Best Trekking Poles of 2025
ByMultiple Authors
Updated:
Aug 01, 2025Table of contents
Black Diamond Pursuit ($170)
REI Co-op Trailmade ($80)
Black Diamond Distance Carbon Z ($200)
MSR DynaLock Ascent Carbon ($190)
REI Co-op Traverse ($119)
Black Diamond Alpine Carbon Cork ($230)
A standout all-rounder, the durable and comfortable Pursuit is ideal for hikers and backpackers who aren’t counting every ounce. The feature set is innovative and thoughtful, too, including an integrated lever-tightening tool and replaceable tips.
A standout all-rounder, the durable and comfortable Pursuit is ideal for hikers and backpackers who aren’t counting every ounce. The feature set is innovative and thoughtful, too, including an integrated lever-tightening tool and replaceable tips.
Comfort
Durability
Weight
Packed Size
Features
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 0.4 oz.
Type
Telescoping
Shaft Material
Aluminum
Collapsed Length
22.8 in.
Pros
Cons
Black Diamond’s Pursuit poles are the brand’s core hiking design, featuring a sturdy aluminum build and an adjustable design that nicely balances weight, convenience, and toughness. Our tester’s favorite features were the particularly comfortable cork handles and one of the chief innovations of this pole: an integrated hex tool that makes maintaining the locking mechanism a breeze if and when it comes loose on the trail. Plus, the Pursuit is as durable as it gets: The aluminum shaft can bend to avoid snapping, and after around 2,000 miles of use, our pole’s carbide tips still haven’t worn out. When they do, they’re easy to refresh with BD’s screw-in replacement tips. The poles also come with powder baskets that are easy to attach when the going gets snowy.
Our tester’s biggest beef with the Black Diamond Pursuit was that the measurement markings on his poles quickly wore out. Because of this, setting up a trekking pole shelter at a consistent height while thru-hiking the Continental Divide Trail thus became a frustrating endeavor. The Flicklock+ levers were also prone to snagging on clothes or tree limbs and unlocking, though this wasn’t a common occurrence. And finally—although it doesn’t feel heavy in hand—it’s worth noting that the Pursuit is no ultralight pole. You can nearly cut the weight in half by going with BD’s Distance Carbon Z, which also chops almost 9 inches off the collapsed length. But for a do-all pole with an added longevity boost (thanks to the integrated hex tool and replaceable tips), it doesn’t get much better for most backpackers. For more, read our review of the BD Pursuit.
REI’s budget trekking pole. The Trailmade is reasonably lightweight for an entry-level model and has a large range of adjustability. However, the build isn’t as strong as other aluminum options and the plastic lever locks are prone to loosening.
REI’s budget trekking pole. The Trailmade is reasonably lightweight for an entry-level model and has a large range of adjustability. However, the build isn’t as strong as other aluminum options and the plastic lever locks are prone to loosening.
Comfort
Durability
Weight
Packed Size
Features
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 1 oz.
Type
Telescoping
Shaft Material
Aluminum
Collapsed Length
25 in.
Pros
Cons
REI Co-op’s value-oriented Trailmade is a solid option for hikers on a budget—the aluminum pole nicely balances weight and durability while not breaking the bank. One of its biggest selling points is weight: At 1 pound 1 ounce, the Trailmade is only about half an ounce heavier than a premium option like Black Diamond’s Pursuit, which will cost you an extra $90. And while the Trailmade doesn’t come with powder baskets, our tester found the included disc to be larger than average and more than enough for short stints on snow. Finally, the pole adjusts from 41 to 55 inches, making it easy to pass down to other users and fine-tune the fit for just about any hiker.
There were elements of the REI Trailmade that felt noticeably cheap, though. Foam grips and plastic components are to be expected in a pole of this price, and the straps are basic and not particularly soft (our tester fixed them looser than normal to avoid chafing). He also had to retighten the plastic lever locks after every few hikes. Those with particularly larger or small hands might be left wanting as well, since the pole only comes with one grip diameter option. Ultimately, the Trailmade makes a lot of sense for those who only get out a few times a year, but we’d trust beefier and more featured options for challenging terrain, four-season outings, and longer trips. For more, read our REI Co-op Trailmade review.
If three ounces is worth $50 to you, the Distance Carbon Z is the pole to get. Our testers swear by this ultralight offering for moving fast in the mountains with minimal weight—despite its high price, middling durability, and lack of adjustability.
If three ounces is worth $50 to you, the Distance Carbon Z is the pole to get. Our testers swear by this ultralight offering for moving fast in the mountains with minimal weight—despite its high price, middling durability, and lack of adjustability.
Comfort
Durability
Weight
Packed Size
Features
Sustainability
Weight
9.9 oz.
Type
Folding
Shaft Material
Carbon
Collapsed Length
15.7 in.
Pros
Cons
We’re devotees of the Distance Carbon Z for mountain running. At only 9.9 ounces for the 120-centimeter (47.2 in.) model, this carbon fiber, fixed-length member of BD’s Distance series is one of the lightest poles on the market. It can stay attached to your hands all day with little fatigue, and you’ll barely notice the poles when you toss them in your pack (they fold down to just 15.7 in. in length). The newest generation of the Distance Carbon Z also comes with two different types of tips: a rubber one for rock and pavement and a carbide one for everything else. Tips are often the first part of a pole to wear out (unless you snap the shaft), so replacing them greatly extends the lifespan of your pole (you can purchase a new set separately for $15).
The Black Diamond Distance Carbon Z does have its fair share of tradeoffs though. Most glaringly, it’s one of the most expensive poles here, which is wild given that it trails far behind the competition in terms of durability and features. The fixed length means it doesn’t offer the precise adjustment necessary to set up a trekking-pole shelter, you don’t get anything in the way of powder baskets or comfy grips, and it’s no secret that carbon isn’t as foolproof as aluminum. One of our Better Trail testers has broken two of her Distance Carbon Z poles: One by sitting on it, and one while running through heavy, concrete-like snow. But if you don’t mind these tradeoffs, there’s simply no better ultralight pole for mountain running and speed-focused pursuits. For more, read our review of the Black Diamond Carbon Z.
Mixing Kevlar-reinforced carbon in a folding design, MSR’s premium poles excel at just about everything, from mountaineering to fastpacking and running. However, if you don’t need the extra strength or snow baskets, there are more affordable and lightweight options.
Mixing Kevlar-reinforced carbon in a folding design, MSR’s premium poles excel at just about everything, from mountaineering to fastpacking and running. However, if you don’t need the extra strength or snow baskets, there are more affordable and lightweight options.
Comfort
Durability
Weight
Packed Size
Features
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb.
Type
Folding/telescoping
Shaft Material
Carbon
Collapsed Length
14.3 in.
Pros
Cons
Among Seattle-based MSR’s three pole offerings, the DynaLock Ascent Carbon is its top-of-the-line model. The key to this pole is its Kevlar-reinforced carbon design, which makes it significantly more durable than most carbon poles and capable of four-season travel (MSR includes both trekking and snow baskets). And to keep weight and packed size low, it features a combination folding/telescoping design, similar to what we see in the Black Diamond FLZ poles. This mix of packability and toughness makes the DynaLock Ascent Carbon a fantastic option for mountain explorers of all stripes, and we’ve reached for this pole for everything from ultra-distance mountain runs to extended backpacking trips.
