Best Ski Helmets of 2025
ByMultiple Authors
Updated:
Jan 24, 2025Table of contents
Smith Vantage MIPS ($275)
Giro Ratio MIPS ($120)
Smith Level MIPS ($225)
POC Obex MIPS ($200)
Smith Rodeo MIPS ($95)
Smith Summit MIPS ($235)
Smith Nexus MIPS ($330)
Giro Emerge Spherical ($160)
A long-standing favorite, this premium helmet is about as versatile as they come: durable, comfortable, feature-rich, and a good balance of warmth and ventilation. You pay a pretty penny, but there’s a reason the Vantage is consistently seen on the slopes—it’s that good.
A long-standing favorite, this premium helmet is about as versatile as they come: durable, comfortable, feature-rich, and a good balance of warmth and ventilation. You pay a pretty penny, but there’s a reason the Vantage is consistently seen on the slopes—it’s that good.
Comfort
Warmth
Ventilation
Weight & Bulk
Durability
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 2 oz.
Construction
Hybrid in-mold
Vents
21 (12 adjustable)
MIPS
Yes
Pros
Cons
Smith’s Vantage set the bar high at its release, and it has yet to be topped. The premium helmet is a popular choice for both inbounds and backcountry uses, thanks to its do-it-all nature. The interior is warm and padded, and a Boa fit system wraps around your head comfortably and evenly. With two separate vent sliders and 21 openings distributed around the head, it’s easy to tune the ventilation to the day’s conditions. These are great features, but what sets the Vantage apart is its build quality and refined execution, with sturdy plastics, long-lasting foam, reliable parts, a wide range of color options, and excellent fit and finish. If you’re looking for one helmet to last for multiple seasons of consistent use, from mid-winter resort days to spring-time touring, the Smith Vantage is our top pick.
Price is the biggest impediment, although you can often find old colors at a discount, even during the season. The Vantage also shows its age by lacking a magnetic buckle; while the standard clip is fine and perfectly reliable, you can’t secure it with one hand. Ounce counters may also balk at the Vantage’s 1-pound-2-ounce weight (size medium), as you can find plenty of backcountry-ready models at under a pound. That said, we think the weight is reasonable considering the Smith’s safety suite—including large sections of their energy-absorbing Koroyd material along the top and sides—and tough plastic covering the top half of the shell. The Vantage is a classic case of getting what you pay for, and Smith even offers it in two helmet shapes (standard and round). For more, read our review of the Smith Vantage.
Sleek-looking and with a sturdy polycarbonate shell, POC’s premium all-mountain helmet is a great choice for hard-chargers. It’s not particularly warm or plush inside, but the materials are built to take a knock.
Sleek-looking and with a sturdy polycarbonate shell, POC’s premium all-mountain helmet is a great choice for hard-chargers. It’s not particularly warm or plush inside, but the materials are built to take a knock.
Comfort
Warmth
Ventilation
Weight & Bulk
Durability
Sustainability
Weight
15.9 oz.
Construction
Hybrid in-mold
Vents
11 (3 adjustable)
MIPS
Yes
Pros
Cons
Stockholm-based POC is a company built around safety gear, and its ski helmets have a distinctively solid and confidence-inspiring feel. Its core all-mountain design, the Obex MIPS, is case in point. On paper, the Obex’s in-mold design, which takes up most of the lower and sides of the helmet, would indicate a thin and fragile shell. Instead, it has a substantial polycarbonate exterior that’s dent-resistant—and weighty enough that our hard-charging testers felt confident donning it on gravity-only days. There’s also a section of ABS plastic at the top for added durability in that knock-prone area. And while this is largely subjective, we think the Obex has a stylish and sleek look with its glossy shell, low-profile shape, and hardwearing materials.
For padding, POC took a decidedly minimalist and function-first approach. The cushioning is firm and strategically placed around the interior of the shell to protect you from the hard plastic fit system and liner. Overall, it’s well-executed, and we had no complaints after full days of use, but those who like to be cosseted in comfort will likely find it too bare. For ventilation, the helmet has 11 fixed openings with three slot-like vents at the top that can be closed in wet or chilly weather. We found the openings sufficient for resort days—including active uses like short hikes to inbounds terrain—but it doesn’t match the venting of a backcountry-tuned helmet. On that note, for a lighter and more backcountry-oriented variation, check out POC’s Obex BC MIPS. For more, read our review of the POC Obex MIPS.
The ultimate resort helmet, Smith’s Level mixes a high-end, plush interior with a durable shell and adjustable ventilation system for everyday alpine performance. It’s too heavy and insulated for the backcountry but otherwise a standout in quality, warmth, and comfort.
The ultimate resort helmet, Smith’s Level mixes a high-end, plush interior with a durable shell and adjustable ventilation system for everyday alpine performance. It’s too heavy and insulated for the backcountry but otherwise a standout in quality, warmth, and comfort.
Comfort
Warmth
Ventilation
Weight & Bulk
Durability
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 3 oz.
Construction
Hybrid in-mold
Vents
20 (10 adjustable)
MIPS
Yes (non-MIPS available)
Pros
Cons
Smith’s Level (and women’s Liberty) makes a strong first impression. Not only does it have a high-quality look and solid feel, but the best-in-class interior cushioning is evident the moment you slide it on. The supportive yet plush padding covers the entire shell circumference and received universal praise from our testers, fully isolating you from the MIPS liner and plastic fit system. Warmth is another impressive feature: With the vents closed, we’ve worn the helmet without a balaclava on days dipping into the single digits Fahrenheit. And if you like to take the occasional inbounds hike or want to dump heat on a balmy day, you can open the vents along the top of the lid. For lift-assisted days, it just doesn’t get any better.
Smith’s hybrid in-mold construction combines a lightweight in-mold shell with thicker ABS plastic (known for being strong—more on this in our Anatomy section below) reinforcements over the top portion. This gives the Level good overall durability and dent resistance for the rigors of resort life while keeping bulk in check. The feature-rich and thickly padded design, however, pushes it out of running for backcountry days. Our size medium is a little heavy at 1 pound 3 ounces, and it’s too warm to reliably wear on a spring day or while yo-yoing laps in the backcountry. Smith’s upgraded Vantage is the superior option for those wanting a crossover resort/backcountry helmet. For more, see our review of the Smith Level MIPS.
Smith’s top-flight lid delivers across the board: comfort, safety, durability, features, and style. But it comes with a double-take-worthy price tag.
Smith’s top-flight lid delivers across the board: comfort, safety, durability, features, and style. But it comes with a double-take-worthy price tag.
Comfort
Warmth
Ventilation
Weight & Bulk
Durability
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 3 oz.
