Best Hiking Shoes of 2025
ByMultiple Authors
Updated:
Jul 29, 2025Table of contents
Merrell Moab Speed 2 GTX ($170)
Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX ($180)
Merrell Moab 3 Waterproof ($160)
Topo Athletic Traverse ($155)
Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX ($180)
Keen Targhee IV Waterproof ($170)
Altra Lone Peak 9 ($140)
La Sportiva TX4 Evo ($189)
An approachable design, the Moab Speed 2 combines hiking-shoe-like stability and support with the low weight and rockered style of a trail running shoe. It's comfortable out of the box and adept both on and off-trail. However, it lacks the performance fit and agility you’d get with a trail runner.
An approachable design, the Moab Speed 2 combines hiking-shoe-like stability and support with the low weight and rockered style of a trail running shoe. It's comfortable out of the box and adept both on and off-trail. However, it lacks the performance fit and agility you’d get with a trail runner.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 8.7 oz.
Waterproof
No (WP available)
Upper
Synthetic
Outsole
Vibram TC5+
Pros
Cons
For those looking for a middle ground between a nimble trail runner and a stiff and supportive hiking shoe, the Merrell Moab Speed 2 is one of our top recommendations. This shoe is as approachable as it gets: It’s comfortable and requires no break-in period, is decently breathable for a waterproof design, grips rock, mud, dirt, and snow securely, and offers a noticeable amount of stability for its low weight. It’s quickly become our go-to shoe for almost every adventure: We’ve worn the Moab Speed 2 everywhere from the Weminuche Wilderness to Moab, Utah, to Mt. Humphreys (the highest point in Arizona) while hiking and backpacking, moving fast on easy ground and picking our way slowly through complex terrain.
The Moab Speed 2 is a modernized version of Merrell’s popular Moab. Despite the fresh look, Merrell didn’t stray too far from the original in terms of stability—the Speed is exceptionally supportive underfoot, thanks to a stiffening Flexplate and a decently burly heel counter. It does sacrifice some protection and durability with a synthetic upper and small toe cap, but the added rocker and plush cushioning boost walkability and comfort. To be clear, the Speed should not be confused with a trail running shoe—it’s a bit clunky, and the roomy fit lacks true performance chops. But for those looking for a nimble and lightweight hiking shoe, it’s an excellent all-rounder. For more, read our review of the Merrell Moab Speed 2.
The Anacapa offers the plush cushion of a running shoe, alongside the stability, protection, and durability of a hiking shoe. It's a great option for hikers who regularly experience foot fatigue or log high-mileage days. However, the wide platform lacks precision on technical terrain and the large sections of exposed foam can break down over time.
The Anacapa offers the plush cushion of a running shoe, alongside the stability, protection, and durability of a hiking shoe. It's a great option for hikers who regularly experience foot fatigue or log high-mileage days. However, the wide platform lacks precision on technical terrain and the large sections of exposed foam can break down over time.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 8.8 oz.
Waterproof
Yes (non-WP available)
Upper
Leather/synthetic
Outsole
Vibram Megagrip
Pros
Cons
Hoka’s max-cushioned running shoes are an undisputed favorite amongst road and trail runners, known for their plush comfort and leg-saving shock absorption. The brand applies the same philosophy to its lineup of hiking shoes, including the Anacapa 2 Low GTX. The Anacapa features thick underfoot cushioning and a rockered sole but adds hiking chops with a partially leather upper, Vibram Megagrip outsole, and solid toe protection. It’s also surprisingly stable, thanks to a relatively stiff midsole (much more reminiscent of a hiking shoe than a trail runner) and a wide platform that minimizes ankle rolls.
The Anacapa 2 Low is a great choice for hikers prone to foot fatigue; we’ve also found them to be easy to break in, with none of the hot spots or blisters that often accompany a new leather shoe. However, the design shows its weakness on technical, off-camber terrain—the large footprint is imprecise when navigating rocks and roots, and the traction isn’t as secure as what you get from an approach or technical hiking shoe. There’s also a lot of exposed foam on the outsole (a weight-saving tactic), which is more prone to wearing away than a full rubber outsole. But if you stick to established trails, the Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX offers incredible comfort and stability. For more, see our review of the Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX.
Merrell’s classic hiking shoe features plush padding for comfort, a durable and protective leather upper, and a stiff build that can easily forge its way through most terrain. It’ll last significantly longer than most lightweight synthetic hiking shoes. However, it’s too heavy and clunky for many modern hikers.
Merrell’s classic hiking shoe features plush padding for comfort, a durable and protective leather upper, and a stiff build that can easily forge its way through most terrain. It’ll last significantly longer than most lightweight synthetic hiking shoes. However, it’s too heavy and clunky for many modern hikers.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
2 lb. 2 oz.
Waterproof
Yes (non-WP available)
Upper
Leather
Outsole
Vibram TC5
Pros
Cons
The Merrell Moab is one of the most iconic hiking shoes ever to grace the trail. It’s neither modern nor lightweight, but there’s a reason this shoe is a best-seller: It’s comfortable out-of-the-box with plush padding at the collar and tongue, has a solid, planted feel, offers tank-like protection against roots and rocks, and uses durable materials that will last longer than most synthetic alternatives. And in a world where many hiking shoes are approaching $200, the $160 price point is refreshing ($140 for the non-waterproof Moab).
Our tester was skeptical of the Moab before trying it, lumping it into the clunky “dad shoe” category (she tends to wear lightweight hiking shoes). But it didn't take long before she, too, had drunk the Kool-Aid, attesting, “The Moab is the kind of shoe you can put on and never think about again.” Compared to a lightweight design, it can forge through most terrain with aplomb, feels considerably more stable and protective, and will last hundreds more miles.
To be sure, it’s heavier and stiffer than many modern-day hikers will prefer (you’ll probably be eager to take it off by the end of the day). Also, its Vibram TC5 rubber isn’t as grippy on rock as Vibram Megagrip—although it is more durable. If these are tradeoffs you’re willing to make, the Moab is a strong performer and an excellent value. For more, read our review of the Merrell Moab 3.
Designed specifically for thru-hiking, the Topo Athletic Traverse offers an ideal combination of comfort, structure, and low weight. Most hikers will love the roomy toe box. Our tester put 650 miles into this shoe before noticing a performance drop.
Designed specifically for thru-hiking, the Topo Athletic Traverse offers an ideal combination of comfort, structure, and low weight. Most hikers will love the roomy toe box. Our tester put 650 miles into this shoe before noticing a performance drop.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 5.2 oz.
Waterproof
No
Upper
Synthetic
Outsole
Vibram Megagrip
Pros
Cons
The Traverse is one of the rare shoes actually built for thru-hiking (most thru-hikers use repurposed trail runners), and Topo Athletic hit a home run with the design. In many ways, the Traverse looks like a trail running shoe, but there’s much more going on underneath the hood. Complementing its plush and flexible cushioning (“soft enough that I could feel what was underfoot”) is surprisingly good lateral support—our tester felt stable even loaded down with a 35-pound pack on uneven terrain, and cited the Traverse as one of the most trustworthy lightweight hiking shoes he’s ever used. When the cushion inevitably starts to break down, the Traverse has a rock plate to isolate the bottom of the foot from the trail.
While some trail shoes compromise traction for weight savings, the Topo Athletic Traverse’s outsole is impressively durable and grippy. The combination of the sticky Vibram Megagrip rubber and a thoughtful lug pattern means they perform well in everything from wet and snowy conditions (which our tester encountered in Glacier National Park) to mud (the Bob Marshall Wilderness) and even Class 3 scrambles (in the Pintlers). In his words, “The only places where you might want something else would be steep, technical terrain with small footholds and deep, slick mud, where you might want a shoe with deeper lugs.” And the Traverse is also exceptionally breathable and quick to drain and dry, which is what you want for warm-weather hiking.