At 1 pound even for the small size (100 to 120 cm), the MSR DynaLock Ascent Carbon falls right around the middle of the road weight-wise. If you don’t plan on using your pole in the snow or prioritize a feathery swing weight, we recommend looking elsewhere; non-Kevlar-reinforced carbon designs will be perfectly serviceable for most three-season activities, and they can save you a lot of ounces (the Distance Carbon FLZ is 12 oz.). But we do love the MSR’s rock-solid feel, its extended grip for sidehilling and steep terrain, and the tool-free adjustments on the metal lever locks. For serious mountain fun (that’s not a contradiction), you’d be hard-pressed to find a better lightweight option. For more, see our review of the MSR Dynalock Ascent Carbon.
A durable, do-all option that won’t break the bank, REI Co-op’s aluminum Traverse is suitable for everything from casual day hiking to lengthy backpacks. Tool-free adjustments and included baskets are two main highlights. However, the relatively heavy construction will take it off the list for ounce-counters.
A durable, do-all option that won’t break the bank, REI Co-op’s aluminum Traverse is suitable for everything from casual day hiking to lengthy backpacks. Tool-free adjustments and included baskets are two main highlights. However, the relatively heavy construction will take it off the list for ounce-counters.
Comfort
Durability
Weight
Packed Size
Features
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 2.5 oz.
Type
Telescoping
Shaft Material
Aluminum
Collapsed Length
22 in.
Pros
Cons
It’s a tall order to balance comfort, price, versatility, and durability in a trekking pole—and that’s exactly where the REI Co-op Traverse hits its mark. One of the Traverse’s main calling cards is its beefy construction: REI used thick-diameter 7075 aluminum, which our tester described as “burly” and “heavy duty.” Along with being a workhorse, the Traverse has its fair share of convenient features: You get aluminum locking levers with tool-free adjustments, cork handles that mold to the shape of your hands over time, and included powder baskets that make it versatile for four-season use. For $119, it’s a steal compared to the competition.
At 1 pound 3.5 ounces for the 105 to 140-centimeter option, the REI Traverse is by no means ultralight. In fact, the pole is 1.5 to 2.5 ounces heavier than REI’s Trailmade (depending on which size you choose), which runs about $40 cheaper. But the boost in durability and features will be worth it for many, and it makes an excellent pole for setting up a trekking pole shelter if you don’t mind schlepping around the extra weight. We do wish REI offered replacement tips, although users report that Komperdell’s Vario Tungsten tips work well enough once you’ve managed to pry the stock tips off the shaft. All told, the Traverse is a high-value pole for day hikers and backpackers who prioritize dependability and comfort over strict ounce counting. For more, read our review of the REI Traverse.
This sturdy, four-season pole is built for comfort and durability during demanding trips in variable terrain. However, the carbon build will cost you, despite not saving much in terms of weight. The Alpine Carbon Cork is undeniably premium, but we’d look elsewhere for better value.
This sturdy, four-season pole is built for comfort and durability during demanding trips in variable terrain. However, the carbon build will cost you, despite not saving much in terms of weight. The Alpine Carbon Cork is undeniably premium, but we’d look elsewhere for better value.
Comfort
Durability
Weight
Packed Size
Features
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 1.1 oz.
Type
Telescoping
Shaft Material
Carbon
Collapsed Length
24 in.
Pros
Cons
Black Diamond’s top-of-the-line carbon telescoping pole offers everything you need for years of four-season use and abuse. The Alpine Carbon Cork features a beefy build for a carbon pole, meant to stand up to heavy packs, deep snow, and thousands of miles on the trail. Its strength comes at the cost of weight—at 1 pound 1.1 ounces, the Alpine is far from an ultralight carbon offering. That said, for our tester, the pole felt much sturdier and confidence-inspiring than the lighter and cheaper BD Distance Carbon Z and proved more practical for long missions hauling lots of weight.
The Alpine Carbon Cork also features comfortable, moisture-wicking cork grips that mold to your hand over time and sturdy metal Flicklock Pro locking levers. You can adjust and tighten the levers with the small Allen wrench that’s included with the pole—just keep track of where you place it since it’s easy to lose. There are loads of bonus features here, too: choke-up grips for use on steep terrain, powder baskets, and screw-in, interchangeable carbide tips. The screw-in tips make the replacement process far and away easier than what you have with traditional tips, which can necessitate boiling water and lots of tugging.
Our biggest hangups with this pole are weight and price. Two hundred dollars is a lot to spend on a pair of trekking poles that weigh more than a pound. You can certainly go lighter for less money, or find a similar weight for notably less (the 1-lb. 0.4-pound Pursuit is $170). That said, if you’re die-hard on carbon and want a burly and comfortable pole that can get the job done year-round, this might be the one for you. For more, read the Alpine Carbon Cork review.
A masterclass in engineering, the Durston Iceline offers impressive durability and adjustability at a competitively low weight. However, it lacks extended grips and doesn’t pack down as compactly—or deploy as quickly—as folding models.
A masterclass in engineering, the Durston Iceline offers impressive durability and adjustability at a competitively low weight. However, it lacks extended grips and doesn’t pack down as compactly—or deploy as quickly—as folding models.
Comfort
Durability
Weight
Packed Size
Features
Sustainability
Weight
10.2 oz.
Type
Telescoping/quick connect
Shaft Material
Carbon
Collapsed Length
19.5 in.
Pros
Cons
Dan Durston is one of our favorite gear designers for a reason—his outside-the-box thinking consistently yields smart, functional, and innovative gear. With the Iceline, he tackled one of the biggest challenges in ultralight trekking poles: making a carbon fiber design that’s actually durable. The result is impressive. With their thoughtful two-piece design, the Icelines eliminate a common failure point while enabling a thicker, stronger lower shaft. Compared to similarly featherweight models like the Black Diamond Distance Carbon Z, the Icelines feel noticeably sturdier, featuring 16-millimeter carbon near the tip versus the Z’s narrower 12-millimeter tubing.
Another standout feature of the Iceline is its adjustability. Most trekking poles in the sub-10-ounce range are fixed-length and incompatible with trekking pole shelters. The Iceline breaks that mold with over 30 centimeters of adjustment, locked in by a sturdy aluminum lever lock. This makes it one of the only truly ultralight poles that can comfortably handle both hiking and shelter duty.
That said, there are some compromises. The Iceline’s 19.5-inch packed size is serviceable for backpackers, but it’s too long for most trail running vests and pole quivers, which limits its appeal for runners. And unlike folding designs, the Iceline comes apart into two separate pieces—fine for backpackers who leave their poles out all day, but less ideal for on-the-fly deployment. There’s also no extended grip—a drawback for off-trail travel or steep terrain where choke-up sections are useful. But for ultralight hikers and backpackers who prioritize strength, simplicity, and shelter compatibility, the Iceline stands out as one of the most capable carbon trekking poles available. For more, read our review of the Durston Iceline.
With a folding, fixed-length design, the Distance Z aims for a low weight and collapsed size at a reasonable price. You can go lighter with a carbon version, but we’d advise all but the most weight-conscious hikers to stick with this aluminum design. Just make sure you don’t need adjustability (if so, get the Distance FLZ).
With a folding, fixed-length design, the Distance Z aims for a low weight and collapsed size at a reasonable price. You can go lighter with a carbon version, but we’d advise all but the most weight-conscious hikers to stick with this aluminum design. Just make sure you don’t need adjustability (if so, get the Distance FLZ).