Construction
Hybrid in-mold
Vents
24 (18 adjustable)
MIPS
Yes
Pros
Cons
Smith’s Nexus represents the brand pushing in all its chips: This top-of-the-line helmet highlights Smith’s best safety tech and features wrapped up in a stylish and durable package. To start, you get full coverage of its energy-absorbing Koroyd technology (the honeycomb-like material is visible through the vents), and the hybrid in-mold construction is exceptionally durable without a significant weight penalty. Additional niceties include a magnetic buckle that’s easy to use one-handed, and a Boa fit system that secures evenly and comfortably around your head. On the topic of comfort, this was a point our testers kept returning to: The soft-touch interior, premium padding, and unobtrusive fit system make it the most comfortable helmet we’ve tested.
Who is the Nexus best for? Cold-weather resort skiers will likely find nothing to complain about: It’s warm and cozy, and you can seal out the cold with its large ear pads and adjustable vents. Open up those 18 vents via the dual-stage system, and you can dump heat in a hurry while hiking or on a warm day. The one place we wouldn’t wear the Nexus is on a deep backcountry day, but it’s still a suitable option for touring when protection and warmth outweighs the importance of weight. If you can stomach the price tag or time your purchase with a sale period, we think the do-it-all Nexus is well worth the investment. For more, read our review of the Smith Nexus MIPS.
With a soft, warm interior and adjustable ventilation, the Giro Ratio is a great resort lid at a value price. It’s bulkier and won’t have as long of a lifespan as premium alternatives, but it’s among the most versatile budget designs we’ve tested.
With a soft, warm interior and adjustable ventilation, the Giro Ratio is a great resort lid at a value price. It’s bulkier and won’t have as long of a lifespan as premium alternatives, but it’s among the most versatile budget designs we’ve tested.
Comfort
Warmth
Ventilation
Weight & Bulk
Durability
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 6.5 oz.
Construction
ABS
Vents
10 (6 adjustable)
MIPS
Yes
Pros
Cons
While Giro makes more modern-looking and premium ski helmets, we think its best-executed lid is the Ratio MIPS. For a very reasonable $120—and it’s not hard to find past-season colors at a discount—you get all the essentials for resort use. The helmet is surprisingly warm and thickly cushioned around the ear pads, forehead, and sides of the head, and the fleece-like lining gives it a cozy next-to-skin feel. At the top of the shell is a slider that controls six large vents, which is nearly unheard of at this price point (most budget helmets have vents with fixed openings). Combine that with an adjustable fit dial and burly plastic shell, and the Ratio is well-equipped for the rigors of resort life.
Signs of cost-cutting in the design show up over time and following heavy use. Specifically, the fleece-like lining is prone to pilling (mostly a cosmetic issue), and the soft and squishy foam around the ear pads and forehead packs out. And while we appreciate that the Giro has an adjustable fit dial, it’s not all that refined. We found the click wheel hard to use with a gloved hand, and you can’t micro-adjust the Ratio’s fit as well as a slightly spendier alternative like Smith’s Mission. Folks who get out often and prioritize long-lasting comfort and performance may want to search elsewhere, but occasional skiers or those looking to save should have the Ratio on their shortlist.
Blending premium features in a durable shell, the Mod 1 Pro is confidence-inspiring and user-friendly. But its overly stiff ear pads made it challenging to seal out the cold, and the non-adjustable vents impact season-long versatility.
Blending premium features in a durable shell, the Mod 1 Pro is confidence-inspiring and user-friendly. But its overly stiff ear pads made it challenging to seal out the cold, and the non-adjustable vents impact season-long versatility.
Comfort
Warmth
Ventilation
Weight & Bulk
Durability
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 5.7 oz.
Construction
ABS
Vents
6 (fixed)
MIPS
Yes
Pros
Cons
Representing one step up from their entry-level Mod 1 model is Oakley’s Mod 1 Pro. We’d argue it merits getting its own name (or at least a Mod 2 moniker) because you get an entirely different shell construction with the “Pro” model, swapping the standard Mod 1’s thin and light polycarbonate in-mold for a two-piece hardshell. Sliding the Mod 1 Pro on your head instills confidence thanks to the hard plastic exterior and the Boa fit system, which wraps fully around your head. The Boa system is a surprising touch at this price—those 360-degree fit designs are typically found in the $200+ and up space—as is the magnetic Fidlock buckle. Despite being on the heavier end due to the hard plastic build, it’s less bulky and hefty feeling than other budget-oriented models that lack a refined fit system.
With minimal cutouts in the shell that limit ventilation, it’s clear the Mod 1 Pro was built for park and downhill-only riders. On a warm, end-of-season day, we were far hotter wearing the Mod 1 Pro than our fellow skiers sporting the more ventilated Mod 3 and 5. It surprisingly wasn’t that much better on chilly days: The overly stiff ear pads failed to mold effectively to the sides of our face and seal out cold and blowing air. Summed up, the Mod 1 Pro’s price, features, and durability make it a desirable item, but it still has enough of a budget feel with its warmth and ventilation limitations to keep it from being a true standout in the market.
Certified for skiing and mountaineering and with an exceptionally light, packable build, this helmet is a backcountry specialist. It’s our current favorite for big days touring and ski mountaineering, but its minimalist build is out of place at the resort.
Certified for skiing and mountaineering and with an exceptionally light, packable build, this helmet is a backcountry specialist. It’s our current favorite for big days touring and ski mountaineering, but its minimalist build is out of place at the resort.
Comfort
Warmth
Ventilation
Weight & Bulk
Durability
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb.
Construction
Hybrid in-mold
Vents
33 (fixed)
MIPS
Yes
Pros
Cons
Smith’s Summit wasn’t the first backcountry-specific ski helmet made, but it’s arguably the best. Certified for both mountaineering and alpine skiing, it’s light, easy to pack thanks to smart features, ventilates freely, and is uniquely optimized for touring. Specifically, there are slots for headlamp straps, built-in bungees to secure it to a pack, and the fit system folds out of the way. To top it off, the helmet is surprisingly tough thanks to Smith’s integration of ABS plastic alongside its go-to energy-absorbing material, Koroyd. This is no stripped-down, minimalist lid.
For padding, there’s a cushioned strip that rests against your forehead and two more along the top to protect your noggin from the exposed MIPS liner. You don’t get any real insulation from the lining—and take note nothing is covering the ears—but the cushioning helps with moisture wicking should you build up heat.
Listed at 1 pound (our size large is a hair more at 1 lb. 0.2 oz.), the Summit is not a true featherweight. You can trim ounces away with a more pared-down option like the Salomon Mtn Lab (14.1 oz.), or a climbing-oriented design like Petzl’s Meteor (8.5 oz.). And while the shell is dotted with vents and generates a fair amount of airflow, the Summit doesn’t dump heat as efficiently as a shell with gaping openings. (The flip side of that is it doesn’t allow snow and moisture to seep in as easily.) However, for us, the added weight and ever-so-slightly reduced ventilation are fine tradeoffs for a tougher and more featured design. For more, read our in-depth review of the Smith Summit MIPS.
The Smith Rodeo is a modern take on the classic hardshell lid, sporting ABS plastic that meets the Global Recycling Standard and an adjustable fit. But it’s classically bulky and not nearly as refined or comfy as pricier alternatives.