All told, the Traverse strikes a nice balance of durability, performance, and weight savings for long pushes on the trail. Of course, it’s not the most stable or protective shoe, but this is a tradeoff most thru-hikers are willing to make for a lightweight design. Our Triple-Crowned tester has learned to expect 400 to 500 miles from his shoes, and the Traverse made it 650 miles in comfort (he even pushed it for 100 more miles to a resupply, although at that point, the cushioning was shot). And with a wide toe box, it’s a great alternative to the Altra Lone Peak for those who want extra space for swollen feet but aren’t interested in a zero-drop shoe. For more, read our review of the Topo Athletic Traverse.
A true trail staple, the Targhee is for folks who like a traditional hiking shoe look and feel, with enough cushioning, stiffness, and protection for day hikes and on-trail backpacking. However, it’s one of the heaviest low-top hikers on the market and feels clunky when covering ground quickly.
A true trail staple, the Targhee is for folks who like a traditional hiking shoe look and feel, with enough cushioning, stiffness, and protection for day hikes and on-trail backpacking. However, it’s one of the heaviest low-top hikers on the market and feels clunky when covering ground quickly.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
2 lb. 6.4 oz.
Waterproof
Yes (non-WP available)
Upper
Leather
Outsole
Vibram Megagrip
Pros
Cons
While most of the hiking footwear industry moves in the direction of lighter and faster, the Targhee IV is here to remind us of where we came from. Unabashedly traditional, the Targhee has a burly leather upper, stiff midsole with a nylon shank, and massive rubber toe cap, creating a safe and stable haven for the feet. Like many standard hiking shoes, the underfoot cushioning is medium-firm, and you get thick cushioning at the collar and tongue for comfort. The Targhee also gets high marks for sustainability thanks to a very durable construction (including a compression-resistant midsole and delamination-free guarantee), PFAS-free waterproofing, humanely sourced leather, and recycled materials.
But the Keen Targhee IV is one of the heaviest and clunkiest low-top hikers we’ve worn, and it won’t be going anywhere fast. The waterproof version noticeably lacks breathability. Unlike lightweight trail running shoes, it takes some time to break in and might cause hot spots or blisters out of the box. While the outsole is very firm and durable, it’s not particularly sticky on rock—our tester found himself slipping more than expected during creek crossings. This is not a shoe we would trust for rocky, off-trail travel. But for folks who derive confidence from the durability, protection, and support of a traditional hiking shoe or boot, the Targhee is a great option. For more, read our review of the Keen Targhee IV WP.
A lightweight build, wide toe box, and flat, slipper-like feel make the Lone Peak popular amongst high-mileage hikers. However, it can feel sloppy and imprecise on off-camber terrain and lacks the plush cushioning of competitors.
A lightweight build, wide toe box, and flat, slipper-like feel make the Lone Peak popular amongst high-mileage hikers. However, it can feel sloppy and imprecise on off-camber terrain and lacks the plush cushioning of competitors.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 6.3 oz.
Waterproof
No (WP available)
Upper
Synthetic
Outsole
MaxTrac
Pros
Cons
The Altra Lone Peak is a trail staple, particularly amongst thru-hikers frequently logging 20-plus-mile days. Long-trail aficionados love it for its slipper-like comfort: The Lone Peak features a lightweight, zero-drop design, an extra wide toe box, and a low-slung stack height of just 25 millimeters (for comparison’s sake, the Speedgoat’s is 40mm), which gives you a close-to-the-ground, barefoot feel. Altra also tacked on a rock plate, dubbed the “Stoneguard,” for added protection underfoot, and ports at the shoe’s arch help it drain quickly after a proper dousing. Durability hasn’t historically been a strong suit of the Lone Peak, but the latest version seeks to amend this with a seamless upper and updated MaxTrac outsole (the outsole surprised us with its improved traction, too). Added up, it’s an ideal design for swollen feet, folks with bunions, and those prone to blisters—we consistently recommend the Lone Peak to friends who have struck out with other hiking shoes, and we’ve yet to lead anyone astray.
Five years ago, it would have been considered heretical to challenge the Altra Lone Peak, but a recent rush of competition has exposed the shoe’s shortcomings. For one, being dubbed the slipper of trail shoes isn’t necessarily a compliment—the Lone Peak feels sloppy and imprecise on off-camber terrain, narrow feet will swim in its roomy toe box, and the minimal cushion can cause foot fatigue. It also lacks the stability necessary for rugged trails and cross-country travel: After bailing off a stormy ridgeline in the La Plata Mountains, our tester slipped and fumbled down steep and loose talus—terrain that her Topo Athletic shoes would have handled with ease. But if you stick to easy trails and don’t mind the roomy toe box and zero drop, the Lone Peak can be a true foot-saver.
An approach shoe by design, the TX4 is protective, stable, and durable, and it offers particularly good traction on rock. The roomy toe box boosts comfort. However, the stiff design is not a great pairing for high-mileage days on established trails.
An approach shoe by design, the TX4 is protective, stable, and durable, and it offers particularly good traction on rock. The roomy toe box boosts comfort. However, the stiff design is not a great pairing for high-mileage days on established trails.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 12 oz.
Waterproof
No
Upper
Leather
Outsole
Vibram Megagrip
Pros
Cons
If your hikes take you into rocky terrain or you like the idea of a durable and protective leather hiking shoe, check out the La Sportiva TX4 Evo. The TX4 Evo is technically an approach shoe—a style of footwear designed for climbers that prioritizes traction on rock, thanks to a sticky rubber outsole and shallow lugs, and climbability, owing to a relatively stiff build and smooth patch of rubber underneath the big toe. The TX4 has been one of the most popular approach shoes for years running, and we’re huge fans: It’s the go-to for most climbers on Better Trail’s staff team, and our co-founder’s 70-plus-year-old parents have even adopted it as their hiking shoe of choice.
One of the standout features of the Sportiva TX4 is its roomy forefoot, which offers excellent comfort for most. The nubuck leather upper is also impressively durable; given that the newest “Evo” version is now resoleable, this shoe can log more miles in its lifetime than almost any hiking shoe out there. And while the TX4 Evo isn’t technically waterproof, you can boost its water resistance with an aftermarket waterproofing spray or wax, which works well for adventures that take you across snow or shallow streams.
But the TX4 Evo isn’t for everyone: Its stiff build isn’t comfortable for high-mileage days, and it's worth noting that the "Evo" is noticably stiffer (even after being broken in) than the previous version. Additionally, the TX4 Evo is heavier than most hiking shoes, and those with narrow feet will find it far too roomy in the forefoot (these folks will be better suited with the TX Guide). As a result, we don’t recommend it for most hikers, and especially not for those who want to move light and fast on smooth trails. But as a durable and protective option for hikers who spend a lot of time above treeline, it doesn’t get much better. For more, read our review of the TX4 Evo.
Salomon’s popular lightweight hiker offers a nice balance of agility, protection, and durability for everything from easy trails to cross-country travel. It’s not as soft and cushioned as a trail runner, and the fit runs narrow, but it’s otherwise a top all-around performer.
Salomon’s popular lightweight hiker offers a nice balance of agility, protection, and durability for everything from easy trails to cross-country travel. It’s not as soft and cushioned as a trail runner, and the fit runs narrow, but it’s otherwise a top all-around performer.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 10.8 oz.
Waterproof
Yes (non-WP available)
Upper
Synthetic
Outsole
All Terrain Contagrip
Pros
Cons
Salomon doesn’t update its celebrated X Ultra line often, but it’s big news when it does. For 2025, we get the fifth iteration of the design, which has gained a serious following among hikers and backpackers thanks to its combination of above-average comfort, stability, and solid protection. The changes aren’t revolutionary, but the new X Ultra 5 GTX features plenty of notable tweaks: a more durable upper, a reshaped and more cushioned collar that addresses a pressure point from the previous generation, and minor changes to the lug shape of the Contagrip outsole. Many of the shoe’s signature design elements remain, including the Quicklace system (a love-it-or-hate-it feature) and a reasonably low weight.