Comfort
Durability
Weight
Packed Size
Features
Sustainability
Weight
12.9 oz.
Type
Folding
Shaft Material
Aluminum
Collapsed Length
15.7 in.
Pros
Cons
Black Diamond runs the show when it comes to folding trekking poles. Its Distance Z is a case in point. At 12.9 ounces for the 120-centimeter model, the Distance Z is lightyears lighter than comparable aluminum telescoping poles—and even some carbon models. And its aluminum build means it can withstand abuse, too. Instead of separate pieces that slide into one another (as is the case with most telescoping designs), the Distance Z features three separate sections that snap into place with the help of a simple button lock near the handle. Given this folding design, the pole collapses down to a mere 15.7 inches. This is minuscule compared to most telescoping poles; Black Diamond’s Pursuit, for example, measures 24.4 inches in length when collapsed.
The biggest downside of the Distance Z is that the pole doesn’t lengthen or shorten; the length you buy is the length you get. This is especially problematic for hikers utilizing trekking pole shelters since it’s important to dial in a precise height for structural stability. Even if you’re just using the poles for hiking, we highly recommend trying them out at your local outdoor gear store to make sure you get the right fit. Or, you can spend $20 more and go with Black Diamond’s Distance FLZ, which tacks on almost 6 inches of adjustability. Just keep in mind that the Distance series is much more stripped down than, for example, Black Diamond's Pursuit poles: the pole’s wrist straps are relatively barebones, the grip extension is barely there, and the Distance Z lacks a built-in hex tool and powder baskets. For more, read our Distance Z review.
The budget-oriented Spirit Lite offers a sturdy, no-frills build with a wide range of adjustment. The partial-cork grips and well-built locks feel like a step up from the budget market. However, it fills an odd middle ground and we think most hikers will want to go with a true budget pole or step up to a more premium mid-range design.
The budget-oriented Spirit Lite offers a sturdy, no-frills build with a wide range of adjustment. The partial-cork grips and well-built locks feel like a step up from the budget market. However, it fills an odd middle ground and we think most hikers will want to go with a true budget pole or step up to a more premium mid-range design.
Comfort
Durability
Weight
Packed Size
Features
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 3.2 oz.
Type
Telescoping
Shaft Material
Aluminum
Collapsed Length
25.2 in.
Pros
Cons
Whether for skiing or hiking, Germany-based Leki has been making trekking poles for well over 50 years. Its Spirit Lite shows the brand still knows its stuff, especially when it comes to budget-oriented poles. The Spirit has all the fixings of a pole built for the vast majority of adventurers: a burly aluminum build, telescoping design with over a foot of adjustability, a simple but comfortable wrist strap, and a trustworthy lever lock system that can be hand-tightened while on the trail.
It’s rare to see cork grips on a $100 trekking pole, and Leki gets it done by using a combination of foam and cork (80%), which feels premium next to the skin, molds to the hands, and should last for many seasons of use and abuse. However, the hybrid design doesn’t wick moisture quite as well as a full cork option, nor does it provide as much cushion and shock absorption as either a foam handle—which is much more common at this price point—or a full cork design. It’s a small difference, but it is noticeable.
Despite the thoughtful grip design, we don’t think the Spirit Lite is a runaway favorite among budget poles. We wish the pole had choke-up grips for steep and uneven terrain, and it lacks some worthwhile extras like snow baskets. You can also go a good bit cheaper for a pole with some relatively trivial downgrades. For example, REI’s Trailmade will save you $30, and a bargain barrel option from Cascade Mountain Tech will save you $40+. Finally, after using the Spirit Lite back-to-back with Leki’s more premium offerings like the Makalu Cork Lite, it was readily apparent that spending up will get you a pole that’s built for more force and will last you longer on the trail. For more, read our review of the Leki Spirit Lite.
Ounce counters and runners, look out! REI Co-op’s Swiftland TT is a solid offering that feels like a feather and still holds up great on the trail. But while it has a lot to offer, it can’t compete with the performance or price of poles in Black Diamond’s Distance series.
Ounce counters and runners, look out! REI Co-op’s Swiftland TT is a solid offering that feels like a feather and still holds up great on the trail. But while it has a lot to offer, it can’t compete with the performance or price of poles in Black Diamond’s Distance series.
Comfort
Durability
Weight
Packed Size
Features
Sustainability
Weight
11.2 oz.
Type
Folding
Shaft Material
Carbon
Collapsed Length
14.5 in.
Pros
Cons
There’s a lot to like about mountain running-specific poles: they’re virtually unnoticeable in hand and collapse down small enough to easily slide into a pack. The Swiftland TT is REI Co-op’s attempt to break into this increasingly popular market. It’s an extremely light offering—11.2 ounces—that, like other poles prized by ultrarunners, folds into three small pieces and slides easily into a pack or a dedicated pole quiver. And with a packed size of 14.5 inches, they beat out even the Black Diamond Distance Z poles (15.7 in.). In short, the Swiftland TT offer everything you need for a fixed-length pole to go deep into the backcountry; and despite their skinny carbon build, our tester was pleasantly surprised by their strength.
Our chief complaint here is price. The Swiftland TT run cheaper than a comparable carbon offering from Black Diamond, but the closer comparison weight-wise is BD’s aluminum Distance Z, which weigh just an ounce more and cost $20 less (and are notably more durable than the Swiftland’s carbon build). And as with all fixed-length poles, you won’t want to use these to pitch a trekking pole shelter. Still, for runners or speed-minded hikers looking for an alternative to Black Diamond’s Distance Z series, the Swiftland TT are worth a look. For more, see our review of the REI Swiftland TT.
With a build that’ll last you years (or a lifetime), the Makalu (women's Cressida) is a great all-around trekking pole that will meet the needs of most backpackers and hikers. However, its features lack a premium finish, and the uber-long packed size puts it out of contention for day hikers or runners who routinely store their poles on their pack.
With a build that’ll last you years (or a lifetime), the Makalu (women's Cressida) is a great all-around trekking pole that will meet the needs of most backpackers and hikers. However, its features lack a premium finish, and the uber-long packed size puts it out of contention for day hikers or runners who routinely store their poles on their pack.
Comfort
Durability
Weight
Packed Size
Features
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 1.9 oz.
Type
Telescoping
Shaft Material
Aluminum
Collapsed Length
26.4 in.
Pros
Cons
The Makalu Cork Lite from trekking pole mainstay Leki is a no-nonsense offering for the backpacker or hiker who needs a pole that will weather the elements and last for years. Throughout our testing, the aluminum construction proved durable enough to handle the strange forces associated with deep snow and boulder hopping; we don’t expect our poles to ever break, but if they do, Leki offers a lifetime warranty and will replace them free of charge. The Makalu’s telescoping design offers a wide range of adjustability from 100 to 135 centimeters (shorter folks can drop down to the 90-to-125-cm women’s Cressida), and hand-turnable screws at the lever locks make maintenance quick and easy. Our tester found the choke-up grip particularly useful while traversing snow high up in the Cascades, and the cork grips offer a premium feel.