The Smith Rodeo is a modern take on the classic hardshell lid, sporting ABS plastic that meets the Global Recycling Standard and an adjustable fit. But it’s classically bulky and not nearly as refined or comfy as pricier alternatives.
Comfort
Warmth
Ventilation
Weight & Bulk
Durability
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 3 oz.
Construction
ABS
Vents
10 (fixed)
MIPS
Yes
Pros
Cons
The sub-$100 end of the ski helmet market is about as stagnant as it gets, so it’s refreshing to see a new entrant. Slotting above Smith’s venerable Holt is the new-for-2024-2025 Rodeo, which features a host of upgrades. Most notably, you get a MIPS liner and an adjustable fit dial, two features missing on the dated Holt. Plus, the Rodeo is the only helmet on our entire list to feature recycled materials (more on this in our Sustainability section below). Considering it’s only $30 more than the Holt, the Rodeo also strikes us as an excellent all-around value.
Despite its upgrades, it’s important to note that the Rodeo retains many of the downsides common in the budget space. First, its vents are permanently open and will require a balaclava in the cold or donning your hood to block moisture coming in through the holes at the top. Second, the helmet’s thick ABS shell adds bulk and heft, and while the adjustable fit system is a nice touch, you’re not able to get as close or snug of a fit as you get with a pricier alternative. Finally, the padding along the forehead is a little light, and one of our testers complained of pressure points when cinching the fit dial.
Who is the Rodeo best for? If your budget is set for under $100, it’s our current favorite offering: The helmet is super tough with its ABS shell, and the safety and fit upgrades give it the edge over alternatives like the Smith Holt or Anon’s Raider 3. If, however, your priorities are weight and a low-bulk shape, we’ll steer you to the slightly pricier Smith Method ($115 for the non-MIPS version; $145 for the MIPS) and its comparatively feathery in-mold construction. For more, see our review of the Smith Rodeo MIPS.
The mid-range Oakley is a standout value for mixed resort and backcountry use, with high quality parts, adjustable ventilation, and a low weight. While thin padding along the interior and a sticky vent adjuster dimmed our enthusiasm, the Mod 3 is great all-rounder for those who prioritize a light and airy feel.
The mid-range Oakley is a standout value for mixed resort and backcountry use, with high quality parts, adjustable ventilation, and a low weight. While thin padding along the interior and a sticky vent adjuster dimmed our enthusiasm, the Mod 3 is great all-rounder for those who prioritize a light and airy feel.
Comfort
Warmth
Ventilation
Weight & Bulk
Durability
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 1.7 oz.
Construction
In-mold
Vents
30 (24 adjustable)
MIPS
Yes
Pros
Cons
The middle child of Oakley’s helmet lineup, the Mod 3 MIPS packs a quality feature set into a lightweight build. Its in-mold construction helps keep weight in check—our size medium Mod 3 undercuts both our Mod 5 and Mod 1 Pro helmets by about four ounces—and feels light and airy on your head. And, as with all Oakley helmets, the Mod 3 utilizes premium third-party parts: a Boa fit system that wraps fully around your head, a Polartec lining that’s durable and washable, and Fidlock magnetic buckle. Tack on adjustable ventilation—a single slider controls the 24 vents dotting the top of the lid—and the Mod 3 represents a good value at $185 for a helmet that can pull double duty at the resort and backcountry.
If you’re familiar with in-mold helmets, you know the deal: They’re the least durable of the three helmet construction types and don’t have that bomber feel you get with a thicker, ABS plastic-reinforced lid. Specific to the Mod 3, we were also let down by the quality of the vent slider on the top of the helmet, which is overly stiff and nearly impossible to manipulate without removing your gloves. Besides that, it’s worth noting that Oakley’s thin padding and somewhat narrow fit can cause pressure points if the shape doesn’t work for you, but Oakely offers the Mod 3 MIPS in a wider, Round Fit version for the same price.
Slide on and drop in: Oakley’s top-end lid is sturdy, protective, and stylish. But the firm, high-density foam and minimalist interior padding mean it’s less of a resort all-rounder than expected.
Slide on and drop in: Oakley’s top-end lid is sturdy, protective, and stylish. But the firm, high-density foam and minimalist interior padding mean it’s less of a resort all-rounder than expected.
Comfort
Warmth
Ventilation
Weight & Bulk
Durability
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 6 oz.
Construction
Hybrid in-mold
Vents
11 (adjustable)
MIPS
Yes
Pros
Cons
Given its long-standing dominance in ski goggles, we’ve been surprised by how long it’s taken for Oakley to build out a deep roster of ski helmets. Their current Mod collection has three main models—the 1, 3, and 5—with the top offering being the Mod 5 MIPS. As expected for a helmet costing nearly $300, you get a lot: Hybrid construction for durability without a big hit to bulk, adjustable ventilation, and premium features like a Boa fit dial that cinches around the full head circumference, ventilated Polartec lining, and magnetic buckle. We think the styling is very on-brand for Oakley, with a space-age yet clean look that pairs nicely with one of their large goggles like the Flight Deck L.
Comfort-wise, we have mixed feelings with the Mod 5; it lands on the less cushioned end of the spectrum. The good news is that key areas like the forehead and back of the head are sufficiently reinforced with thick foam to avoid pressure points. Plus, the large ear pads cup the sides of your head effectively while offering additional protection around your jaw bone. But the high-density padding is quite firm—our tester said the overall feel was reminiscent of a ski racing helmet—and lacks the plush and soft feel common in a resort-oriented lid. This gives the Mod 5 less leeway to folks who don’t fit its shape perfectly—the helmet runs a little narrower than average and noticeably narrower than Smith—but the snug and secure set-up does boost confidence when dropping into difficult terrain.
This helmet’s function-first looks make it stand out in a crowd, but the Switcher packs a punch. Its hybrid shell is sturdy, and you get full control over 22 vents. The one hangup is the interior: its narrow shape will limit comfort for some, and the minimalist padding isn’t our fave.
This helmet’s function-first looks make it stand out in a crowd, but the Switcher packs a punch. Its hybrid shell is sturdy, and you get full control over 22 vents. The one hangup is the interior: its narrow shape will limit comfort for some, and the minimalist padding isn’t our fave.
Comfort
Warmth
Ventilation
Weight & Bulk
Durability
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 5.2 oz.
Construction
Hybrid in-mold
Vents
26 (22 adjustable)
MIPS
Yes
Pros
Cons
Like POC, Sweet Protection is a safety gear-focused brand primarily playing in the skiing and cycling markets. Also like POC, its gear features distinctive styling. In the case of its Switcher MIPS helmet, the look is tactical-like, with a hardshell exterior, small vents dotting the front and sides of the helmet, and features that have an overbuilt look and feel to them. The ear pads are a great example: The exterior is reinforced for extra protection, the chin straps that wrap over the padding are secured with buttons (something you rarely see), and there’s a speaker-like cutout in the middle to help with noise transfer. The busy and tough look is a little polarizing—our testers were mixed with the styling, and it certainly doesn’t match POC in sleekness—but the helmet itself is confidence-inspiring and clearly well-made.