After wearing the Salomon X Ultra 5 under the weight of an overnight backpacking load, our tester came away impressed. This shoe is tough and very supportive yet decently light, and its midsole hits a nice middle ground of shock absorption without resorting to an overly tall—and less stable—shape. The aggressive outsole’s deep lugs dig in nicely and are trustworthy in steep terrain, although it can’t quite match the stickiness of Vibram’s Megagrip compound found on alternatives like the Hoka Anacapa 2. In addition, the shoe leans more towards stability over the kind of cushy comfort you’ll find in a Hoka or trail running-inspired design. That said, the X Ultra 5’s midsole effectively isolates your feet from rocks and roots, and we didn’t experience any foot fatigue even after full trail days.
The biggest question mark with the X Ultra 5 is fit. Surprisingly, the toe box on the shoe is pretty narrow, which diverges from the general trend in the industry toward high-volume shapes. The shoe worked fine on our tester’s moderately narrow foot, and the performance shape pays dividends in technical terrain where it’s easy to trust. But some folks may need to opt for the wide version or go up a half size to get their desired fit. Outside of that concern, the X Ultra 5 has proven to be a highly capable all-rounder. For more on this shoe, read our in-depth X Ultra 5 review.
Don’t be fooled by the modern aesthetic: The Free Hiker 2.0 is a highly supportive, grippy hiking shoe that can deftly tackle technical, off-camber terrain. But you don’t get extra padding or cushion, and the heavy, stiff build won’t appeal to everyone.
Don’t be fooled by the modern aesthetic: The Free Hiker 2.0 is a highly supportive, grippy hiking shoe that can deftly tackle technical, off-camber terrain. But you don’t get extra padding or cushion, and the heavy, stiff build won’t appeal to everyone.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 13 oz.
Waterproof
No (WP available)
Upper
Synthetic
Outsole
Continental rubber
Pros
Cons
The Adidas Terrex Free Hiker 2 Low has the streamlined look of a trail runner, but don’t be fooled— this is a hiking shoe through and through. The Free Hiker 2’s standout features are its stiff midsole and heel cup, which isolate the foot from the trail and provide a stable underfoot platform. Our tester described it as an agile monster truck: “It just rolls over everything in its path.” Completing the package is a durable synthetic upper (we anticipate it holding up for nearly as long as a leather alternative) and Continental rubber sole, which offers excellent grip on everything from damp dirt to slab and scree.
The Free Hiker 2 Low checks in at almost 2 pounds for the pair, which puts it on the heavy side for a hiking shoe. The stiff heel cup is also a polarizing feature—it could potentially cause hot spots or blisters and doesn’t offer the same plush comfort we’ve come to expect from modern-day hiking shoes. And if you’re looking for a bouncy, cushioned shoe for high-mileage days on easy trails, this isn’t it. But taken together, the Free Hiker 2 Low’s ample support, protection, and grip make it a high-performance piece of footwear for those venturing into technical terrain—similar to an approach shoe but with better walkability (and worse climbability). Of all the shoes we’ve test-driven recently, it surprised and impressed us. For more, see our review of the Adidas Terrex Free Hiker 2.0 GTX.
A legend in the thru-hiking world, Brooks’ Cascadia eats up trail miles thanks to its balanced weight, stability, and grip. Unfortunately, its trail running roots mean you give up toe protection, and the shoe’s thin mesh upper and exposed foam midsole can quickly collect damage.
A legend in the thru-hiking world, Brooks’ Cascadia eats up trail miles thanks to its balanced weight, stability, and grip. Unfortunately, its trail running roots mean you give up toe protection, and the shoe’s thin mesh upper and exposed foam midsole can quickly collect damage.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 6.2 oz.
Waterproof
No (WP available)
Upper
Synthetic
Outsole
TrailTack
Pros
Cons
The Brooks Cascadia 18 may be built for trail running, but we think it’s arguably better suited for fast-moving day hikes and long-distance backpacking. The reason: impressive stability and underfoot protection at a low weight. Unlike other popular trail runners that crossover into the hiking world like the Altra Lone Peak or Hoka Speedgoat, the Cascadia feels at home off-trail and when hauling a loaded-down pack thanks to a stability plate sandwiched between two layers of foam in its midsole. So, rather than flexing aggressively and folding over in off-camber sections, the Cascadia retains its shape, allowing for more comfort and control. Impressively, Brooks managed to stiffen up the shoe without tacking on a ton of weight, and at 1 pound 6.2 ounces for a men’s pair, it’s on par with the aforementioned Lone Peak (1 lb. 6.3 oz.) and Speedgoat (1 lb. 3.6 oz.).
What are the downsides of wearing a trail running shoe for hiking? With an airy, mesh upper and exposed foam along the midsole, they won’t last you as long as more reinforced synthetic (or leather) hiking shoes, and you’re more likely to feel every stubbed toe or rock graze. It’s also true that the Cascadia’s cushioning isn’t super plentiful or plush (it’s 33mm at the heel and is a relatively firm compound, compared to the Speedgoat’s squishy 40mm), which boosts stability but can lead to more foot fatigue for some folks. But we think the Cascadia hits that desirable middle ground between a lightweight trail runner and stable hiker better than most, and it’s no coincidence it’s a consistent favorite among thru-hikers and day hikers alike.
Of note, Brooks recently released the Cascadia 19, which marks a notable departure in the line. Specifically, the new shoes are substantially lighter and feature an all-new (for the Cascadia) nitrogen-infused midsole. For running, we've found they are a leap forward; however, we’re holding out judgment on their hiking prowess till we get more trail miles. We’ll report back then and update this guide.
Lightweight and nimble, the Bushido III excels on rock with impressive grip and agility and is ideal for those who prefer a fast-moving, low-profile shoe over a more supportive hiker. However, its minimal stability and durability may leave some hikers wanting more.
Lightweight and nimble, the Bushido III excels on rock with impressive grip and agility and is ideal for those who prefer a fast-moving, low-profile shoe over a more supportive hiker. However, its minimal stability and durability may leave some hikers wanting more.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 5 oz.
Waterproof
No
Upper
Synthetic
Outsole
FriXion XT 2.0
Pros
Cons
The Bushido III is a tough shoe to categorize. La Sportiva markets it as part of their Mountain Running collection—it’s agile and lightweight to be sure, yet lacks the plush cushioning and rockered sole of most modern trail runners. At the same time, the Bushido is often used as an approach shoe. Its smooth, sticky outsole performs admirably on rock, and its flexible build is a welcome alternative to burlier designs like the La Sportiva TX4 Evo. Durability is a concern, however, as the thin mesh upper wears down quickly when exposed to sustained rocky terrain.
Given its strengths and weaknesses, perhaps the best way to think of the Bushido is as a nimble hiking shoe. It offers a close-to-the-ground, minimalist feel that sets it apart from most lightweight hikers, which tend to mimic plush, cushioned trail runners. Instead, the Bushido prioritizes precision and agility, making it particularly adept on rocky terrain where grip is paramount. The FriXion rubber outsole is on par with Vibram Megagrip in terms of stickiness, providing confidence on everything from dry slabs to wet creek crossings.
That said, the Bushido isn’t for everyone. It wouldn’t be our first pick for long days on smooth trails, where a cushier option like the Hoka Speedgoat would offer far more comfort. It also lacks the protection and durability of beefier hiking shoes, making it less than ideal for heavy pack loads or extended off-trail travel. But for those who prefer a minimalist, agile feel without sacrificing traction on rock—we’ve found it best suited for short, steep summit pushes—the Bushido III is an intriguing option that excels in the right conditions. For more, read our in-depth La Sportiva Bushido III review.
Traction and durability are highlights of this modern-day hiking shoe, built to tackle challenging mountain terrain. The 02 has more cushioning than the first iteration yet is still more stable than most trail running shoes. However, the tightly woven upper decreases breathability.
Traction and durability are highlights of this modern-day hiking shoe, built to tackle challenging mountain terrain. The 02 has more cushioning than the first iteration yet is still more stable than most trail running shoes. However, the tightly woven upper decreases breathability.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 5.4 oz.