Our tester’s overall impression of the Makalu poles was simple and to the point: “No complaints.” But there are a few asterisks to mention here. The Makalu’s sharp lever locks are far less of a joy to toggle than the BD Pursuit’s rubber-coated levers, and we think other poles have better (read: smoother) tightening systems. Further, with a packed length of 26.4 inches, the Makalu is one of the bulkiest poles here, which puts it out of the running for fast-moving hikers or runners. We’re admittedly being picky; the Makalu is a durable, versatile trekking pole that will last longer than most, but it lacks the premium finishes of similarly priced alternatives. For more, see our review of the Leki Cressida Cork Lite.
The Ultratrail FX.One is a fast-and-light hiker’s dream, featuring Leki’s glove-like Trail Shark grip system that offers next-level control and power transfer between body and pole. However, it’s heavier than the BD Distance Carbon Z and $20 more.
The Ultratrail FX.One is a fast-and-light hiker’s dream, featuring Leki’s glove-like Trail Shark grip system that offers next-level control and power transfer between body and pole. However, it’s heavier than the BD Distance Carbon Z and $20 more.
Comfort
Durability
Weight
Packed Size
Features
Sustainability
Weight
12.8 oz.
Type
Folding
Shaft Material
Carbon
Collapsed Length
14.2 in.
Pros
Cons
Leki is one of the original trekking pole innovators and its Ultratrail FX.One demonstrates just how well it knows what users need to move fast and light in the mountains. The all-carbon Ultratrail FX.One features a tri-fold design that’s become synonymous with mountain running. By cutting out all extra material, it maximizes weight savings and durability—but loses out on adjustability. To balance that out, the pole comes in seven lengths, from 105 to 135 centimeters.
One of Leki’s chief innovations is its “Trail Shark” attachment system. Instead of traditional wrist loops, the shark system works like a glove: You don the wrap-around hand strap and simply click it into the unique attachment point on the pole’s grip. When you need to stow your poles, removing them is as simple as unclicking, folding them up, and stuffing them away. The glove system functions to distribute your weight more directly and naturally into the pole, maximizing your efficiency when working hard. However, it can become a bear if you don’t want to wear the gloves all day, or if you find yourself constantly needing to swap your poles from hand to hand (as might be the case in fourth-class terrain).
You can go even lighter with the Ultratrail FX.One Superlite, but you better have a good reason for it. Unless you’re a competitive distance racer, the extra $30 saves you a bit of weight but comes at the cost of the pole’s longevity. Our tester was impressed by the durability of the standard Ultratrail FX.One on a gnarly expedition up Mount Waddington in British Columbia. After bushwacking up steep and uneven terrain and taking falls with a heavy pack and with the pole’s tips stuck in rock and snow, they remained sturdy and stable as ever. However, after just a couple of weeks of heavy use, our testers did notice that the cork composite grips began to split and peel away from the pole’s body. Still, the Leki’s are a stellar option for committed runners who want a dedicated pole for their fast-and-light mountain adventures. For more, read our Ultratrail FX.One review.
For budget-minded shoppers in search of a lightweight carbon pole (with a cork grip!), the Zpacks is a compelling option. However, it’s not competitive with most carbon poles (and even some aluminum models) in terms of weight, and we’re not impressed with the quality of its components.
For budget-minded shoppers in search of a lightweight carbon pole (with a cork grip!), the Zpacks is a compelling option. However, it’s not competitive with most carbon poles (and even some aluminum models) in terms of weight, and we’re not impressed with the quality of its components.
Comfort
Durability
Weight
Packed Size
Features
Sustainability
Weight
15.3 oz.
Type
Telescoping
Shaft Material
Carbon
Collapsed Length
24.5 in.
Pros
Cons
Zpacks knows its way around ultralight gear, and the Carbon Fiber trekking pole is its offering for long-distance backpacking and pitching trekking pole shelters. We tested the Zpacks on a summer’s worth of outings in the Wyoming and Colorado high country (including the Wind River High Route), and found it to be serviceable for on-trail hiking but underbuilt for cross-country travel (in fact, one of our hiking partners snapped her Zpacks pole during a trip together). Especially given its ultralight intentions, the Carbon Fiber’s weight and packed size did not blow us away, either: At almost a pound and 2 feet long, it’s a lot more pole than carbon competitors like the 9.9-ounce, 15.7-inch Black Diamond Distance Carbon Z.
Where the Zpacks makes up for some of its shortcomings is in price. At just $100, it falls into the same price range as the full-on budget competition, which includes bulky, 1-pound 3.2-ounce numbers like the Leki Spirit Lite. The Zpacks also comes with the option of a cork grip for no price difference, which molds to the hand and offers a more comfortable experience than foam. Finally, it’s available as a single pole ($60), which could be a great way to save if you’re a fan of hiking with a single pole (we are!). If finding a lightweight, adjustable pole at a low price is your aim, the Zpacks is a compelling choice, but we think there are much better carbon options on the market, including Black Diamond’s Distance Carbon series and the Durston Iceline. For more, see our review of the Zpacks Carbon Fiber.
Black Diamond’s budget-minded pole that gets the job done for recreational hikers. It lacks the premium feel of pricier designs, is heavy and bulky, and doesn’t come with fun features like interchangeable tips or integrated tools. But it’s adjustable and affordable, and the aluminum shaft should stand the test of time.
Black Diamond’s budget-minded pole that gets the job done for recreational hikers. It lacks the premium feel of pricier designs, is heavy and bulky, and doesn’t come with fun features like interchangeable tips or integrated tools. But it’s adjustable and affordable, and the aluminum shaft should stand the test of time.
Comfort
Durability
Weight
Packed Size
Features
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 2.8 oz.
Type
Telescoping
Shaft Material
Aluminum
Collapsed Length
24.2 in.
Pros
Cons
Black Diamond’s aluminum Trail Back poles present a stellar option for the casual hiker who’d like some extra support on the trail. Not everybody needs a top-of-the-line trekking pole built for thousands of miles and years of abuse; for the weekend warrior who gets out a handful of times a year, a no-frills pole is sufficient. The Trail Back gives you the barebones—plus a good bit more, including handy Flicklocks that make adjusting length on the fly a cinch, a relatively lightweight build for the price, and a collapsed length comparable to poles that cost $100 more. Plus, it holds up pretty well, too.
We’re big advocates of saving some cash when it’s practical. Trekking poles are one gear area where spending big only yields returns for dedicated users. What do you lose by opting for a budget pole? Mostly comfort and durability. Our tester wasn’t the biggest fan of the Trail Back’s EVA foam grips, which weren’t as comfortable or moisture-wicking as he would’ve liked. Plus, the simple foam doesn’t mold to your hand as nicely over time as cork. We also wouldn’t expect this pole to last quite as long as a more expensive option when subjected to frequent and intense use—the plastic lever locks in particular don’t inspire a ton of confidence—but if you’re looking for a budget pole, you probably don’t need it to. For more, read the Trail Back review.
The LT5 is one of the lightest telescoping poles on the market, and the classy aesthetic is hard to beat. However, the tradeoff is a high price tag and fragile design, and we’re not huge fans of the twist locks. We think there are more compelling options from Durston and Black Diamond.
The LT5 is one of the lightest telescoping poles on the market, and the classy aesthetic is hard to beat. However, the tradeoff is a high price tag and fragile design, and we’re not huge fans of the twist locks. We think there are more compelling options from Durston and Black Diamond.
Comfort
Durability
Weight
Packed Size
Features
Sustainability
Weight
9.8 oz.
Type
Telescoping
Shaft Material
Carbon
Collapsed Length
23.5 in.