One of our favorite features of the Switcher is its venting system. Not only do you get control over the 22 vents, but you can micro adjust the opening of 20 of them via a dial at the back of the helmet. Functioning just like the fit adjustment system, a twist in either direction will open or close the vents, dumping an impressive amount of heat. Separately, you can open two vents at the forehead simply by sliding them open or closed. Combined with a minimally padded interior, it’s pretty easy to avoid overheating with the Switcher on the mountain.
Our biggest issue with Sweet Protection helmets is their fit and comfort. No single helmet is going to fit all head shapes, but some are more versatile than others. For our testing team, the Switcher was one of the least versatile, with a narrow fit that works best with oval-shaped heads. If it runs narrow for you, you’ll know right away, as the thin padding on the sides of the head means the hard foam interior presses into you uncomfortably. If they offered a round-fit version—like Smith does with many of their popular models—we’d be able to overlook this issue. As it is, the Switcher is a well-built and excellent lid for those who prioritize ventilation and durability, but its polarizing shape is limiting.
Light and low profile, the Smith Method bucks the trend of large and bulky entry-level lids. You also get Smith’s premium energy-absorbing Koroyd and a cozy interior, but we missed having a micro-adjustable fit system.
Light and low profile, the Smith Method bucks the trend of large and bulky entry-level lids. You also get Smith’s premium energy-absorbing Koroyd and a cozy interior, but we missed having a micro-adjustable fit system.
Comfort
Warmth
Ventilation
Weight & Bulk
Durability
Sustainability
Weight
14.1 oz.
Construction
In-mold
Vents
8 (fixed)
MIPS
Yes
Pros
Cons
Of the three ski helmet construction types, in-mold designs are the lightest and lowest profile. These lids integrate the polycarbonate shell and foam from the beginning, and the one-piece set-up significantly reduces bulk compared with two-piece ABS designs. Smith’s popular Method is a great example, undercutting similarly built ABS helmets in weight by five ounces or more—a difference that’s immediately noticeable and appreciated throughout a ski day. Along the back, the Method also tacks on a section of Smith’s Koroyd material—designed to increase energy absorption in a crash and typically found on helmets costing $200 and up. Along with a fleece-like lining along the ear pads, forehead, and chin strap, the Method is the kind of helmet that quickly fades into the background on the hill.
At $140, the Smith Method represents a step up from the true budget zone (roughly $120 and under). And those upgrades are noticeable in the softer lining, Koroyd tech, and lower-profile build. But the helmet lacks adjustability for the venting system and fit. In testing the helmet on a windy day in temps in the low 20s, we were surprised with how quickly we got chilly. The two vents in the shell right at the forehead were largely to blame, as they allowed air to hit our forehead unimpeded (we recommend pairing the helmet with a beanie or balaclava on all but the warmest days). Plus, while the elastic strap at the back does allow the helmet to stretch to fit your head, it’s a far cry from the snug fit that a twist-dial system allows.
Totaled up, the Smith Method met our expectations. It’s a great option for resort riders who will value its light feel and cozy interior, but you make some fit and feature compromises in keeping the price in check. It’s also worth considering if you want an in-mold helmet at all: They’re more prone than ABS or hybrid helmets to collecting dents and dings due to their thin exteriors, and the Method leaves some of its brittle foam exposed right under the brim. One final note here: Smith recently released the Method Pro, which tacks on an adjustable fit system and a magnetic chin buckle for another $20.
A feature-packed resort lid, the Atomic sports clean styling, a highly adjustable fit system, and impressive proprietary safety tech. But its non-adjustable vents and bulbous look disappointed us.
A feature-packed resort lid, the Atomic sports clean styling, a highly adjustable fit system, and impressive proprietary safety tech. But its non-adjustable vents and bulbous look disappointed us.
Comfort
Warmth
Ventilation
Weight & Bulk
Durability
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 3 oz.
Construction
Hybrid in-mold
Vents
6 (fixed)
MIPS
AMID
Pros
Cons
Atomic’s ski and boot lineups get most of the brand’s publicity, but it also has a sneaky-large range of helmets and goggles. Their Four AMID Pro targets the all-mountain crowd with a comfy, merino wool-lined interior and highly adjustable fit system. The fit system immediately impressed our team with its ability to cinch evenly around your head circumference and up and down. Further boosting comfort is a foam layer wrapping around the forehead and to the back of your ears. This wide foam strip is connected to the fit system and wraps uniformly, giving the helmet a custom, cushioned feel as you cinch it down.
For safety tech, Atomic opted to buck the MIPS trend and develop its own multi-directional impact system. Peeling back the helmet’s liner reveals a series of eight multi-colored, multi-density foam pads along the top and sides of the helmet. These pads are designed to move independently of the shell in a crash, redirecting energy away from the head. There are also substantial cutouts in the EPS foam that crumple at impact and absorb energy. As with most helmet safety tech, there isn’t a standardized test to establish how effective a given system is, but the AMID pads and the foam cutouts go largely unnoticed while you’re wearing the helmet.
We were disappointed, however, that the Four AMID Pro doesn’t offer an adjustable venting system, which struck us as an oversight at this premium price point. On a windy day of testing, with temperatures in the low 20s Fahrenheit, we were surprised by how drafty the helmet felt. A second complaint is that, while we like the Four’s styling, its thick shell gives it a round and large look. That may be personal preference, but those who prefer low-profile styling will likely be put off. Of note: Atomic also offers the Revent GT AMID ($260), which has a lower-profile shape and adjustable vents. We’ll be testing the Revent this winter and will update this roundup once we grasp its performance.
A freeride and terrain park-oriented helmet that’s durable and integrates unique safety tech like MIPS’ two-piece Spherical system and multi-density EPP foam. While it feels solid and capable of taking a knock, the lack of an adjustable fit system is a miss.
A freeride and terrain park-oriented helmet that’s durable and integrates unique safety tech like MIPS’ two-piece Spherical system and multi-density EPP foam. While it feels solid and capable of taking a knock, the lack of an adjustable fit system is a miss.
Comfort
Warmth
Ventilation
Weight & Bulk
Durability
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 1.5 oz.
Construction
ABS
Vents
10 (fixed)
MIPS
Yes (Spherical)
Pros
Cons
Built for the park and cliff-hucking crowd, Giro’s Emerge is uniquely constructed. First, its dual-density EPP foam differs from standard EPS (found on all other helmets that made our list) in that it can rebound and potentially protect from multiple impacts. That said, it’s always wise to replace your helmet after a hard crash in case any damage has been done to the foam. The second novel piece on the Emerge is its MIPS Spherical system, which utilizes a ball and socket connection to integrate the slip-plane technology right into the shell (rather than a separate liner). And the technology is well-integrated without a weight or bulk penalty.