Waterproof
No
Upper
Synthetic
Outsole
Vibram Megagrip Lightbase
Pros
Cons
Founded by the undisputed GOAT of mountain running, Killian Journet, NNormal is a small and scrappy footwear brand with two offerings: the minimalist Kjerag and the versatile Tomir 02. Behind everything NNormal does is the belief that durable products are sustainable products—the longer you can keep a shoe on the trail and out of the landfill, the smaller its overall footprint. Thus, one of the Tomir 02’s standout features is its longevity. While most hikers retire lightweight hiking shoes after 300 to 400 miles, the Tomir 02 (which features a Matryx upper with Kevlar) can go 600 and beyond.
The Tomir 02 has a healthy dose of cushioning, which is ever so slightly firmer than that of most trail running shoes and thus less squirrely on off-camber terrain. The Vibram Megagrip Lightbase outsole and thoughtfully shaped lugs offer impressive traction on rock, dirt, and even snow—while navigating granite slabs, our tester found the Tomir 02’s grip to be on par with that of an approach shoe. And while the Tomir is expensive, if you factor in its lifespan, you’ll likely save money in the long run. All told, the Tomir 02 is an ideal trail-runner-meets-hiking-shoe design, more purpose-built for stability and durability than most competing models, and suitable for both on- and off-trail travel. A note on fit: Multiple testers have found that the Tomir 02 runs slightly large, so you might want to consider sizing down a half size.
Keen’s most modern hiking shoe, the Zionic strikes a nice balance—it’s lightweight and cushioned yet still durable and stable enough to tackle most terrain. We think it’s a competitive, versatile option, but those accustomed to trail running shoes might balk at the weight and bulk.
Keen’s most modern hiking shoe, the Zionic strikes a nice balance—it’s lightweight and cushioned yet still durable and stable enough to tackle most terrain. We think it’s a competitive, versatile option, but those accustomed to trail running shoes might balk at the weight and bulk.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 10.9 oz.
Waterproof
Yes
Upper
Synthetic
Outsole
TPU
Pros
Cons
Keen stepped up to meet the modern-day market with its Zionic collection. The Zionic Waterproof hiking shoe keeps the wide toe box Keen is known for but features a more athletic, streamlined profile than we’re used to seeing in its traditional designs. And we really like the result—like the Merrell Moab Speed 2 and Topo Athletic Traverse, the Zionic is durable and stable enough to be considered a hiking shoe (i.e., not a trail running shoe) yet still has an agile and lightweight build that’s ideal for tackling fast, high-mileage days on the trail.
The Zionic has an exceptionally plush underfoot feel that cushions each heel strike and adds noticeable bounce to your step, and the removable insole also features an extra dose of plush foam. Keen tacks on a full-length plate for stability and protection, a generous collar for added stiffness and padding at the Achilles, and a full-rubber outsole. The end result is a comfortable yet capable shoe at home both moving quickly on easy trails and picking its way over boulder fields and scree in the high country. It’s not quite as nimble, athletic, or breathable as a non-waterproof trail running shoe, but it’s more versatile and will last significantly more miles. If you’re on the verge between sizes, we recommend sizing up. For more, read our review of the Keen Zionic WP.
A performance shoe through and through, the Akyra II mixes stability and toughness in a surprisingly low-weight package. The shoe’s aggressive outsole grips exceptionally well on everything from rock to mud, but the firm feel underfoot isn’t particularly comfortable on high-mileage days.
A performance shoe through and through, the Akyra II mixes stability and toughness in a surprisingly low-weight package. The shoe’s aggressive outsole grips exceptionally well on everything from rock to mud, but the firm feel underfoot isn’t particularly comfortable on high-mileage days.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 9 oz.
Waterproof
No (WP available)
Upper
Mesh
Outsole
Frixion XT 2.0
Pros
Cons
La Sportiva makes some of our favorite shoes right now, and the Akyra II is a fun addition to their hiking lineup. This shoe is more specialized than most of the models we’ve tested, with outstanding support and grip in a streamlined shape that’s best suited for hauling a pack through technical terrain. Weighing in only a few ounces more than a trail runner, the Akyra ups the ante with a stiff footbed and raised collar that nearly reaches the ankle. While the taller height can cause some pressure points—it did for our tester—it delivers noticeable performance benefits. Hauling a multi-day load off-trail in Washington’s Cascade Mountains, our tester found the Akyra was far easier to trust than his usual trail running shoes (like the Brooks Cascadia), holding its shape while he was traversing and as he picked his way through boulders.
Flipping the Akyra over reveals its seriously burly outsole, which features tall lugs that bite exceptionally well in snow and mud and a tacky rubber compound that impressed us with its grip while scrambling. Protection is also quite good thanks to a tall rubber toe cap and a sturdy, reinforced heel. For just about all sub-fifth-class use in mountainous terrain, the Akyra is a reliable and trustworthy companion.
If, however, you’re looking for a do-it-all hiking shoe that’s comfortable and flexible for easy terrain and shorter day hikes, the Akyra II is likely overkill. It’s not very soft underfoot—the shoe’s midsole favors stiffness and minimalism over squishy comfort—and the tall collar impacts comfort. (The collar softened over time, but the issue never fully disappeared.) As such, this is a somewhat niche shoe, but for the right user who will enjoy its technical chops, the Akyra II is one that we heartily recommend. For more, read our review of the La Sportiva Akyra II.
The Trail 2650 is stylish hiking shoe at home both on and off the trail. The stiff polyurethane shank, toe and heel reinforcements, and durable suede upper offer more protection, stability, and durability than expected from a shoe of this weight. However, our tester experienced a long break-in period and issues with fit.
The Trail 2650 is stylish hiking shoe at home both on and off the trail. The stiff polyurethane shank, toe and heel reinforcements, and durable suede upper offer more protection, stability, and durability than expected from a shoe of this weight. However, our tester experienced a long break-in period and issues with fit.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 8 oz.
Waterproof
No (WP available)
Upper
Leather
Outsole
Vibram Megagrip
Pros
Cons
Hiking shoes don’t always get high marks for style, but the Danner Trail 2650 bucks the trend with a sleek suede design that’s available in a variety of trendy colorways. It’s not just easy on the eyes: This shoe delivers impressive stability and protection for a relatively low weight, making it a great choice for backpackers or day hikers looking for a step up from a trail runner. In contrast to more minimalist shoes, the Trail 2650 features a stiff thermoplastic polyurethane shank and heel reinforcement, a hefty rubber toe cap to guard against toe stubs, and a thick suede upper that noticeably isolates the foot. We’re also big fans of the Vibram Megagrip rubber outsole, which is impressively tacky on rock (however, the shallow lugs aren’t ideal for soft terrain like mud and wet leaves).
The downside to this robust construction is break-in time: Out of the box, the Danner Trail 2650 is uncomfortable and stiff, with very little give underfoot. The shoe loosens up after about three wears, allowing the sturdy foam and cushy OrthoLite footbed to shine in terms of support and comfort. However, despite having a more stable construction than lightweight shoes like the Moab Speed 2 or Hoka Speedgoat 6, issues with fit might undermine the shoe’s prowess on technical terrain—our tester could not achieve a good lock with the laces. But for a stylish and protective hiking shoe with a long lifespan, the Danner Trail 2650 is a fun choice. For warm-weather hiking, check out the Trail 2650 Campo; for wet conditions, Danner makes a waterproof Trail 2650 Gore-Tex. For more, read our review of the Danner Trail 2650.
One of the original trail-runners-turned-hiking shoes, the XA Pro 3D combines breathable and lightweight materials with a solid, planted feel. The design is archaic compared to modern hiking shoes; it’s not particularly durable or grippy and lacks the plush cushion you want for high-mileage days.
One of the original trail-runners-turned-hiking shoes, the XA Pro 3D combines breathable and lightweight materials with a solid, planted feel. The design is archaic compared to modern hiking shoes; it’s not particularly durable or grippy and lacks the plush cushion you want for high-mileage days.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 6.8 oz.