Pros
Cons
Gossamer Gear is an innovator in saving weight in the backcountry, so it stands to reason they’ve thought long and hard about how to make a lightweight trekking pole. The LT5 is a carbon telescoping pole that weighs a mind-boggling 9.8 ounces for the pair, yet still has 27.5 inches of adjustability. This is unprecedented: REI’s Flash Carbon tries to achieve the same balance of lightweight adjustability, but checks in at almost four ounces more. And the LT5 is form as well as function: Our reviewer was impressed by the poles’ elegant, simple looks, including black shafts with white lettering and cork-colored EVA foam handles.
We have a few concerns with the LT5. First, the pole uses an old-school twist lock. While functional in theory, the locks are harder to operate than a more modern lever lock, especially when extended too far or when adjusting in the cold. Second, and most importantly, the carbon design is not durable: Despite babying his set of LT5s, our reviewer cracked a pole simply by stepping on it. Finally, in the name of weight savings, Gossamer Gear also cut nearly everything extraneous, including choke-up grips, which can be a lifesaver in steep and uneven terrain. For the average backpacker or day hiker, there are just too many sacrifices to justify the $195 price tag. But for the right fastpacker or trekking pole shelter user, these might be just the ticket. For more, read our review of the Gossamer Gear LT5.
One of the lightest telescoping poles on the market, and more affordable than much of the carbon competition. A great option for weight-conscious hikers who also want adjustability (for a trekking-pole shelter, for example). However, the packed size is long and the components lack a premium feel.
One of the lightest telescoping poles on the market, and more affordable than much of the carbon competition. A great option for weight-conscious hikers who also want adjustability (for a trekking-pole shelter, for example). However, the packed size is long and the components lack a premium feel.
Comfort
Durability
Weight
Packed Size
Features
Sustainability
Weight
13.6 oz.
Type
Telescoping
Shaft Material
Carbon
Collapsed Length
25.2 in.
Pros
Cons
Thru-hikers and ounce-counters face a tough balancing act when it comes to trekking poles: They need something adjustable and burly, but as lightweight as possible. Enter REI Co-op’s Flash Carbon. Its sturdy telescoping build combined with ultralight carbon composition strikes a compelling middle ground for those looking to cut weight. In fact, the Flash Carbons are among the lightest fully telescoping poles on the market.
To be clear, there are a slew of lighter poles: Black Diamond’s Distance series, REI’s Swiftland, and Leki’s UltraTrail FX.One to name a few. Out of this long list, the Flash Carbon stands out with its three-piece telescoping design. First and foremost, this gets you durability. Compared to folding designs, telescoping builds add a bit of stiffness,burliness, and longevity. Second, you get the luxury of maximal adjustability: the Flash Carbon can extend from 105 to 140 centimeters, making it a great option for pitching a trekking-pole shelter or swapping between hikers of varying sizes.
Still, there are inherent tradeoffs with this design. Despite the theoretical durability of the telescoping build, users report shaft snappage and a grip that quickly disintegrates (note: our tester hasn’t experienced either of these issues). We also aren’t big fans of the relatively barebones wrist strap, and the lever locks can be somewhat finicky to dial in perfectly. Finally, the pole is fairly bulky when collapsed: 25.2 inches compared to the Swiftland’s 14.5 inches. All told, the Flash Carbon is a great pole for a relatively niche group—ultralight-minded backcountry goers that still need a large range of adjustability. For your average backpacker, the compromise in durability (due to the carbon build) outweighs the pole’s weight savings. For more, read the Flash Carbon review.
A standout all-rounder, the durable and comfortable Pursuit is ideal for hikers and backpackers who aren’t counting every ounce. The feature set is innovative and thoughtful, too, including an integrated lever-tightening tool and replaceable tips.
Comfort
Durability
Weight
Packed Size
Features
Sustainability
Mixing Kevlar-reinforced carbon in a folding design, MSR’s premium poles excel at just about everything, from mountaineering to fastpacking and running. However, if you don’t need the extra strength or snow baskets, there are more affordable and lightweight options.
Comfort
Durability
Weight
Packed Size
Features
Sustainability
A masterclass in engineering, the Durston Iceline offers impressive durability and adjustability at a competitively low weight. However, it lacks extended grips and doesn’t pack down as compactly—or deploy as quickly—as folding models.
Comfort
Durability
Weight
Packed Size
Features
Sustainability
Mountainsmith Dolomite 7075 OLS ($30): Single Pole, Excellent Value
We’re big fans of hiking and backpacking with a single pole—it provides many of the same stability benefits as a pair while reducing weight and keeping one hand free. While most major manufacturers only sell trekking poles in pairs, Mountainsmith stands out by offering the budget-friendly Dolomite 7075 for just $30. Despite its low price, the Dolomite is impressively feature-rich, with a partial cork handle, a foam extension for choking up on steep climbs, two sets of baskets (hiking and snow), a rubber tip for hard surfaces, and lever locks.
Of course, there are some tradeoffs. The plastic lever locks are flimsy, the cork handle has a cheaper feel with a hard plastic cap that impacts comfort, and at 10 ounces per pole, it’s on the heavier end of the spectrum. But considering its price, the Dolomite delivers excellent value. Even purchasing a set would still undercut alternatives like the REI Trailmade ($70) while offering better comfort and features. And the cherry on top: the Dolomite’s tip is now replaceable, extending the product's lifespan.
Montem Ultra Strong ($75): Ambitious Name, Decent Performance
Montem is a value-focused outdoor brand, and its core trekking pole, the Ultra Strong, aims squarely at the entry-level market. At $75, it competes directly with designs like REI’s Trailmade and stacks up well on paper: comfortable foam grips with choke-up extensions (a feature the Trailmade lacks), lever locks, and a reasonably light aluminum build (1 lb. 3.2 oz. per pair).
In practice, though, the Ultra Strong doesn’t fully live up to its name. While descending steep trails, the poles felt less solid and confidence-inspiring than more premium options like REI’s Traverse, and the plastic flicklocks don’t offer the same durability as metal alternatives. Would we recommend the Ultra Strong for someone logging serious mileage or tackling rugged terrain? Probably not. But with comfortable grips and a decent build, they’re perfectly serviceable for casual hikes and typical on-trail use.
Our overall rating takes the product’s full picture into account: price, build quality, performance (based on intended use), durability, sustainability, and more. On the high end of the rating scale are standout trekking poles that have something special to offer, whether they’re the crème de la crème or budget designs with a savvy feature set. If you ask us, most readers should be looking to purchase a pole with an above-average overall rating—there’s simply little reason not to. That said, trekking poles with lower overall ratings are still notable enough to have made our list; for various reasons, these might be compelling to users with specific design preferences or those who get out only a few times a year.
For a product you literally hold in your hands, comfort is a clear priority for trekking poles. Our ratings take into consideration all of the features that play into hiking comfort: the quality and hand feel of the grip, the softness of the wrist strap (does it rub or chafe, or does it fade into the background?), and the shock-absorbing qualities of the pole. For big adventures where you’ll be using your poles a lot, hiking comfort can and should be a big factor. But if you only grab your poles for short stretches for support and balance, a pole with a middling comfort rating will probably suffice.
All-day comfort thanks to premium cork grips that mold to your hand over time and wick moisture or soft-touch EVA foam.
Mid-range comfort that’s suitable for day hikes. Foam grips may not wick moisture well, and the wrist straps may use cheap nylon, which can cause issues with rubbing.