At $160, you pay a premium for the aforementioned safety features, but the rest of the helmet has a decidedly budget feel. The first issue we ran into was getting a secure fit, as the helmet lacks a twist-style adjustment system; instead, you get multiple sizing pads for the interior and ear covers. While this is better than nothing, we couldn’t get as snug of a fit as we wanted (and as we got with the Bern Macon 2.0, which we were testing alongside the Emerge). Tack on the minimal venting along the shell, which made it run hot in mild temps, and we’re overall muted in our enthusiasm for this otherwise impressive lid.
Direct-to-consumer Glade makes a strong case with its lightweight and airy yet feature-rich Boundary, which is equipped for crossover resort and backcountry use. But we were let down by the interior comfort, and the thin build wasn’t confidence inspiring for hard-chargers.
Direct-to-consumer Glade makes a strong case with its lightweight and airy yet feature-rich Boundary, which is equipped for crossover resort and backcountry use. But we were let down by the interior comfort, and the thin build wasn’t confidence inspiring for hard-chargers.
Comfort
Warmth
Ventilation
Weight & Bulk
Durability
Sustainability
Weight
15.4 oz.
Construction
In-mold
Vents
16 (10 adjustable)
MIPS
Yes
Pros
Cons
Glade’s high-value photochromic ski goggles put it on the map, and the brand has since expanded into the helmet space. The Boundary is its current top-flight option (there’s also the $129 Tenmile), and it packs a full list of features into a relatively feathery package. Our medium size tips the scale at just 15 ounces but includes niceties like two separate vent adjusters that control ten openings, a magnetic buckle, a twist-dial fit system, and a small brim. There’s plenty of ventilation for high-output uses like hiking or throwing on the lid after a long session on the skin track, and its weight is low enough to haul around on a pack. Surprisingly, however, unlike Glade’s goggles it’s not cheap, but the $199 price is still competitive with alternatives like the POC Obex MIPS ($200).
The Boundary adds up nicely on paper, but both of our testers were let down in real-world testing; they had challenges getting a reliably comfortable fit. While the padding along the interior has a quality feel, it isn’t securely attached to the shell and is prone to moving around and exposing the interior’s hard plastic pieces. This was particularly noticeable for our tester who landed on the smaller end of the fit range. Cinching it down pushed the fit system’s plastic arms between the padding and into the side of her head. The padding on the ear flaps was also a letdown: both testers found them too small to seal comfortably around their ears.
As is probably apparent, we have mixed feelings about the Glade Boundary. On the one hand, it’s impressively lightweight given its extensive feature set; on the other, we have two accounts of folks not finding it particularly comfortable, and you can’t try it on before buying. There’s also the thin in-mold construction to consider, which isn’t as durable as alternatives like the Smith Level or POC’s Obex MIPS. All that said, if it fits you and you want a do-it-all resort and backcountry lid, the Glade is worth a look. For more, see our review of the Glade Boundary MIPS.
Direct-to-consumer Glade makes a strong case with its lightweight and airy yet feature-rich Boundary, which is equipped for crossover resort and backcountry use. But we were let down by the interior comfort, and the thin build wasn’t confidence inspiring for hard-chargers.
Comfort
Warmth
Ventilation
Weight & Bulk
Durability
Sustainability
Sleek-looking and with a sturdy polycarbonate shell, POC’s premium all-mountain helmet is a great choice for hard-chargers. It’s not particularly warm or plush inside, but the materials are built to take a knock.
Comfort
Warmth
Ventilation
Weight & Bulk
Durability
Sustainability
The Smith Rodeo is a modern take on the classic hardshell lid, sporting ABS plastic that meets the Global Recycling Standard and an adjustable fit. But it’s classically bulky and not nearly as refined or comfy as pricier alternatives.
Comfort
Warmth
Ventilation
Weight & Bulk
Durability
Sustainability
Scott Flow Pro MIPS ($230): Scott’s New Freeride Lid
Scott’s recently discontinued Symbol 2 Plus D used to sit atop the brand’s helmet lineup, but it’s been replaced by the Flow Pro MIPS for winter 2025. And while we’ll miss some of the Symbol’s innovative features—including the energy-absorbing D30 foam built into the shell—the new Flow looks promising. One notable change is the swap to a MIPS liner, which should address one of our main complaints with the Symbol: Its thick shell and bulky shape. The Flow Pro is also competitively light at just over 1 pound, and its feature set lines up nicely for a $200-plus helmet, including a magnetic buckle, twist-dial fit system, and built-in RECCO reflector.
We have some questions about the Flow Pro's small vents, as we find those less versatile than large, closeable openings that can either dump heat while hiking or close to seal out the chill. But we’ll report back on that once we put the new Scott lid through the wringer.
Smith Method Pro MIPS ($165): A Smartly Upgraded Method
The standard Method MIPS is featured in our picks above, and Smith released a new “Pro” variation this season. For $20 more, the upgrades are notable: An adjustable fit system (something the standard Method lacks), a more sculpted ear pad shape, and a magnetic buckle. Of all the changes, we’re most enthused about the fit system, as we’ve found it hard to dial in an even, snug fit with the standard Method MIPS.
We’re also pleased to see that Smith retained a lot of the goodness that has made the Method such a hit, including its low-profile in-mold construction, very low weight, and clean look. The Method Pro also comes with similar downsides like relatively poor durability (the thin shell is prone to picking up dents and scuffs) and fixed vents (they’re permanently open), which means you need to wear a balaclava for protection in chilly temps. Totaled up, the Method Pro isn’t without its compromises, but we think it’s one of the better sub-$200 designs currently available. For more, read our Method Pro MIPS review.
Our overall rating takes the product’s full picture into account: price, build quality, performance (based on intended use), durability, sustainability, and more. On the high end of the rating scale are standout ski helmets that have something special to offer, whether they’re the crème de la crème models or budget designs that offer a savvy combination of price and performance. If you ask us, most readers should be looking to purchase a ski helmet with an above-average overall rating—there’s simply little reason not to. That said, helmets with lower overall ratings are still notable enough to have made our list; for various reasons, these might be compelling to users with specific design preferences, beginners that may not stick with the sport, or those who get out only a few times a year.
Our comfort rating considers several factors, but the core question is: How comfy is the helmet to wear all day? The padding along the interior plays a key role, and top-rated products feature cushioning that’s thick and supportive enough to isolate you from the shell and fit adjustment system. Ear pad comfort is also a consideration, and cheap foam or a lack of padding can lead to discomfort as the hours wear on. Above all, getting a proper fit can make or break how comfortable a helmet is for you. And while not every helmet will match your exact head shape, we give favorable marks to highly adjustable helmets—both in circumference and height—and if multiple helmet sizes and shapes are offered.