Waterproof
No
Upper
Synthetic
Outsole
All Terrain Contagrip
Pros
Cons
Now in its ninth iteration, the Salomon XA Pro 3D is one of the original hybrid shoes, designed as a trail runner but since adopted by the hiking community. Unlike most trail running shoes, it has a firm and planted underfoot feel, which is more at home on loose and off-camber terrain than logging eight-minute miles on a smooth trail. Furthermore, the XA Pro 3D maintains a competitively low weight. The shoe rounds it out with that typical Salomon vibe that we know and love from the X Ultra series, including a synthetic upper with zig-zag reinforcements, understated cushioning, and a Quicklace closure.
But with no shortage of competition, we hesitate to give the XA Pro 3D our full stamp of approval. The shoe’s materials are cheap—the interior has a rough, gauzy feel we associate with budget road running shoes—and the thin mesh upper shows signs of wear faster than more durable synthetic designs, especially those that use Kevlar or Cordura. Moreover, the Contagrip rubber outsole isn’t as impressive as Megagrip on rocks and soft terrain. Finally, while we love the ease of Salomon’s Quicklace closure, the XA Pro 3D’s upper has excess material when snugged down, and we experienced an unwanted pressure point where the lace extends across the big toe. All told, the XA Pro 3D was big news a decade ago, but modern designs have more to offer. For more, read our review of the Salomon XA Pro 3D V9.
A functional, no-nonsense hiking shoe that threads the needle between cushy trail runners and tank-like designs. Stable, decently protective, and gets the job done on a variety of terrain. However, we experienced comfort issues, and high-mileage hikers will want more cushion.
A functional, no-nonsense hiking shoe that threads the needle between cushy trail runners and tank-like designs. Stable, decently protective, and gets the job done on a variety of terrain. However, we experienced comfort issues, and high-mileage hikers will want more cushion.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 7.6 oz.
Waterproof
Yes (non-WP available)
Upper
Synthetic
Outsole
Trail Tread Eco
Pros
Cons
Many hikers know Oboz for its traditional, leather hiking footwear, but the Bozeman-based brand has also ventured into fast-and-light territory with its Katabatic LT line. The Katabatic LT Low GTX features a modern, streamlined silhouette that prioritizes speed and agility, yet it retains more structure than most trail-runner-inspired shoes. Bucking the max-cushioned trend, the Katabatic keeps you closer to the ground and employs a relatively stiff midsole, offering a stable platform and helping to reduce foot fatigue on uneven terrain. A burly upper with TPU overlays at the toe and heel adds a layer of protection, giving it more isolation from rocks and roots than a true trail runner.
But despite its promising design, the Katabatic LT Low GTX came up short in a few key areas. Comfort was a letdown: the upper felt stiff and failed to move with the foot, creating awkward pressure points—likely exacerbated by the waterproof Gore-Tex liner. The narrow toe box is also a far cry from the more generous designs trending today, and the overall fit runs tight enough that we’d recommend the wide version for anyone with even slightly wide feet. Traction is another area where the Katabatic falters: Oboz stuck with their in-house outsole, which just doesn’t inspire the same confidence as Vibram’s proven rubber compounds. In side-by-side testing with the Merrell Moab 3—a shoe we’ve previously considered stiff and clunky—the Moab proved more comfortable, with a more flexible upper, wider platform, and better overall construction. We wanted to like the Katabatic—it’s fast, light, and decently stable—but ultimately, it was a miss. For more, read our review of the Oboz Katabatic LT Low GTX.
The self-proclaimed GOAT of trail running shoes, the Speedgoat has massive appeal amongst the fast-and-light hiking crowd. It’s lightweight and comfortable enough to log high-mileage days and no slouch in terms of traction. But the current “6” has a number of shortcomings, and you can get markedly more life out of a dedicated hiking shoe.
The self-proclaimed GOAT of trail running shoes, the Speedgoat has massive appeal amongst the fast-and-light hiking crowd. It’s lightweight and comfortable enough to log high-mileage days and no slouch in terms of traction. But the current “6” has a number of shortcomings, and you can get markedly more life out of a dedicated hiking shoe.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 3.6 oz.
Waterproof
No
Upper
Synthetic
Outsole
Vibram Megagrip
Pros
Cons
The Hoka Speedgoat is one of the most popular trail shoes of all time, highly acclaimed by both trail runners and hikers. There’s much to love about the Speedgoat: Its lightweight and airy design won’t hold you back on high-mileage days, the cushioned midsole helps reduce foot and leg fatigue, and traction on dirt and rock is excellent. For years, we’ve relied on this shoe to do it all, whether we’re out for the day with a running vest or on a week-long backpacking trip in the high country. However, we do have a fair share of qualms with the current “6,” making us question the Speedgoat design as a whole.
Our biggest gripe with the Speedgoat 6 is the short, unpadded tongue that doesn’t provide a buffer between the top of our foot and the knotted laces. It’s uncomfortable even while sitting, and the pressure adds up after a few miles. Second, while the Speedgoat 6 has a whopping 40 millimeters of stack height at the heel, it’s firm, packs out quickly, and offers far less bounce than you’d get with a modern hiking shoe like the Merrell Speed 2 or Keen Zionic. What’s more, it does not drain particularly well, and its durability falls short of a dedicated hiking shoe. We’ve put roughly 300 miles into our pair, and already the foam feels packed out, and the lugs (which were shallow to begin with) are significantly rounded and worn down. Altogether, we have a hard time recommending the Speedgoat 6 over lightweight, hiking-specific alternatives like the aforementioned Speed and Zionic (and the Topo Athletic Traverse, which lasted our tester 650 miles).
The Cloudhorizon is a plush and comfortable hiking shoe characterized by an airy CloudTec midsole. However, the soft cushioning detracts from stability, the midsole holes collect debris, and the thin outsole isn’t very durable. We only recommend the Cloudhorizon for easy frontcountry trails.
The Cloudhorizon is a plush and comfortable hiking shoe characterized by an airy CloudTec midsole. However, the soft cushioning detracts from stability, the midsole holes collect debris, and the thin outsole isn’t very durable. We only recommend the Cloudhorizon for easy frontcountry trails.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 6.2 oz.
Waterproof
Yes (non-WP available)
Upper
Synthetic
Outsole
Missiongrip
Pros
Cons
Most of On’s shoes are characterized by its unique midsole foam, dubbed “CloudTec.” This cloud-like technology functions as you might assume: The open channels compress and rebound with each step, offering all of the benefits of cushioning at a low weight. In practice, it works surprisingly well—the Cloudhorizon shoe feels as plush and responsive as a running shoe and is hands-down one of the more comfortable hiking shoes we’ve tested. Not only that, but its roomy toe-box accommodate our tester’s wide and hard-to-please feet.
But there are some inherent tradeoffs to this design. The midsole holes often collect small rocks (or thorns!), which is about as uncomfortable as getting debris stuck inside your shoe. Second, the ultra-soft cushioning conforms to objects like rocks and roots rather than providing a stable platform on which to stand—ripe ground for ankle rolls and foot fatigue. Furthermore, the lugs are shallow and not super aggressive, compromising traction in wet or loose terrain. And finally, many users complain that the shoes squeak. All told, the On Cloudhorizon is serviceable as a stylish hiker for easy pursuits, such as on maintained park trails, but we don’t recommend it for serious backcountry use. For more, read the On Cloudhorizon WP review.
An approachable design, the Moab Speed 2 combines hiking-shoe-like stability and support with the low weight and rockered style of a trail running shoe. It's comfortable out of the box and adept both on and off-trail. However, it lacks the performance fit and agility you’d get with a trail runner.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Salomon’s popular lightweight hiker offers a nice balance of agility, protection, and durability for everything from easy trails to cross-country travel. It’s not as soft and cushioned as a trail runner, and the fit runs narrow, but it’s otherwise a top all-around performer.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
An approach shoe by design, the TX4 is protective, stable, and durable, and it offers particularly good traction on rock. The roomy toe box boosts comfort. However, the stiff design is not a great pairing for high-mileage days on established trails.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
The North Face Offtrail TR ($179): Mountain Machine
The Offtrail TR is the technical hiker in The North Face’s growing Offtrail collection. Combining a light yet tough upper, moderate stiffness, a snug fit, and an aggressive outsole, this isn’t your typical hiking shoe. As such, it’s not a comfort leader if you’ll be walking on maintained trails and taking your time doing it—the feel underfoot is more supportive than plush. If, however, you’re looking to move quickly in the mountains and over steep, loose, and off-trail terrain, the TR comes into its own. We found it exceptionally easy to trust on everything from squishy bogs and muddy trails to slabby boulders and steep mountain routes. For more, read our review of the Offtrail TR.