Poor comfort due to cheap, rough grips or a faulty wrist strap design. Given the importance of comfort, we generally recommend against purchasing poles that score this low.
Ideally, trekking poles are a long-term purchase that you can use to rack up hundreds, even thousands of miles. Durability varies quite a bit between models and is mostly tied to shaft material: aluminum usually has a longer lifespan than carbon fiber because of its toughness and ability to bend rather than fracture in a hard impact. The diameter of the shaft also plays a role, with thicker diameters corresponding with higher levels of durability.
It’s worth noting that durability and weight (covered below) are closely tied, and folks wanting to travel fast and light are often willing to compromise some in durability for the benefit of significantly lighter trekking poles. But it’s important to think through your intended uses: If you’ll be hauling a heavy load, traveling through challenging terrain, or intend to use your poles to hold up a structure, it may be worth prioritizing toughness over weight.
Highly durable poles, often with thick-diameter aluminum shafts (although some highly durable carbon models land here, too). Great for four-season use including snow travel.
Poles that are tough enough for typical summer-time hiking and backpacking adventures.
Thin carbon fiber poles that require care to avoid breakage.
This rating is directly tied to how much a given set of trekking poles weighs. A lighter trekking pole is a real boon on the trail if you’ll be running, fastpacking, thru-hiking, or just want to minimize the effort required to carry them. That said, as covered in our Durability section above, a lower weight will increase the chances of breakage, requiring extra care. Most hikers and backpackers are best off with a pole that lands in the middle weight-wise, although there are viable reasons to opt for a heavyweight or ultralight pole.
Superlight trekking poles built for folks moving fast on the trail. Average weight for a pair is 9 to 15 ounces.
Light but not ultralight, these poles are the core of the hiking and backpacking market. The average weight is about 1 pound to 1 pound 3 ounces per pair.
Heavyweight poles that are typically budget-oriented or built for snow travel, weighing more than 1 pound 3 ounces per pair.
Our packed size rating answers the question: How compact can you make the poles? This rating takes into account the shortest length of the pole and the overall diameter of its packed size. All poles that made our guide break down in some way and can be attached to a large backpacking backpack, but their length and packed diameter vary quite a bit. Folding poles are the most compact while telescoping poles are often 8 to 10 inches longer at their minimum length. Not everyone needs to prioritize packed size, but it can be an important consideration for travel—for fitting into a duffel or suitcase—and storing in the stretchy pocket of your hiking daypack or even a running vest.
Folding-style poles that compress to a length of 19 inches and under.
Three-piece telescoping poles that compress enough to fit on the sides of most daypacks and inside most suitcases. Average length of 20 to 24 inches.
Two or three-piece telescoping poles that will be hard to fit into a suitcase or on the outside of a smaller daypack. Minimum length of 25 inches and up.
For a simple tool, trekking poles vary quite a bit in their features. Most poles offer a standard grip and wrist strap, a folding or telescoping system, a carbide tip, and a small disc at the base to protect the lower shaft from damage. This can be great for those focused on keeping weight to a minimum. But feature-rich models have value, too; adding choke-up grips makes it more comfortable and easier to hold the pole during steep ascents, snow baskets give the pole four-season functionality, and premium locking mechanisms with the ability to tighten on the trail offer peace of mind.
Feature-rich poles that are all-season-ready out of the box. These poles include choke-up grips, a quality telescoping system, two sets of baskets, and more.
Functional features but in a trimmed-down form. For example, these poles may include choke-up grips but not snow baskets.
Minimalist poles that only include the basics, prioritizing weight or cost-savings over features.
Our sustainability rating for trekking poles takes into account seven different criteria. On the product level, we’re looking for recycled materials and whether or not replacement parts are available (such as screw-on tips). On the brand level, our criteria include whether the company uses recycled or reduced packaging, monitors greenhouse gas emissions (often measured by the Higg Index), and publishes an annual impact report. We also consider the degree to which our criteria are met; for example, 10% recycled materials is not the same as 100% recycled materials. Note that not every sustainability effort by a brand or product fits neatly into our categories. In these circumstances, we may increase or decrease a rating based on these factors. You can find details on these factors in the sustainability drop-down under each product above.
These trekking poles are among the most sustainable on the market and earn our Better Trail Certified distinction. They often meet most of our sustainability criteria for this category.
These trekking poles are a good, middle-of-the-pack option for sustainability. They often meet half or more of our criteria for this category.
These trekking poles are the least sustainable and have significant room for improvement. They usually only meet about a quarter or less of our criteria.
The vast majority of trekking poles are made from aluminum or carbon. As a basic rule of thumb, aluminum is cheaper but heavier, while carbon is more expensive but substantially lighter. That said, things are a bit more complex, so we’ll dig into the nuances of each material below.
For decades, aluminum has been the material of choice for trekking poles: it’s relatively cheap, somewhat light, and quite durable. The durability of aluminum is far and away its strong suit. Unlike carbon, aluminum bends. When it comes to choosing the right pole for you, this flexibility is one of the material’s most important qualities. This can equate to a longer lifespan and, in practice, easier in-the-field repair. Imagine the following: You’re hustling down a steep talus slope, and your pole gets wedged in between two rocks as you trip. An aluminum pole might come out bent at a right angle. To fix it, you only need to bend it back in place. A carbon pole, on the other hand, might snap in two and leave you out of luck for the hike back to the car.
While aluminum is beefy and long-lived, it’s hard to beat carbon fiber when it comes to weight. A carbon pole will almost always run a good bit lighter: Black Diamond’s Distance Carbon Z, for example, runs about 3 ounces lighter than the aluminum version, the Distance Z. And carbon fiber does have impressive rigidity and strength relative to its low weight—we’ve had carbon poles that have endured years of abuse with no breakage to speak of. (On the other hand, we’ve also broken our fair share.) In the end, because they crack and shatter rather than bend, you do need to baby them more than a comparable aluminum model.
Nearly all trekking poles come with ergonomic handles built for trail comfort. While you can find some bargain barrel poles with slimy-feeling rubber handles, most grips are made from cork, EVA foam, or composite material.
Cork handles originated in the fishing industry. Cork, anglers realized, is hydrophobic, meaning it resists rain, sweat, and other moisture. Bigger picture, it’s also lighter than rubber and conforms to your grip’s unique shape over time. To us, cork has a unique aesthetic that adds to the appeal of a pole, too. Ethylene vinyl acetate, or EVA, foam originated decades ago to add more cushion and support to running shoes. Unlike cork and rubber, EVA doesn’t repel water—but it does dry fast. It holds its shape and is exceptionally light, durable, and soft and cushiony, which serves to both absorb shock and save your hands from wear. EVA tends to run lighter than cork, but many users find cork a bit more comfortable than a foam grip.
As terrain changes, it isn’t always practical to stop to adjust your poles—especially when moving fast. Enter choke-up grips. Also known as grip extensions, these are added padding on the shaft of poles that allow users to grip the pole lower down. This effectively shortens the length of poles for steep sections of trail. Not all poles include them and they’re not necessary for folks that stick to relatively flat terrain, but we almost always end up using the feature on extended trips.
