall, stiff, and well-spaced lugs, for example, offer a solid hold on wet and loose terrain like mud, leaves, and snow. On the other hand, hiking boots with smoother lugs are better for rock. If you frequent easier trails or hike exclusively on one type of terrain, you can get away with a boot that scores lower on our traction score. But from our personal experience, aiming for an above-average traction rating will lead to the most enjoyable hiking experience.
Excellent traction on all types of terrain, from rocks and roots to mud, snow, and wet leaves. Vibram and Continental varieties are top performers.
Average traction. You might find yourself lacking confidence on rock or wet terrain.
Below-average traction. Should only be used on easy trails or roads where traction is not an issue.
A hiking boot’s ability to hold up to heavy wear is a function of its upper materials, outsole rubber, and overall build quality. Generally speaking, leather hiking boots are more durable than those with synthetic uppers, although modern materials (like the mesh used in the Adidas Terrex Free Hiker 2.0) are impressive in their abrasion resistance. Regarding outsoles, rubber ranges from uber-sticky to uber-durable, meaning the grippiest shoes aren’t the longest lasting. We’ve also started to see more boots built with a priority on resoleability (like the Danner Mountain 600 Leaf), which is a fun feature as long as the upper is sure to last.
With all the buzz around sustainability, one of the best decisions you can make is to buy gear that lasts (and thus stays out of the landfill). The good news is, it’s also kinder on your wallet. We’d direct everyone to hiking boots that score a 5/5 in durability, but these boots do have their downsides: they’re often heavier and stiffer, which not everyone wants.
Excellent durability, thanks to a burly leather or thick synthetic upper, top-notch build quality, and long-lasting rubber outsole.
Average durability due to lightweight and flexible materials.
Poor durability; not a great value if you want a boot to last you longer than a few multi-day trips.
The most protective hiking boots feature generous rubber rands, burly toe caps, solid heel protection, thick rubber uppers, and rock plates or thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) inserts under the foot. Boots with thinner uppers and fewer reinforcements are lower on the protection scale. While foot protection is a matter of personal preference, we like to match our footwear with the type of terrain we’re traveling over. For cross-country travel and particularly difficult trails, we prefer a boot that’s above average in terms of protection. For easier trails, you can get away with less.
Excellent foot protection thanks to generous rubber rands, a burly toe cap, solid heel protection, a durable leather upper, and a rock plate or TPU insert.
Average foot protection. Great for easy and moderate trails but not our top choice for difficult terrain.
Sub-par foot protection. Only recommended for easy hiking trails with few rocks or roots.
Our sustainability rating for hiking boots takes into account nine different criteria. On the product level, we’re looking for recycled or Bluesign-approved materials, responsible leather (if applicable), and PFAS/PFC-free waterproof membranes and durable water-repellent finishes (if applicable). On the brand level, our criteria include whether the company has a dedicated resale or recycling program, uses recycled or reduced packaging, monitors greenhouse gas emissions, and publishes an annual impact report. We also consider the degree to which our criteria are met. For example, 10% recycled materials is not the same as 100% recycled materials. Note that not every sustainability effort by a brand or product fits neatly into our categories. In these circumstances, we may choose to increase or decrease a rating based on these factors. You can find details on these factors in the sustainability drop-down under each product above.
These boots are among the most sustainable on the market and earn our Better Trail Certified distinction. They often meet most of our sustainability criteria for this category.
These boots are a good, middle-of-the-pack option for sustainability. They often meet about half or more of our criteria for this category.
These boots are the least sustainable and have significant room for improvement. They usually only meet about a quarter or less of our criteria.
In our descriptions above, we list the type of terrain that each boot is best for, from easy to moderate to rugged. When we think of easy trails, we think of well-established tracks with smooth, hard-packed dirt and minimal obstacles. The hiking boots we designate for easy trails are one step up from a trail running shoe, with minimal stability and protection compared to other mid-height designs. Moderate trails are the type of trail that most of us hike on when we head to the backcountry: Rocky or rooted paths that require careful stepping, where you might benefit from a boot with some torsional stiffness and beefy heel and toe caps. Finally, our “rugged” designation denotes above-treeline trails or cross-country travel, including everything from talus and boulder fields to fourth-class rock, snow, scree, and more. In rugged territory, most hikers will appreciate a tank-like boot that can forge through loose terrain and live to tell the story.