Altra Timp 5 ($155): Zero Drop + Plush Cushioning
If you like the natural stride of a zero-drop shoe but don’t need the roomy fit of Altra’s Lone Peak, we recommend checking out the brand’s Timp. We tested the latest Timp 5 and were generally impressed: it feels more confidence-inspiring on challenging, off-camber terrain thanks to a snugger fit, and the thicker midsole adds a nice dose of comfort on long days. It’s also hard to complain about the weight—it’s trail-runner light and won’t hold you back. That said, like most trail runners, the Timp’s thin upper is a concern. We quickly put several small holes in the engineered mesh, and the toe cap began separating prematurely. It was enough to dampen our enthusiasm for an otherwise well-designed and capable shoe. To learn more, see our Altra Timp 5 review.
Stio Ridgecap Low ($159): Stio Has Entered the Chat
Best known for its ski apparel, Jackson-based Stio has jumped into the hiking shoe space with the Ridgecap Low. As with its clothing, the shoe has a clean—dare we say mature—aesthetic, and the build quality is readily apparent with tidy stitching, Vibram rubber, and a sturdy all-around feel. It’s not particularly light at 1 pound 13 ounces, but its hearty construction, medium-thick cushioning, and solid toe cap make it trail-ready. A rock plate and moderately wide base round out the design.
We’re still relatively early in testing, but our initial takeaway has been mixed. On one hand, it appears built to last, and the sticky Megagrip rubber has performed as expected (quite well). Underfoot, the shoe is part sneaker—it’s surprisingly flexy—and part clunky hiker (that wide base doesn’t inspire you to move quickly or break into a jog). The midsole is soft enough, but it won’t be confused with a Hoka. Overall, unless you’re sold on the look and are in the market for a trail-to-town design, we think one of the more capable options covered in our guide above is your better bet.
Our overall rating takes the product’s full picture into account: price, build quality, performance (based on intended use), durability, and more. On the high end of the rating scale are standout hiking shoes with something special to offer, whether they’re the crème de la crème or budget designs that offer a savvy combination of features for the price. If you ask us, most readers should be looking to purchase a hiking shoe with an above-average overall rating—there’s simply little reason not to. That said, hiking shoes with lower overall ratings are still notable enough to have made our list; for various reasons, these might be compelling to users with specific design preferences or those who get out only a few times a year.
Comfort is one of the most important factors when finding the right hiking footwear—it doesn’t matter how grippy or protective a shoe is if you can’t wear it. That said, comfort is a subjective metric and often comes down to fit and personal preferences. In our write-ups above, we give information on sizing and fit (including if a shoe runs narrow or wide, is small for the size, etc.); however, we don’t factor it into our comfort rating unless there are universal complaints.
For our scale, we thought long and hard about what makes a shoe universally comfortable. In the end, it all comes down to this question: Do you want to keep the shoe on when you arrive at camp (or the car), or are you thinking right away about taking it off? Those with plush cushion, a flexible midsole and outsole, and a light feel rank high, while stiff, firm, and heavy shoes get a lower score. These rankings aren’t impartial—we’re implying that we think a lighter, plusher, and more flexible shoe is more comfortable. You might disagree, especially if you spend a lot of time hiking off-trail. For this reason, it’s not bad if a shoe scores a 3 or 4 on our comfort scale—just more information to help guide your decision.
Extremely comfortable, with a plush upper, soft midsole cushioning, flexible outsole, and low weight.
Average comfort. Often stiff and lacking in cushion. May require a long break-in time.
Not comfortable and likely not a great choice for hiking.
One of the primary reasons to opt for a hiking shoe over, say, a Chuck Taylor, is for additional structure. While you don’t necessarily need much support and stability for short walks on pavement, it’s imperative for long days on off-camber terrain. Rather than conforming to every obstacle on the trail, a stable shoe employs a number of strategies—including a shank, external frame, polyurethane plate underfoot, or heel counter—to offer a solid platform and hold your foot steady around the sides and top. Ultimately, the shoe should do the work of navigating the contours of the trail—not your foot. This helps prevent foot fatigue and ankle rolls and instills confidence while forging through difficult terrain.
If you spend much of your time on rugged trails or cross-country terrain (traversing scree slopes, kicking steps in snow, navigating boulder fields, etc.), you’ll likely want a shoe that ranks high for stability and support (or consider a full-on hiking boot). These are generally our top choice for older or less experienced hikers, too. On the other hand, shoes that score lower on our support and stability scale are lighter, more flexible, and more responsive. If you hike on smooth surfaces, are quick and nimble on technical terrain, or aim for big-mileage days, a less structured shoe will be the best match. And like many things, this comes down to personal preference in the end.
Excellent stability and support, thanks to stiff materials and firm cushioning. Ideal for off-trail, cross-country travel. At the lower end of this range are shoes with an ideal combination of structure and flexibility for the majority of trails and even some off-trail terrain.
Average stability and support. Most trail running / hiking shoe hybrids fit into this category. Look for plush cushioning and flexible outsoles and uppers. Should be kept on established trails.
Sub-par stability and support. Most trail runners land here. Will feel maxed out on technical trail or if you’re wearing a heavy pack.
The traction style a hiking shoe offers largely depends on the rubber type, lug pattern, and lug depth. Hiking shoes with tall, well-spaced lugs, for example, excel on wet and loose terrain like mud, leaves, and snow. On the other hand, hiking shoes with particularly grippy rubber and smoother lugs (like we see on the La Sportiva Bushido III, for example) are better for rock. Finally, some hiking shoes pull off impressive all-around performance with thoughtful lug patterning—these are our top picks for trails that include a combination of rocks, roots, dirt, mud, snow, and more. If you frequent easier trails or hike exclusively on one sort of terrain, you can get away with a shoe that scores lower on our traction score; but from our personal experience, aiming for an above-average traction rating will lead to the most enjoyable hiking experience.
Excellent traction on all types of terrain, from rocks and roots to mud, snow, and wet leaves. Vibram Megagrip is a top performer.
Average traction. You might find yourself lacking confidence on rock or wet terrain.
Below-average traction. Not recommended for hiking.
A hiking shoe’s ability to hold up to heavy wear is a function of its upper materials, outsole rubber, and overall build quality. Generally speaking, leather hiking shoes are more durable than those with synthetic uppers, although modern materials like Kevlar (as seen on the NNormal Tomir 02) are impressive in their abrasion resistance. Regarding outsoles, rubber ranges from uber-sticky to uber-durable, and the grippiest shoes aren’t the longest lasting. We’ve also started to see more shoes built with an eye toward resoling, which is a fun feature as long as the upper is sure to last.
We strongly recommend shoes that rate high on our durability scale. With all the buzz around sustainability, one of the best decisions you can make is to buy gear that lasts (and thus stays out of the landfill). The good news is, it’s also kinder on your wallet. But it’s worth noting that durable shoes are often heavier, which isn’t great for weight-conscious hikers. We know many PCT thru-hikers who have chosen to go through six or seven lightweight hiking shoes rather than save money with two or three heavier designs.
Excellent durability, thanks to a burly leather or Kevlar upper, top-notch build quality, and long-lasting rubber outsole. Look for resoleable designs—these can last between 500 and 800 miles.
Average durability due to lightweight and flexible materials—good for 300 to 500 miles.
Poor durability; not a great value if you want a shoe to last you longer than a few multi-day trips.