Standout comfort with premium cushioning, soft-touch materials, and a barely-there feel. Earning a perfect score means the helmet has a highly adjustable fit system that allows you to tailor the fit, and multiple sizes and shapes are offered.
Good but not standout comfort. Padding along the interior may be sparse, but the strategically placed cushioning avoids pressure points or general discomfort. Limited size options, and there may be may have no way to micro-adjust the fit.
Enough red flags that we’d highly recommend trying on before purchasing. Issues could include poor padding quality or non-existent cushioning, a polarizing shape, or a one-size-fits-none design.
This rating represents the maximum possible warmth a given helmet offers when worn over a bare head. Warmth factors include the thickness of the cushioning around the head and ears, the number of vents and openings in the shell—and whether or not the vents can be closed—and how well the helmet seals in heat. Having the warmest possible helmet may not be a good thing, depending on your level of activity, local conditions, and more. To see the full picture of a helmet’s temperature range—which will correspond with its best use(s)—make sure to also factor in its ventilation score.
Medium to high levels of cushioning and a shell design that effectively seals in heat. Most downhill skiers will find the helmet comfortable without an additional layer in low-teens to low-20s Fahrenheit.
Light cushioning and insulation from the cold. It may not be possible to close the vents and seal out chilly air, and most skiers will want a balaclava or additional layer for downhill skiing in the low-20s Fahrenheit or below.
Large vents that cannot be closed and little to no insulation along the interior.
Ventilation from your ski helmet is valuable for various reasons, from needing to release hot air while bootpacking up a couloir to regulating temperature if a day at the resort turns sunny and warm. Like the “warmth” category above, a given helmet’s ventilation rating represents its most ventilated option in the helmet’s “stock” setting: the adjustable vents are fully open, but no padding has been removed.
Exceptional ventilation that’s suitable for accessing hike-to inbounds terrain and skiing on sunny, above-freezing days at the resort. Top scorers here are also great for backcountry use.
Some vent openings, but the helmet may cause overheating when you’re active or in above-freezing temperatures.
Minimal to no openings in the shell and greatly limited airflow.
We combined weight and bulk into a single rating to provide insights into both how much the helmet weighs and how it will feel on your head. Weight and bulk closely align with your intended use: A dedicated backcountry helmet should be extremely light and easy to haul, while a helmet intended for high-speed downhill use or the park should be heftier and prioritize protection. Generally, weight will also correlate with the construction type: in-mold helmets are the lightest and lowest profile, hybrid in-mold are in the middle, and ABS plastic lids are the heaviest, and their thick designs mean you’ll feel the extra mass sitting further off your head.
Lightweight and low-profile in-mold helmet that can pull double duty at the resort and backcountry. Weight is close to one pound or under for a men’s medium size.
A helmet primarily intended for resort use that’s noticeable when placed on your head but likely won’t cause fatigue during the day. Weight is between one to one and a half pounds for a men’s medium, and typical construction is hybrid in-mold or a thin ABS shell.
Thick ABS plastic helmet that immediately feels bulky and hefty when worn. The oversized shape impacts comfort and mobility.
The durability of a shell largely depends on its construction type. The most durable designs feature a thick ABS plastic shell that’s highly resistant to cosmetic damage. (Note: this doesn’t guarantee the foam underneath hasn’t cracked; you’ll always want to inspect your helmet after a crash or hard impact.) Next up are hybrid in-mold helmets with large sections of ABS plastic at the top—nice for protecting the foam from branches. The least durable are in-mold designs that simply feature a thin layer of polycarbonate over EPS foam. A secondary consideration is the longevity of the cushioning, liner, and fit system. Thin or cheaply made products prone to breakage will negatively impact the score.
Helmet utilizes ABS plastic on the shell that’s highly resistant to cosmetic damage and rough use. Also has long-lasting cushioning and a durable feature set.
Hybrid in-mold construction (or similar) that features sections of tough ABS plastic along the top of the helmet and lightweight in-mold at the sides. Some standard in-mold helmets also score at the low end of this range. The in-mold designs are not as confidence-inspiring and more susceptible to dents compared to ABS plastic alternatives, but good enough for average resort and backcountry use.
Thin in-mold helmet that leaves sections of its EPS foam exposed. Cheap interior foam packs out with use, and the fit adjustment system is prone to breakage.
On the whole, ski helmets have fewer sustainability features than other product categories. Our ratings for ski helmets take into account four different sustainability criteria. We are looking to see if the product is made with recycled materials and if the brand uses recycled or reduced packaging, monitors greenhouse gas emissions, and publishes an annual impact report. We also consider the degree to which our criteria are met; for example, 10% recycled materials is not the same as 100% recycled materials. Note that not every sustainability effort by a brand or product fits neatly into our categories. In these circumstances, we may choose to increase or decrease a rating based on these factors. You can find details on these factors in the sustainability drop-down under each product above.
These helmets are among the most sustainable on the market and earn our Better Trail Certified distinction. They often meet most of our sustainability criteria for this category.
These helmets are a good, middle-of-the-pack option for sustainability. They often meet about half or more of our criteria for this category.
These helmets are the least sustainable and have significant room for improvement. They usually only meet about a quarter or less of our criteria.
All ski helmets feature an energy-absorbing foam liner and hard exterior, but they are built in distinctive ways that impact their weight, bulk, durability, and price.
ABS Plastic Hardshell: Cheap and Tough
ABS helmets are a classic choice for budget-seekers and park riders—they’re tough, cheap to make, and their burly constructions are confidence-inspiring when you’re pushing the limits (and they won’t cost you $300 to replace if you take a fall). These helmets feature a hard plastic exterior (hence the ABS plastic in the name) glued to a foam liner. The construction is affordable, and the plastic shell does a great job limiting dents and other cosmetic damage.
Unsurprisingly for a budget item, there are some compromises with this construction type. The two-part construction—shell plus foam—makes these helmets the bulkiest and heaviest on the market. Visually, the helmets look large, and you can feel the extra heft when wearing them. If you want a sleek and low-profile helmet or plan to use it for touring or even hiking to inbounds terrain, we recommend an in-mold or hybrid in-mold build (covered below). But if toughness and price are your priorities—there are many options at or below $150, including the Giro Ratio ($120)—ABS is the way to go.
In-Mold: Lightweight and Low Profile
If you pick up an in-mold helmet after an ABS design, the difference in weight and feel is night and day. Whereas the ABS helmet is thick and burly, an in-mold helmet is light and somewhat flimsy by comparison. This is by design: In-mold helmets are a one-piece affair, with their thin polycarbonate shells integrated into the EPS foam liner from the beginning (i.e., not glued on like ABS). This helps keep weight down—in-mold helmets often weigh 5-8 ounces less than ABS lids—and gives them a significantly lower-profile look.