Nearly all trekking poles feature wrist straps. These provide an attachment point between the hiker and the pole, usually by looping around the wrist. Wrist straps are generally adjustable—meaning you can tighten and loosen them. Sometimes, they’re even made specifically for your right or left hand and feature padding for extra comfort. When users have the fit dialed, they can push down with these straps instead of squeezing hard on the poles, which can reduce overall fatigue in the hands and arms. Leki’s hand harness—featured on its Ultratrail FX.One—offers a unique alternative here. Called a “Trail Shark” system, these go directly over your palms instead of only your wrists. In practice, this is a unique innovation that allows users to easily push hard with its poles without too much fatigue.
How and if a trekking pole collapses and adjusts is key to its use out on the trail and its storage around the house. These days, it’s helpful to think of poles in two different categories: telescoping or folding.
Telescoping
Telescoping poles function, more or less, how their name makes them sound. They’re built out of several (usually three) pieces of tubing that slide within one another. Users extend each tube, secure them in place, and voila, your pole is ready to use. The main advantage here is adjustability: Telescoping poles fit a range of body types. If you want to hand down a pole to your taller spouse or shorter child, you’ll likely be all set. Still, look at just how adjustable each pole comes out of the box. Poles like the Black Diamond Pursuit and REI Co-op Trailmade above are more or less one-size-fits-all—the Pursuit, for example, adjusts all the way from 100 to 140 centimeters (39 to 55 in.) in its M/L size. The Leki Spirit Lite and REI Co-op Traverse both offer multiple ranges that can be tailored to more specific users.
Folding
Instead of sliding fully into one another like the telescoping sticks above, folding poles usually come in sections that detach from one another. Instead of a single rod, you end up with a small bundle of (usually three) sticks. To assemble, you slide them into place, set the lock, and you’re ready to roll. Why would you want to go this route compared to the simplicity of a telescoping design? For starters, folding poles almost always pack up into a shorter package than telescoping poles (often 8 to 10 in. shorter). Second, they’re also lighter weight. And finally, you won’t find lock slippage here since nothing needs adjusting. Still, these designs have their downsides, too: In general, they’re a little bit weaker than telescoping poles. While their weight makes them an ounce-counter’s dream, their lack of adjustability also leaves most users of trekking pole shelters wanting.
Telescoping and Folding
Finally, in recent years, some companies have started offering a mixed design that’s a hybrid between the two above options. These feature the space-savings and lightness of folding designs alongside the versatility of a telescoping option. The first player to mention on this front is Black Diamond: It offers an “FLZ” option (combining “flicklock” and “Z-fold”) for its Distance and Pursuit poles. These poles are a hair heavier and more expensive than its standard counterparts (the Distance Carbon FLZ is $20 more expensive and about 2 ounces heavier than the regular Distance Carbon Z (read the Distance Carbon Z review) but offer about 15 centimeters (6 in.) of adjustability. Other brands, too, are experimenting with this middle ground. MSR offers a similar pole in its DynaLock Ascent Carbon (pictured below) and Durston has taken this model even farther and lighter with its Iceline. As a whole, these hybrid offerings are compelling, especially for ultrarunners looking to shave as many ounces as possible but still have a bit of adjustability on their poles for shelters.
Twist Locks
Twisting mechanisms are the old-school method of locking a telescoping pole in place. Relatively simple and affordable, these mechanisms work by relying on an expander and a screw. Just twist things into place, and your poles are ready to roll. While this method is tried-and-true, it does have some inherent downsides. First, they’re prone to slippage and overt failure over time. Sub-zero weather especially does them in. They can also be nearly impossible to operate with cold fingers.
Lever Locks
We think lever or flick-style locks are a worthy upgrade from the standard twist design. Their name says it all: they utilize a lever that flicks open to allow the pole to extend or collapse and shuts to lock things in place. These are sturdier, harder to wear out, and easier to operate in the cold than twist designs. That said, they also tend to run a bit more expensive. And, like twist designs above, they can be prone to slippage and failure over time (although most designs can be re-tightened in the field).
Button Locks
Button locks are often a vital part of fixed-length, folding poles’ setup. These types of poles slot into one another and generally rely on a button lock to extend a top section of the pole to lock things in place. A hard tug at the top section of the pole is required to expose the button, and presing the button then collapses the design. These are the simplest designs of the bunch and generally reliable (but like all locking types, failure can occur). The main downside here, though, is the lack of adjustability. While the designs above let users customize pole length to fit their bodies, pure button designs leave you with one fixed length. (Note, some like the Black Diamond FLZ collection combine buttons and lever locks to allow for length adjustment.)
Although lever locks are our preferred locking mechanism for telescoping poles, there’s no getting around the fact that they can loosen over time. When lever locks loosen, poles are liable to collapsing under pressure, rendering them rather useless. The good news is that most manufacturers account for this by building in ways to tighten these locks in the field.
The simplest design uses a large screw on each lever lock that is built to be hand tightened (as seen on the Leki Spirit Lite and Makalu Cork Lite). If you have fumbly thumbs like us, these hand screws can prove challenging for dialing in micro-adjustments, but they certainly get the job done. Another design allows you to tighten the lock by twisting the lever itself, which is easy to grab between the thumb and forefinger (REI Co-op’s Traverse uses this feature). Finally, Black Diamond’s Pursuit pole has a hex tool built into its shaft, which is a nice upgrade from poles that simply come with an Allen wrench that’s all too easy to misplace (like the Black Diamond Alpine Carbon Cork).
Finding the right pole for you also means dialing in your connection with the ground. Pole tips can help you feel steady and secure or leave you slipping and falling. There are a few types of tips worth mentioning.
Carbide tips are like thick, truncated nails that dig into everything from soil and ice. They bite easily into the hard-packed earth typical of most single track, but function great on ice as well, helping you maintain traction on steep, slippery terrain. However, their weaknesses become clear on particularly hard surfaces like rock. Instead of puncturing the rock, they’re prone to slipping, limiting your security and leaving nasty scars—which is far from good LNT practice.
To remedy some of these issues, consider rubber tips when consistently on hard surfaces like asphalt, pavement, and rock. Rubber tips are soft and sticky, allowing them to function like a sticky rubber hiking shoe role. That said, they don’t dig in as well into dirt and loam as carbide tips. While most poles come stock with a carbide tip, virtually all are compatible with rubber, as well. Simple slip-on rubber tips that slide over your carbide are generally available for about $10. Better yet, Black Diamond includes both carbide and rubber tips with its Distance and Pursuit series poles, which can be easily swapped out depending on your terrain choice.
Tip replacement is important to mention here, too. Traditionally, users can replace old, worn tips by tugging off the fitting at the bottom of the pole. Often glued on by the manufacturer and clogged with old dirt from the trail, this is much easier said than done. However, poles like Black Diamond aforementioned offerings have started innovating on this front: They offer screw-in tips that make replacement a breeze. Users can even screw in (instead of sliding on) a rubber tip for added security on pavement or rocks. We much prefer these to slip-on rubber tips, as they’re less likely to creep off and leave litter on the trail.
Nearly all trekking poles come with at least one set of removable plastic baskets attached to the base of the lower shaft. Small-diameter baskets are commonly known as trekking baskets or discs, and their primary function is to keep your poles from sinking into mud or sliding in between rocks while hiking (which could potentially damage the shaft). Some hikers and runners opt to remove these to streamline their setup. Wide-diameter baskets look just like ski models and are built for flotation in snow. Poles intended for four-season applications like snowshoeing, mountaineering, and splitboarding (like MSR’s DynaLock Ascent Carbon) will come with both trekking and snow baskets, while others offer snow baskets as a separate add-on.