Chosen for its durability, protection, and form-hugging fit, leather is the most traditional material used in hiking boot uppers, and for good reason. It comes in a number of forms, ranging from the thin, roughout leather on the La Sportiva TX Hike Mid Leather GTX, to thick applications like the Lowa Camino’s Nubuck. No matter the variety, leather boots will almost always have a longer life than synthetic boots: We’ve had some hold up so well that they need a resole before the upper shows any signs of giving up. Leather is also highly water resistant and can be decently waterproof when treated with a leather wax or spray.
The downside of leather is that it is generally heavier and less breathable than synthetic materials, meaning that leather boots can feel overkill on hot summer hikes. However, as we mentioned, not all leather is created equal—we’ve been happy wearing the TX Hike on above-treeline trips in the summer. More downsides of leather include its lengthy break-in time (again, not as big of a deal with thinner varieties) and its tendency to grow laden with moisture if you don’t keep it properly conditioned.
Hiking boots with synthetic uppers can be a good choice if you’re hiking in hot weather or want a lightweight, nimble design. Most synthetic materials aren’t as durable or protective as leather, although some modern-day offerings come pretty close (the Adidas Terrex Free Hiker 2.0’s tightly woven mesh is one example). Synthetic materials are also known for their breathability and low weight, and they generally wick rather than absorb moisture (as leather is prone to do). We’re more bullish on synthetic hiking shoes over boots, given that the main reason many reach for hiking shoes is their lightweight design. But for those who want the added ankle support of a boot without adding too much weight, a synthetic hiking boot can be a good idea.
Most hiking boots come with waterproof membranes, which are sandwiched between the upper and liner and are exceptionally good at keeping water out (even if the upper becomes saturated). Gore-Tex is the biggest name in waterproofing and offers the most reliable protection—proven in boots like The North Face's Offtrail Hike LT Mid GTX—but in-house efforts like Keen.Dry and Oboz’s B-Dry work in all but the most sustained moisture. The deficits of budget waterproof membranes are most experienced in their lack of breathability.
Some boots are also available in non-waterproof designs, which means you’ll often have the choice between the two. While everyone wants dry feet, it’s worth giving some thought to your decision. Waterproof boots don’t breathe as well as their non-waterproof brethren and can easily grow swampy and clammy, which isn’t ideal when hiking in hot summer conditions. If you regularly get out in the dry desert or wouldn't mind the radiant cooling offered by the occasional wet foot, a non-waterproof boot can be a suitable choice. The good news is that non-waterproof boots are generally $10 to $30 less than waterproof designs, and a few ounces lighter.
There’s not much you can do to maintain your boot’s waterproof membrane—it’s hidden between two layers of fabric and should continue to perform well as long as it stays protected. You can, however, treat the upper—the boot’s first line of defense against moisture—with products that wick away water, such as Nikwax’s Fabric & Leather Proof Spray. It’s especially important to keep up with regular applications on leather boots, which can grow saturated and heavy with moisture when not treated.
Getting a good lock with your boot’s laces is important—a loose boot can move around your foot and cause rubbing, especially at the heel. Most of the boots on our list above feature a standard lacing system that uses eyelets along the top of the foot and transitions to hooks for the two or three lace points at the ankle and above. Some also use a locking hook at the transition point between the foot and the ankle, which allows you to achieve different levels of tightness in both areas of the boot. Regarding laces, we certainly favor flat over rounded designs, as the latter are prone to come undone, even when double-knotted.
The midsole sits right on top of the outsole and is responsible for most of a boot’s cushioning, stability, and underfoot protection. Here, we see materials like lightweight EVA foam, stiff polyurethane foam, and even rock plates or shanks made of nylon or a flexible plastic known as thermoplastic polyurethane. The material greatly impacts the feel of the midsole, from plush and bouncy designs like the Altra Olympus 6 Hike Mid GTX to torsionally stiff boots like the Lowa Camino. The former offers great comfort for easy trail miles but will feel squirrely on challenging terrain, while the latter is stable and protective, great for rocky and rooty travel, and hikers who value security and support over agility and weight-savings.