As with most lightweight products, durability is your primary concern. The polycarbonate shell is more prone to dents and cosmetic damage if you’re tree skiing or hitting features in the park. And even though they pass the same standard tests for alpine skiing, the light and thin shell doesn’t inspire as much confidence as ABS-reinforced helmets for hard-chargers or those who push the limits on- and off-trail. That said, for standard resort laps and ski touring, in-mold helmets are a very popular choice thanks to their barely there feel and reasonable price (most in-mold helmets are between $100 to $200).
Hybrid In-Mold: A Premium Compromise
As their name suggests, hybrid in-mold helmets are a combination of the two aforementioned construction types. Their lower half is in-mold, giving them a sleek look and often reasonable weight. But the upper features ABS plastic (or a similarly tough material) to boost durability in the zone most prone to taking a knock from a branch or worse.
The more complex construction in a hybrid in-mold design directly affects its MSRP. The vast majority of models cost over $200, including Smith’s popular Level MIPS ($225) and Vantage MIPS ($275). You’re also adding a little weight with the ABS plastic, which makes them less appealing for uphill enthusiasts and those heading beyond the resort boundaries. But there’s a reason you see so many Smith Vantages on the hill—their premium mix of toughness and low weight and bulk are worth the investment for many.
Ventilation systems on helmets play two important roles: keeping your head cool while skiing and encouraging airflow through your ski goggles. Starting with the latter, most helmets have openings on the underside of the brim that continue through the top of the shell, which helps air move up through your goggles like a chimney. The goal of this system is to limit fog buildup along the inside of your goggle’s lens.
The vents found elsewhere on a helmet are all about regulating your temperature while skiing. Designs vary widely, from several small cutouts at the top or back of the helmet to 20-plus openings that can generate a whole lot of air movement. Additionally, the vents are either fixed (always open) or adjustable, allowing you to close them in especially chilly weather or snow and rain. In our specifications for each product, we list the total number of vent openings and whether or not the vents are adjustable.
Whether or not a ventilation system is important to you will largely depend on your intended uses. Active skiers who hit the backcountry or wear their helmets while hiking to inbounds terrain at the resort will want generous openings like those found on Smith’s touring-specific Summit that allow you to dump heat. And if you plan to wear your helmet at the resort all season long—including on chilly and low-output days—you’ll likely also want to be able to close off those vents to maximize warmth. That’s where an adjustable and highly ventilated system like the ones found on Scott’s Symbol 2 Plus or Glade’s Boundary has appeal (read our Glade Boundary Review here). On the other hand, if you’re a downhill skier who runs cold, spends a fair amount of time in the park, or rarely builds up heat on the mountain, you can get away with minimal venting like that found on Oakley’s Mod 1Pro or Giro’s Emerge.
This one is self-explanatory: Ski helmets are made of hard foam and plastic, so it’s essential to add some padding along the interior for comfort and to offer additional cushioning in an impact. The amount of padding varies by model, but most include a foam strip along the forehead that wraps around the sides and back of the head. This helps limit pressure points and general discomfort that could be caused from direct contact with the helmet’s fit system, a MIPS liner (more on this below), or any other hard plastic or foam pieces along the interior.
Helmets tuned for the resort will often feature a full, one-piece liner covering the entire interior of the helmet. This offers a boost in warmth and a cozier feel for wearing all day. Backcountry helmets or those intended for active use often utilize thinner or more strategically placed padding, such as thin strips along the top of the helmet that cushion your head slightly without compromising ventilation.
The vast majority of ski helmets include cushioned ear pads, which offer warmth and protection in a crash. Similar to the helmet’s interior cushioning, the designs range from minimalist to thick and cozy. For resort skiing, particularly if you live in an area known for frigid temperatures or if you run cold, it’s worth getting a ski helmet with thick ear padding. Well-executed designs like the ones on Smith’s Level are soft and quite warm (we’ve worn that helmet in single-digit temperatures without needing to add a balaclava).
On the other end of the spectrum, helmets designed for the backcountry often omit this feature entirely for the sake of lightness, packability, and ventilation, including Salomon’s MTN Lab and Smith’s Summit (most backcountry skiers will instead wear a thin beanie or cap if they need ear protection). Finally, many ski helmets feature removable ear pads, which allow you to remove them on warm-weather days or if you simply like the pad-free look.
All ski helmets offer some form of adjustability to dial in a secure fit, and the quality of the system typically correlates with price. At the budget end are helmets like the Giro Ledge or Smith Holt, which utilize an elastic strip that stretches to match your head size. Unsurprisingly, these designs don’t have a wide fit range and are less secure in general.
Most helmets above $100 include a twist dial that offers micro adjustability to tighten or loosen the fit. Cheaper dials can be hard to use with gloves on and will cinch the fit only around the back half of your head, while premium models will wrap 270 degrees or even a full 360. Boa fit dials are the crème de la crème, with easy-turning dials and an unobtrusive wire-based system that limits pressure points and cinches evenly around the head.
You’ll see the acronym “MIPS” attached to the name of many helmets featured in this article. Short for Multi-directional Impact Protection System, the safety feature is designed to move separately from the rest of the helmet in an angled impact to reduce rotational forces and brain injury. The most common MIPS design features a plastic layer that’s mounted inside the helmet—you’ll be able to see it underneath the helmet’s padding. We’ve found MIPS-lined helmets to fit slightly smaller than non-MIPS versions—not a big surprise since there’s another layer—but otherwise it’s unlikely you’ll notice it at all.
MIPS isn’t the only game in town; other multi-directional impact systems include Atomic’s AMID and Anon’s Wavecel. While the designs vary—the AMID system utilizes pads attached to the foam interior, while WaveCel leverages a network of cells—the overarching goal is to reduce rotational forces on the brain and the risk of suffering a concussion in an impact.
It’s important to note that there isn’t a standardized test that proves whether or not this technology makes your helmet safer, although some research suggests a slip-plane style system—MIPS is the original—has the potential to reduce rotational forces and the risk of a concussion.
The expanded polystyrene (EPS) foam found in most helmets is designed to crumple on impact and reduce the energy transferred to your head. Taking this a step further are technologies like Koroyd (found in Smith helmets), Holo Core (designed by Atomic), and D30 (found in certain Scott models). They all claim to offer improved energy absorption compared with standard foam and are incorporated directly into the helmet’s construction. Cost goes up, as the materials are more expensive than EPS foam (which is quite cheap), and the construction is more complex, but the good news is that models with the aforementioned energy-absorbing tech fit and feel largely the same as a standard EPS foam ski helmet.
As with MIPS liners or WaveCel, we can’t point to a standardized test showing that these premium helmets are safer than others. But growth in this part of the market shows there’s significant R&D, hopefully indicating helmets are getting progressively safer.
Buckles that secure the chinstrap on the helmet fall into two types: a pinch-style buckle (commonly referred to as a side-release buckle) and a magnetic system (Fidlock is the most popular in the helmet space, although there are others, such as Sweet Protection’s proprietary design). Both buckle styles are effective, and we’ve never had either type release accidentally in use or from a crash. Both are user-friendly, although magnetic buckles allow you to secure and release with one hand. In the end, we’d consider this a small factor in a helmet buying decision, although some will like the upgraded feel and slight bump in convenience of the magnetic tech.