The majority of trekking poles are adjustable or come in a few different sizes—or both—which means that most designs are available in lengths ranging from about 95 to 140 centimeters (roughly 35 to 55 in.). Do the math (or not), and what this means is that you’ll generally be able to find a trekking pole that fits your body, no matter what model you choose.
Manufacturers most commonly use height as the best indication for pole length, including Leki, which offers a handy Pole Length Advisor on their website. However, it’s important to note that different body proportions mean that pole length doesn’t always perfectly correlate with height. The best way to figure out your ideal trekking pole length is but your arms out at a right angle and measure the distance between your hands and the ground. And the good news is that, within a range, your body will adapt to the pole you end up choosing. We’ve used fixed-length poles (like the Black Diamond Distance Carbon Z) for years and feel very little need to tweak the length up or down.
It’s worth noting here that not all adjustable poles are created equal. For example, the Black Diamond Distance FLZ has about six inches of range, while the REI Co-op Flash Carbon has a whopping 14. If you anticipate sharing poles with your family members or are particularly short and know you need an extra-long pole for setting up your trekking pole shelter, make sure to consider the range of adjustability of a pole before purchasing. But for most users, 6 inches should be more than enough room to dial in a good fit.
While most trekking poles are unisex, too often, that “one-form-fits-all” dictum benefits men more than women. To remedy this, women’s-specific poles have several key differences. First, grips tend to run slightly smaller to accommodate smaller hand sizes. Second, lengths are a hair shorter than men’s versions. The women’s Leki Cressida Cork Lite, for example, extends from 90 to 125 centimeters, while the men's Makalu Cork Lite ranges from 100 to 135 centimeters. To be clear, women can use unisex trekking poles just fine. But the slight tweaks on women’s-specific poles can especially benefit smaller-in-stature women searching for shorter sticks.
The answer depends on your intended use and whether the extra investment in carbon fiber is worth it for you. Carbon is a high-performance material that keeps weight impressively low while maintaining excellent stiffness and decent durability. Aluminum, on the other hand, is less expensive to produce, often feels sturdier in hand, and is more likely to bend rather than break under stress—whereas carbon is prone to snapping.
Runners and anyone who values a low swing weight and barely-there feel over long days will benefit from ultralight carbon models like Black Diamond’s Distance Carbon Z (9.9 oz. per pair) or Durston’s Iceline (10.2 oz.). Aluminum poles typically weigh a pound or more per pair but are a better choice for traditional backpackers, those who are rough on gear, or anyone looking to save money. For example, swapping from the carbon to the aluminum version of the BD Distance Z adds about 3 ounces but saves you a significant $50 (for more, read our review of the aluminum BD Distance Z)
Trekking pole shelters are backpacking tents that utilize trekking poles to pitch a stable and weather-proof setup. There are three main considerations here for choosing the right pole.
The first is adjustability. Trekking pole shelters work best when you can tailor your pole to the demands of the terrain and the tent itself. Fixed-length poles, while lighter on the trail, won’t can’t cut it for setting up a solid shelter. The second is weight: Most people with trekking pole shelters are trying to shave weight—and this goes for trekking poles, too. Finally, it’s important to find a solid and durable pole. A too-skinny or brittle pole could spell disaster in the middle of the night. This is where shaft material plays a big role: Carbon is less durable than aluminum but a good bit lighter. So, trekking-pole shelter users face an inherent tradeoff: Focus on weight savings and get the lightest carbon pole they can find, or go a hair heavier with the aluminum? Generally, high-end carbon poles hold up great for trekking-pole shelter supports, but aluminum’s added peace of mind certainly doesn’t hurt.
Both adjustable and fixed-length trekking poles have a lot to offer. For the needs of most users, adjustable poles fit the bill. Due to their telescoping design, these poles tend to run a little cheaper than fixed-length poles and are sturdy and long-lived. What’s more, you can dial in exactly the right length for your body type and the terrain you’re on—and they’re the only type of pole we’d recommend for pitching a trekking pole shelter. The chief reason to go fixed-length (most fixed-length poles are folding in style—like the Black Diamond Distance Z) is weight savings and packed size. With less material overall, fixed-length poles can nearly cut your weight in half, and many drop over 10 inches off the packed size of adjustable poles. These are often ideal for mountain runners, ultralight backpackers, and others counting ounces on their expeditions.
The good news is that you can have your cake and eat it too. Poles like those from Black Diamond’s FLZ series (including the Pursuit FLZ and Distance FLZ) feature the low weight and packed size of a fixed-length, folding pole while adding a small amount of adjustability for those who need it. If you’re willing to spend up, these are la crème de la crème for ultralight enthusiasts who still want the versatility of an adjustable pole.
This is a question we love to answer. Our sustainability team did a deep dive into this category and came back with seven criteria for trekking poles, which span both the product and brand levels. REI Co-op's trekking poles perform the highest in our ratings due to their strong brand-level scores (responsible manufacuturing, reduced and recycled packaging, annual impact report, carbon footprint tracking)—headlined by the well-built and long-lasting REI Co-op Traverse (read the Traverse Sustainablity Report). However, it's worth noting that—unlike the Co-op's collection—Black Diamond's poles are made with recycled materials and come with a plethora of replacement parts. Every product on Better Trail gets a full sustainability analysis, which you can find by clicking the "Read Sustainability Report" button in each box above.
The vast majority of resort skiers have no need for an adjustable ski pole, meaning that most are one-piece designs that have no ability to collapse or adjust. What’s more, without a huge need to keep weight low, they prioritize durability and features far above counting ounces, including thick aluminum construction and large grips. Grip material also differs: Rubber grips are the material of choice for skiing since they don't absorb moisture. And finally, they’ll always come with a massive powder basket at the tip to keep the pole from sinking too deep in powder. Hypothetically, you could use a fixed-length ski pole for hiking, but most will find them to be overbuilt and burdensome to carry for long days on the trail.
Things get more ambiguous when it comes to comparing trekking poles and backcountry ski poles. Like trekking poles, most backcountry ski poles are telescoping, which allows skiers to adjust the length of their pole depending on the terrain (particularly helpful for uphill travel). But because skiers rarely have the need to stow their poles, these poles generally feature two telescoping sections rather than the three we’re used to seeing among trekking poles. This lends itself to a long packed size (around 35 to 40 in.), making them less attractive for hiking and backpacking. And like fixed-length ski poles, backcountry poles are generally a good bit heavier than trekking poles, due to burlier construction and add-on features, including longer choke-ups and larger grips that are purpose-built for clearing snow and transitioning bindings from ski to walk mode.
So that leaves one question remaining: Can you use your trekking poles for skiing? Our short answer is that we’d recommend against it. Four-season poles like the MSR Dynalock Ascent Carbon and Black Diamond Alpine Carbon Cork are stronger than your average carbon pole and designed for uphill travel in the snow (think mountaineering or splitboard ascents), but they’re not intended for the heavy forces encountered when traveling downhill on snow at high speeds. Plus, their foam and cork grips soak up moisture. It’s also worth noting the Black Diamond Traverse Compactor ($190), which has all the features we love in a Black Diamond ski pole but features a folding design that collapses down to 15.7 inches. However, the Traverse Compactor is heavier than all the trekking poles on our list at 1 pound 4.7 ounces.
Adventure
Mt. Waddington, Human-Powered
Sustainability
REI Co-op: Sustainability Spotlight