Hikers’ needs vary when it comes to foot protection—some are willing to hike in minimalist FiveFingers (or even sandals), while others prefer a burly upper that isolates their feet from the elements. Most hikers will want some level of protection against stubbed toes, sharp rocks and roots, and errant hiking-pole plants. The most protective hiking shoes feature generous rubber rands, burly toe caps, solid heel protection, thick rubber uppers, and rock plates or thermoplastic polyurethane (TPU) inserts under the foot; shoes with thinner uppers and fewer reinforcements are lower on the protection scale. While foot protection is personal preference, we like to match our shoe with the type of terrain we’re traveling: For cross-country travel and particularly difficult trails, we prefer a shoe that’s above-average in terms of protection; for easier trails, you can get away with less.
Excellent foot protection thanks to generous rubber rands, a burly toe cap, solid heel protection, a durable leather upper, and a rock plate or TPU insert.
Average foot protection. Great for easy trails but not our top choice for difficult terrain.
Sub-par foot protection. Not recommended for most hiking trails.
Our sustainability rating for hiking shoes takes into account ten different criteria. On the product level, we’re looking for recycled or Bluesign-approved materials, responsible leather (if applicable), and PFAS/PFC-free waterproof membranes and durable water-repellent finishes (if applicable). On the brand level, our criteria include whether the company has a dedicated resale or recycling program, uses recycled or reduced packaging, monitors greenhouse gas emissions, and publishes an annual impact report. Hiking shoes with a high sustainability rating meet a number of these criteria, while those with a lower sustainability rating might meet none or just a few. We also consider the degree to which our criteria are met; for example, 10% recycled materials is not the same as 100% recycled materials. Note that not every sustainability effort by a brand or product fits neatly into our categories. In these circumstances, we may increase or decrease a rating based on these factors. You can find details on these factors in the sustainability drop-down under each product above.
These shoes are among the most sustainable on the market and earn our Better Trail Certified distinction. They often meet most of our sustainability criteria for this category.
These shoes are a good, middle-of-the-pack option for sustainability. They often meet about half or more of our criteria for this category.
These shoes are the least sustainable and have significant room for improvement. They usually only meet about a quarter or less of our criteria.
Leather is known for its durability, making it an excellent choice for a hiking shoe. We’ve had some hikers—namely, the La Sportiva TX4 Evo—that hold up so well that they need a resole before the upper shows any signs of breaking down. Leather conforms to the foot over time, resulting in a comfortable, glove-like fit. It’s also highly water resistant and can be decently waterproof when treated with a leather wax or spray. There are many kinds of leather, but we see split-grain (thinner but less durable than full-grain) and Nubuck (supple, with a suede-like finish) used most often in hiking shoes.
The downside of leather is that it’s generally heavier than synthetic uppers, takes time to break in (you’re more likely to suffer a blister in a leather shoe than a synthetic one), and isn’t particularly breathable. As a result, leather hiking shoes are a great choice for those in search of long-lasting and protective shoes or hikers who get out in cool temperatures. However, they’re not our first pick for warm conditions or those who prize quick movement and agility.
Hiking shoes with synthetic uppers are great if you’re hiking in hot weather or want a lightweight, nimble design. Most synthetic materials aren’t as durable or protective as leather, although modern-day offerings that weave in Kevlar (as seen on the NNormal Tomir 02’s Matryx upper) and Cordura come pretty close. Synthetic materials are also known for their breathability and low weight, and they generally wick rather than absorb moisture (as leather is prone to do). Synthetic hiking shoes are our top recommendation for the fast-and-light crowd and those looking for a modern, lightweight trail solution.
When purchasing hiking shoes, you have the choice between waterproof and non-waterproof designs. Everyone wants dry feet, but waterproof footwear doesn’t breathe well and can easily grow swampy and clammy. Waterproof low-top shoes are particularly prone to water seepage at the ankle—and once water is inside a waterproof shoe, it has no way to drain. Finally, waterproof shoes are generally $10 to $30 more than non-waterproof designs and might tack on a few extra ounces.
Regardless of whether a shoe has a leather or synthetic upper, waterproofing is achieved via a waterproof-breathable membrane, which lines the inside of the upper material. Gore-Tex is the biggest name in waterproofing and offers the most reliable protection, but in-house efforts like Keen.Dry and Oboz’s B-Dry work in all but the most sustained moisture. Regular maintenance is required to keep your waterproof shoe performing well, including cleaning (dirt and grime can clog the pores of a waterproof membrane) and application of products like Nikwax’s Fabric & Leather Proof Spray.
One of the primary downsides of a hiking shoe—compared to a hiking boot—is its vulnerability to collecting debris through the low collar. Depending on where you’re hiking, this could be sand, scree, cactus needles, burrs and seeds, snow, or just plain ol’ dirt. Gaiters are great for keeping your shoes debris-free, and we especially like streamlined offerings like Dirty Girl Gaiters and Altra’s Trail Gaiters. These gaiters pair with any shoe on this list, although they work especially well with those with gaiter attachment points, such as the Altra Lone Peak 9 and Saucony Peregrine 15. If you want an even sleeker solution, look for a hiking shoe with a sock-like upper, which forms a seal around your foot to keep out debris. We don’t include any of these designs on our list, but the La Sportiva Levante and Arc’teryx Vertex Alpine are popular options.
Getting a good lock with your shoe’s laces is important—a loose shoe can move around and cause rubbing, especially at the heel. Most of the shoes on our list above use a standard lacing system that requires you to tie a knot, while Salomon’s models use their one-pull Quicklace. We love the ease and security of the Quicklace system but wouldn’t go so far as to base a purchasing decision off of it. Regarding laces, we certainly favor flat over rounded designs, as the latter are prone to come undone, even when double-knotted.
The midsole sits right on top of the outsole and is responsible for most of the shoe’s cushioning, stability, and underfoot protection. Here, we see materials like lightweight EVA foam, stiff polyurethane foam, and even rock plates. The material greatly impacts the feel of the midsole, from plush and bouncy trail running shoes like the Hoka Speedgoat 6 to stiff, boot-like shoes like the Keen Targhee IV. The former offers great comfort for easy trail miles but will feel squirrely on off-camber terrain, while the latter is stable, protective, and durable. We recommend shoes with flexible midsoles and plush cushioning for well-established trails and experienced hikers who like to move quickly and nimbly; on the other hand, shoes with stiffer midsoles are a great pairing for rocky and rooty trails and hikers who value security and support over agility and weight-savings.
The outsole of a hiking shoe is what touches the ground as you hike. Most outsoles are 100% rubber, designed to provide confidence-inspiring hold on a variety of terrain, including dirt, rock, and snow. Several factors determine how well an outsole performs, including the type of rubber and the pattern and depth of the lugs.
Outsole rubber ranges from sticky and soft (climbing shoes feature the stickiest rubber blends) to durable and firm. Most hiking shoes err toward the durable side of this spectrum, which is sufficient for dirt trails with the odd root or rock. On the other hand, approach shoes and some hiking shoes and trail runners (especially those from La Sportiva and NNormal) strike a balance between durability and traction on rock—these are a great choice for routes that travel above-treeline. Some rubber compounds are specifically made to provide grip on slippery terrain like ice, wet leaves, and snow. In general, you can expect names like Vibram and Continental to deliver confidence-inspiring traction on challenging terrain, while in-house efforts like Oboz’ Granite Peak or Keen’s Keen.Rugged get the job done on trails but aren’t well-suited for cross-country routes.
Additionally, an outsole’s tread pattern and lug depth greatly impact traction. Sharp and long lugs generally offer excellent hold on soft terrain like wet leaves, mud, and snow, while rounded and shallow lugs are well-suited for rock (La Sportiva’s TX4 Evo and Bushido III are great examples of the latter). To offer more versatility, most hiking shoes feature both styles of lugs: It’s common to see sharper lugs on the heel (great for braking on the downhill) and smooth patches of rubber at the toe, known as the “climbing zone.”
Most hiking shoes feature one or a number of components that help to boost support and structure around the foot. Under the foot are plates or shanks: These lie in between the midsole and outsole and are generally made with nylon or a flexible plastic known as thermoplastic polyurethane. Both shanks and plates help with torsional rigidity and side-to-side stability (while keeping the forefoot flexible for an easy stride); plates in particular help to protect your feet from sharp objects on the ground. On the outside of the shoe, manufacturers boost rigidity with components like a frame above the midsole and a rigid heel counter. The external frame increases the shoe’s lateral stability, overall structure, and protection, while the heel counter minimzes the movement of the foot and provides rigidity for heel strikes.