Attached to the back of most ski helmets is either a plastic clip or stretchy strap that allows you to slide and secure your ski goggle’s strap in place. While strap retainers vary in their look and build quality—cheap plastic models on helmets like the Giro Ratio don’t exactly scream refinement—we’ve found all systems do their job. In fact, no one on our team can recall a time when their goggle straps managed to slip free.
To start, we can’t emphasize enough the value of getting a great fit with your ski helmet. This is a safety item, so you want it to sit securely on your head and perform to its full potential in a crash. Additionally, you want it to be as comfortable as possible, so you’re not ever inclined to leave it in the car or at home.
The simplest way to ensure a good fit is to try a bunch of helmets on in person, but if this isn’t an option, it’s best to start by measuring your head circumference. Using a flexible measuring tape (or a string and ruler), wrap the tape above your ears and eyebrows, across your forehead, and around the back—matching where the helmet will sit. Nearly all manufacturers list head circumference ranges for their products, so it’s easy to figure out the correct size. If you’re on the fence between sizing, we typically advise sizing down: the foam will pack out over time, and it’s better to be a little snug rather than too loose, compromising your safety.
The challenging part of the equation is head shape. In our product descriptions above, we mention shape consistently, as it plays a big role in comfort. As an example, someone with a round-shaped head in an oval-shaped helmet will feel pressure points along the sides, making the helmet potentially unwearable. We’ve found that brands will fall into general fit categories—round (Scott), oval (Atomic, Oakley, and Sweet Protection), and somewhere in between (Smith and Giro)—although there can be noticeable fit differences between models. In addition, some brands like Smith and Oakley offer multiple shell shapes (standard and round) for their most popular helmets.
All of the ski helmets that make our list meet either the US standard for snow helmet certification (ASTM F2040) or the European equivalent (CE EN1077) and many possess both since they are sold throughout the world. The two standards are intended for non-motorized snowsport use and include tests to prove that the helmet will stay secure in a crash (as in, it has a retention system) and has some shock-absorbing properties. Neither system assigns a rating to show whether a certain helmet is safer than another, but the standardized systems offer some piece of mind.
Researchers at Virginia Tech have taken the lead in creating a standardized test and rating system for helmets across activities, from cycling to football. Their overarching goal is to provide a STAR (Summation of Tests for the Analysis of Risk) rating, with a higher score correlating with a better chance of reducing concussion risk. Unfortunately, only 35 snowsport helmets have been tested thus far—contrast this with 241 cycling helmets that have been rated—but we’re hopeful that continued testing will shed more light on which ski helmets perform well (and which ones don’t) on their tests.
Ski helmet prices vary from well under $100 to over $300, and you start to see significant changes to construction, features, and comfort once above about $150. One of the most noticeable differences is in weight and bulk: Helmets above that $150 threshold are generally lighter and have a lower-profile shape than budget models. In addition, you’ll see higher-quality padding along the interior, which translates to better comfort for all-day wear. You also get more fit customization with twist-dial systems that wrap the helmet securely around your head. And a final significant difference is ventilation: Whereas cheap helmets have fixed openings, mid-range and high-end helmets typically include adjustable vents that allow you to shut out the cold or open them up to cool you down.
This is an important question that’s directly tied to your skiing style and purchasing priorities. There are three general construction types: In-mold, hardshell (ABS), and hybrid in-mold.
In-mold construction is the lightest and has the most low-profile shape (it’s the same type of construction found on most bike helmets). The main downside to in-mold is that the thin shell doesn’t protect as well against cosmetic damage like dents and scuffs (it’s a bad match for folks hard on their gear or if you spend time in the park).
Hardshells, commonly referred to as ABS helmets due to their ABS plastic outer layer, are two-piece designs that are super durable and tough. Their primary downsides are weight and bulk, but they’re a common choice for park riders or beginners looking to save (most ABS helmets are $120 and under).
Hybrid helmets combine the two, with a low-profile in-mold lower and a hard, ABS plastic upper. The advanced design comes with a high price tag to match, and you’ll commonly find this construction on premium offerings like the Smith Vantage, Oakley Mod 5 MIPS, and POC Obex MIPS (see our Obex MIPS review).
There’s real value in minimizing the opening between your helmet and goggles, as cold air coming through that space can give you a brain freeze (not to mention, the dreaded “gaper gap”). But the reality is that without trying on your helmet and goggles before purchasing, it’s hard to guarantee that the two will fit seamlessly. The safest bet is to purchase both items from the same brand—they’re designed in-house to pair together (for example, the Smith Level MIPS helmet with the Smith Squad Mag goggles is a proven combo). As long as you purchase the correct size helmet and goggles for your face, it’s almost certainly going to work and look good.
That said, if you already own a set of ski goggles, we wouldn’t immediately limit our helmet search to just that brand. We’ve had many instances where helmets pair great with different-brand goggles—Smith’s Nexus and Level helmets with Giro's Contour RS (pictured below), Oakley’s Mod 5 helmet with Anon’s M5, and so on. Beyond making sure you get the correct size, it’s also worth it to inspect the shape of the goggle’s frame and do your best to match it with the brim on the helmet(s) you’re considering. Then purchase from a retailer with a good return policy, check the pairing right away—before a day on the mountain—and you’ll have your answer.
To answer this question, our sustainability team thoroughly researched the category and came up with four criteria at both the product and brand levels. Of note, the four criteria are significantly less than other product categories like ski jackets and ski pants, which have nine sustainability criteria, reflecting a lot of room for growth in the ski helmet space. The current leader is the Smith Rodeo MIPS (see our Rodeo MIPS review), which meets all four of our criteria—including being the only helmet on our list to use recycled materials—and earns a sustainability rating of 4.5 out of 5. To see the full list of options, you can use our “Sort By: Sustainability” toggle above, which will reorder the products based on their sustainability ratings.
Replacement should be looked at in two ways: 1) potential damage to the helmet’s structure from an impact and 2) wear and tear over time. For the first point, the foam in a helmet is designed to deform and compress on impact, which then compromises its ability to protect you again in a future crash. Put simply, if your helmet has taken a good knock—including anything from a high-speed crash to dropping it on a concrete floor—it’s wise to replace it.
As for lifespan, there’s a general consensus among manufacturers that helmets should be replaced after three to five years of use (that range is partially dependent on how often you ski). Ski helmets are made largely of foam and plastic and deal with a lot—frigid temperatures, UV rays, snow, rain, and sweat—and this takes a toll on the materials. While it may be difficult to replace a seemingly good-looking helmet, this is a space where we err on the side of caution and follow the manufacturer’s recommendations.
Gear Guide
Best Ski Pants of 2025
Gear Guide
Best Ski Goggles of 2025
Education
PFAS in Outdoor Gear, Explained
Education
How to Layer for Skiing