The outsole of a hiking boot is what touches the ground as you hike. Most outsoles are 100% rubber, designed to provide confidence-inspiring hold on a variety of terrain, including dirt, rock, and snow. Several factors determine how well an outsole performs, including the type of rubber and the pattern and depth of the lugs.
Outsole rubber ranges from sticky and soft (climbing shoes feature the stickiest rubber blends) to durable and firm. Most hiking boots err on the durable side of the spectrum, which is sufficient for dirt trails with the occasional root or rock. Some approach-minded hiking boots (like the La Sportiva TX Hike Mid Leather GTX) strike a balance between durability and traction on rock—these are a great choice for routes that travel above treeline. Finally, some rubber compounds are specifically made to provide grip on slippery terrain like ice, wet leaves, and snow. In general, you can expect names like Vibram and Continental to deliver confidence-inspiring traction on challenging terrain, while in-house efforts like Oboz’s Granite Peak or Keen’s Keen.Rugged get the job done on trails but aren’t well-suited for cross-country routes.
Additionally, an outsole’s tread pattern and lug depth greatly impact traction. Most hiking boots seek to offer a secure hold on everything—from firm rock to loose mud—but there are some specialists. For example, the La Sportiva Ultra Raptor II Mid Leather GTX (read our Ultra Raptor II Mid review) is a mid-height approach shoe with rounded and shallow lugs that are well-suited for rock. The Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid has large sections of blown rubber on the outsole; these compromise traction on rock, but keep the sole feeling lightweight and plush during easy trail miles. And at the other end of the spectrum are boots like The North Face's Offtrail Hike LT Mid GTX, which features sharp, aggressive that bite well into soft terrain like mud, snow, and wet leaves.
Most hikers will want to size their hiking boots similarly to how they size the rest of their shoes. You want a good lock at the ankle (so that your heel isn’t rubbing with each step) and a small amount of room in front of your toes. If you’re taking on big days and foot swelling is an issue—or if you like to wear thick socks (which we don’t recommend for summer hiking)—consider sizing up a half-size. We’ve found that hiking boots made by European brands (including La Sportiva and Salomon) can run narrow, although there are some exceptions to this rule, which we call out in the product descriptions above. The good news is that many hiking boots are also available in wide versions, including the La Sportiva Nucleo II High GTX.
The hiking boot versus shoe decision comes down to personal preference. Most of the Better Trail staff hike exclusively in hiking shoes and only step up to a boot for mountaineering objectives that include steep snow or crampon use. On the other hand, we know folks who won’t carry an overnight load without hiking boots on their feet. They are used to their footwear offering above-the-ankle protection, and anything less would feel unsupportive and vulnerable.
So, we encourage you to go with what feels good. However, if you’ve never tried a hiking shoe, we think it’s worth a shot. Unless you have particularly weak ankles, a hiking shoe will be more comfortable, especially for most hikers who stick to established trails. And while you’re at it, consider taking some weight out of your backpacking pack, too. We’re convinced that the lighter you are, the more enjoyable a time you’ll have on the trail.
Gone are the days of 4-pound hiking boots being the norm. Hikers have widely accepted that lighter footwear can lead to more comfort, energy, and enjoyment on the trail. That said, if you’re looking at purchasing a hiking boot over a hiking shoe, you’ve already determined that the additional protection and stability are worth a few extra ounces (or more). Here is a fun fact: The average weight of the 17 models in our hiking shoe gear guide is 1 pound 9.8 ounces, while the average weight of the hiking boots here is 2 pounds 2.8 ounces. Just how many ounces you’re willing to tack on is up to you—it almost goes without saying that a lighter hiking boot will leave you feeling more vulnerable than a heavier design. Some of our favorite boots are midweight varieties that find a nice middle ground between performance and weight-savings, including the Lowa Renegade Evo GTX Mid and La Sportiva Nucleo High II GTX.