The weight of a hiking shoe impacts your comfort and speed on the trail. In fact, according to a 1984 study by the U.S. Army Research Institute, one pound on your feet is worth five pounds on your back. For this reason, we’re big fans of lightweight hiking shoes, which generally clock in under one-and-a-half pounds for the pair. For example, the La Sportiva Bushido III weighs 1 pound 5 ounces for the pair (read our Bushido III review), while the trail-running-specific Hoka Speedgoat 6 is just 1 pound 3.6 ounces.
However, lightweight hiking shoes have their fair share of tradeoffs. They’re typically less stable, supportive, protective, and durable. These are acceptable compromises if you stick to smooth, hard-packed trails (like the Pacific Crest Trail, for example) and prioritize quick movement. Experienced hikers may choose to take lightweight hiking shoes into more demanding terrain. However, you’ll want a heavier design if you prefer your hiking shoe to offer a solid platform for your feet and keep you well isolated from the elements.
Most hikers will want to size their hiking shoes similarly to how they size the rest of their shoes—you want a good lock at the ankle (so that your heel isn’t rubbing with each step) and a small amount of room in front of your toes. If you’re taking on big days and foot swelling is an issue—or if you like to wear thick socks (which we don’t recommend for summer hiking)—consider sizing up a half-size. We’ve found that hiking shoes made by European brands (including La Sportiva, Salomon, and Salomon-owned Arc’teryx) can run narrow, although there are some exceptions to this rule, which we call out in the product descriptions above. Furthermore, some hiking shoes are available in wide versions.
We have many opinions on waterproof hiking shoes. We generally like them for the cool-weather conditions you find in the spring or fall, when wet feet could pose safety concerns. They protect against small puddles, shallow river crossings, consolidated snow crossings, wet branches, and even light rain. We’ve been grateful for our waterproof hiking shoes on many occasions.
However, more often than not, we opt for non-waterproof footwear. Most of us prefer to hike in the summertime, when wet feet might be more of a relief than a concern (we call it radiant cooling). What’s more, non-waterproof footwear is inherently more breathable than waterproof footwear, which keeps your feet breezy and sweat-free in warm conditions. And if you’re encountering deep water or snow that risks entering your shoe at the collar, you don’t want to be wearing a waterproof hiking shoe—once moisture is inside, it has no way of escaping. For trekking on snow in particular (something we tend to do a lot of in the Pacific Northwest), we’re big fans of a non-waterproof hiking shoe-waterproof sock combo. Rocky Brand's Gore-Tex sock has been our long-time favorite but is now difficult to find in stock; Montbell makes a similar pair in their Gore-Tex All Round High Socks.
This comes down to a matter of personal preference.
We love looking around at what other hikers are wearing on the trail. Often, we’ll see sandals, trail runners, hiking shoes, hiking boots, mountaineering boots—even bare feet—all on the same trail. As an extreme example, one of our co-founders traversed the entirety of the North Cascades wearing trail running shoes, while others would only do so in a pair of full-shank mountaineering boots (like the La Sportiva G-Tech reviewed here). In most instances, what you wear on your feet is truly up to you.
But there are some general rules that will help guide your choice of footwear. When deciding what’s best for you, ask yourself the following questions:
How fast do I intend to move? Do I want to log 20 miles per day, or am I content to cover less ground? Those with loftier mileage goals will benefit from a lightweight trail runner.
How much protection do I want? Will a stubbed toe throw me for a loop, and do I really want to feel every rock and root beneath my feet? Your feet will be much more isolated from the elements in a hiking shoe.
How heavy will my pack be? Even the most skilled hikers won’t want to carry a 50-pound backpacking pack with trail running shoes, as you’ll want a solid underfoot platform (read: not plush cushioning) to handle the extra weight.
What sort of terrain will I be covering? On off-camber terrain, you’ll benefit from a stable hiking shoe. On smooth, established trails, a trail running shoe is the most comfortable choice.
How long do I want my shoe to last? This is a big one. Most trail running shoes will wear down after 300 to 400 miles, while burlier hiking shoes might still be going at mile 1,000.
Finally, we’ll note that the distinction between trail runners and hiking shoes is not black and white. Take the Topo Athletic Traverse: trail runner or hiking shoe? It’s got the cushion and low weight of a trail runner, but the full rubber outsole and stability of a hiking shoe. Not only that, but it’ll last you 650 miles (for more, read our full Traverse review). These hybrids are wildly versatile and among our favorite shoes to recommend.
Compared to other categories of outdoor gear, the price range of hiking shoes is relatively tight. At the low end of the spectrum, the Salomon XA Pro 3D V9 and a host of trail running shoes (like the Brooks Cascadia 18 and Altra Lone Peak 9) come in at $140, while the On Cloudhorizon Waterproof is the most expensive shoe in this gear guide at $190. $50 matters of course, but unlike ski jackets where the price range between budget and high-end can be a factor of four, we tend to think you should focus on the attributes and fit of the various shoes as your deciding factors. A great pair of hiking footwear that suits your needs and keeps you comfortable on the trail has a heckuva lot of value—in some cases, they may last 500 miles or more.
Weight is a primary consideration for many hikers these days, especially those reading this article instead of our take on the best hiking boots. The answer is a little complicated because this gear guide includes a handful of trail runners that are commonly used for hiking, including the Hoka Speedgoat 6 (1 lb. 3.6 oz.) and La Sportiva Bushido III (1 lb. 5 oz.). Coming in at just over one pound per pair is impressive, but it’s worth noting that we rate the Speedgoat and Bushido relatively low in areas like support and stability, protection, and durability. The feathery feel of these shoes makes them excellent for moving quickly and nimbly, but their low weight certainly comes with tradeoffs.
In the category of hiking shoes proper, the good news is you still have plenty of options well below a pound and a half. The Topo Athletic Traverse is the lightest hiking shoe at 1 pound 5.2 ounces per pair, followed by the Altra Lone Peak 9 and NNormal Tomir 02, both of which come in around 1 pound 6 ounces. These shoes are noticeably more capable than a lightweight trail runner, with features like rock plates, more durable uppers, and full-rubber outsoles. Unless you’re headed into off-trail terrain or need a really beefy hiking shoe to help stabilize a heavy load, we think a lightweight hiking shoe is the way to go.
Hiking footwear isn’t quite at the forefront of sustainability in the same way as apparel, but brands are making strides and there are solid options. Our sustainability team did a deep dive into the hiking shoe category and came up with ten total criteria at the product and brand levels. The Hoka Anacapa 2 and Salomon X Ultra 5 lead the pack, highlighted by features including recycled materials, responsibly sourced leather (for the Anacapa), and PFAS-free membranes and DWRs. Every product featured on Better Trail gets a full sustainability analysis (for a breakdown of the X Ultra 5, see our Salomon X Ultra 5 Sustainability Report), and you can prioritize sustainability in your research by selecting in the sort-by drop-down above the product picks.
Similar to deciding between a trail runner and a hiking shoe, the hiking boot versus shoe decision comes down to personal preference. Most of the Better Trail staff hike exclusively in hiking shoes and only step up to a boot for mountaineering objectives that include steep snow or crampon use. On the other hand, we know folks who won’t carry an overnight load without hiking boots on their feet. They are used to their footwear offering above-the-ankle protection, and anything less would feel unsupportive and vulnerable. If this describes you, we've put together a similar article on the best hiking boots.
So, we encourage you to go with what feels good. However, if you’ve never tried a hiking shoe, we think it’s worth a shot. Unless you have particularly weak ankles, a hiking shoe will be more comfortable, especially for most hikers who stick to established trails. And while you’re at it, consider taking some weight out of your backpack, too. We’re convinced that the lighter you are, the more enjoyable a time you’ll have on the trail.
hit the trail
Gear Guide
Best Hiking Boots of 2025
Education
PFAS in Outdoor Gear, Explained