There are a number of brands wholly dedicated to building high-quality hiking footwear, including Keen, Oboz, Lowa, and Merrell. Boots from these companies are generally fairly traditional (think predominantly leather designs) and made for the average user with average intentions—most are built for moderate trails at best. In the last few years, each of these legacy brands has also released a modern boot design, including the Merrell Moab Speed 2 Mid and the Keen Zionic. You can rely on boots from these companies being well made and generally quite comfortable, although more specialized users (those moving fast and light or headed into particularly rugged terrain) might still find them archaic and limited.
Brands like Altra, Hoka, and On cut their teeth in the running and trail running worlds, but all have something to offer the hiking boot space. These designs are modern and generally both highly cushioned and lightweight, although there are a few exceptions. If you like the feel of a trail running shoe but want above-the-ankle protection, look to these brands. On’s offerings can err towards being more form than function (i.e. not very performance-oriented, but they look good in the city), while Altra’s and Hoka’s boots are built for serious use (as long as you keep them on moderate trails).
Finally, La Sportiva and Salomon sit at the top of the heap in terms of high-performance hiking boots. If you’d had asked us about the top brands in hiking footwear just five years ago, we would have said “Salomon” with resounding confidence, but recently Italian-based La Sportiva has joined the upper echelon (and, in our opinion, overtaken Salomon with its range and quality of designs). With its roots in climbing and mountaineering, La Sportiva boots are our top choice for rugged terrain—they place a high priority on traction, in addition to deftly mixing agility with performance. That said, all-rounder designs like their TX Hike Leather Mid are built for comfort and are equally at home on city park paths and granite ridgelines.
The hiking boots in our guide range from $150 for the Altra Lone Peak Hiker 3 and Merrell Moab 3 Mid to $350 for the Lowa Camino Evo GTX. In general, boots intended for easy trails are more affordable than those built for moderate and rugged terrain. You can also save by opting for designs with in-house outsoles and waterproofing, which are almost always priced for less than those with premium materials like Vibram and Gore-Tex. And in general, synthetic boots are slightly more affordable than leather designs (for example, the synthetic La Sportiva TX Hike Mid is $189, while the leather version is $199).
Merrell’s boots offer a great baseline for where most hikers should land: $180 for the Moab Speed 2 Mid GTX and $150 for the Moab 3 Mid. These boots get the job done on the majority of trails with loads ranging from a day pack to a 50-pound overnight backpack. If you’re looking to save without compromising too much on performance, these are two of our top recommendations.
You’ll want to consider spending more on a boot if you frequent rugged trails or cross-country terrain, enjoy moving quickly and packing in the miles, or value an all-leather build. Boots in this price range include the Hoka Anacapa 2 Mid GTX ($195), Adidas Terrex Free Hiker 2.0 GTX ($220), and Salomon Quest 4 GTX ($230). All-leather designs will be on the pricier side (including the $239 La Sportiva Nucleo High II GTX and $280 Lowa Renegade Evo GTX), but the good news is that these boots should have a long lifespan, which will save you money in the long run. And you’d better have a very good reason for spending more than about $280 on a hiking boot. These boots verge on the lightweight mountaineering category and are too stiff for logging significant trail miles.
We’re glad you asked! In our gear guide above you can use the “Sort By: Sustainability” toggle to reorder all of the products, but we’ll provide a little summary here. The two most sustainable hiking boots on the market are Hoka’s Anacapa 2 Mid GTX and Kaha 3 GTX, which meet nearly all of sustainability criteria through their use of recycled materials, responsible leather, PFAS-free waterproofing, and more (see our Kaha 3 Sustainability Report for additional details). We do wish Hoka offered a shoe recycling program, but the infrastructure needed to recycle shoes is complex and not yet executed well by any one brand. La Sportiva’s TX Hike Mid Leather GTX, the On Cloudrock Mid Waterproof, and the Keen Targhee IV are three notable runners-up (the Targhee in particular excels in longevity). To explore even further, all of the hiking boots in our gear guide have a sustainability analysis included, and you can visit our Sustainability Hub for the deep dive.
hit the trail
Gear Guide
Best Hiking Shoes of 2025
Gear Guide
Best Backpacking Backpacks of 2025
Gear Guide
Best Rain Jackets of 2025
Gear Guide
Best Hiking Pants of 2025
