Updated:
May 06, 2025Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Weight
1 lb. 3.4 oz.
Waterproof
No (WP available)
Upper
Synthetic
Outsole
Vibram TC5+
Pros
Cons
Merrell Moab Speed 2
The Merrell Moab Speed 2 impressed me with its comfort right out of the box. I’ve worn this shoe in Colorado’s La Plata mountains and Weminuche Wilderness, on trails around Moab, Utah, and up Mount Humphreys, the highest point in Arizona. The Speed 2 is roomy, soft, comfortable, and requires no break-in period. While the midsole is stiff, it’s not an issue on the trail thanks to plentiful cushioning and the Speed 2’s rockered shape, which promotes a natural stride and helps limit foot fatigue. I felt very secure and comfortable in the Speed 2—it's nearly as cushy as a trail running shoe such as the Hoka Speedgoat. One ding against it, though, is that even for a lightweight hiking shoe it feels clunky rather than nimble due to its large base (more on this below).
I feel supported and stable in the Speed 2, whether I’m on a casual hike or tackling a steep, challenging trail. It offers a well-balanced foundation—significantly more stable than a trail runner, but not as reinforced as a traditional hiking shoe such as the Merrell Moab 3 or Keen Targhee IV (read our Targhee IV review). The Speed 2 features a proprietary integrated plate that runs underfoot, from the heel to partway up the forefoot and slightly up the sides. This design adds a healthy boost in stiffness compared to a typical trail runner, striking the right balance between torsional stability and flexibility for fast hiking (particularly at the ball of the foot).
Overall, the Speed 2 felt reliable as I made my way across boulder fields and down uneven trails, and most hikers will find it plenty stable for backcountry routes. While I only wore this shoe for hiking adventures, I have no doubt it can handle the weight of a backpacking pack with ease (something other Better Trail testers have found wearing the Moab Speed 2 on backpacking trips that featured a mix of on- and off-trail travel).
The Moab Speed 2’s traction is reliably grippy. Its Vibram TC5+ outsole sports aggressive, 4-millimeter lugs that are smartly spaced and sticky. I’ve worn this shoe on moderate and strenuous hikes in Silverton, Colorado, that feature steep, rocky sections and boulder fields and the Speed 2 handled the terrain with ease—it performed even better than my zero-drop Altra trail shoes, which offer better ground feel.
Although we didn’t get a chance to test this version of the Speed 2 on slick trails, we’ve used the Speed 2 Mid—which has the exact same outsole materials and design—in wet conditions. The outsole offered solid traction on wet slickrock, but the relatively shallow lug depth can cause slippage in mud. Also, it’s important to note that the Vibram TC5+ outsole is softer than Vibram’s popular Megagrip compound (found on shoes like the Topo Athletic Traverse; see our Traverse review) and will therefore wear out faster, making the Speed 2’s traction less dependable over time.
After over 50 miles of trail use thus far, the Speed 2 has held up well, giving me confidence that it will survive more than a few hiking seasons. The tread hasn’t noticeably worn down, and the abrasion-resistant heel and toe cap have proven durable so far. Although the mesh upper doesn’t offer the same level of toughness as leather, aside from a nice sheen of dirt there’s no excessive wear. Once it’s past its lifespan, I can see myself purchasing the Speed 2 again in the future.
There is a caveat to this shoe, however. While our low-top Speed 2 is holding up well, we’ve had some issues with the mid-height boot version, which shares the same construction as the low-top but with more ankle protection. After 50 miles of use in the rocky, sandy desert environment of the Grand Canyon, parts of the Speed 2 Mid’s exposed midsole foam is tearing off, and the suede overlays on the side are pilling (for more, read our Moab Speed 2 Mid review). Given their similarities, this raises some concerns about the longevity of the low-top Speed 2.
The Speed 2 offers average foot protection for a lighter-weight hiking shoe. While it has more armor than most trail runners, it’s not as burly as Merrell’s popular—and burlier—Moab 3. This shoe is designed with a TPU toe cap that can dull the pain when you stub a toe, but the TPU isn’t as protective as a rubber toe cap. The heel also has the same TPU reinforcement, and the ankle is only lightly protected by padding. That said, the Speed 2’s cushioned midsole and midfoot plate readily handle anything sharp underfoot—I barely notice what’s beneath my feet when I hike. This excellent underfoot protection also helps reduce foot fatigue during long outings.
Select icon to view details:
Longevity
Choosing durable outdoor gear is perhaps the most effective way to reduce environmental impact—the longer it lasts, the less it needs to be produced. Our proprietary longevity rating evaluates overall build quality based on factors such as materials, fabric denier, component durability (including zippers and toggles), real-world performance as reported by our field testers, and our experiences with the brand.
Recycled Materials
This product is made partly or entirely from recycled materials, the most common being nylon, polyester, wool, and down. Some products include a single recycled component or partially recycled fabric, while others are 100% recycled (generally excluding accessories like zippers, Velcro, toggles, etc). Look for these details in our product sustainability report linked below.
Bluesign Approved
Bluesign Technologies, based in Switzerland, operates a third-party textile certification system that ensures materials are manufactured to strict environmental, chemical, and worker safety standards. A Bluesign-approved material indicates that it has undergone a rigorous vetting process based on the criteria above. A Bluesign Product goes the next mile, containing at least 90% Bluesign-approved fabrics and at least 30% Bluesign-approved accessories.
Responsible Manufacturing
This criterion evaluates this brand's commitment to fair wages, safe working conditions, and reducing its environmental impact throughout the production process. Responsible manufacturing is most commonly demonstrated through certifications and membership in programs such as Fair Trade Certified, Fair Wear Foundation, Worldwide Responsible Accreditation of Production, and the Fair Labor Association. We also recognize brands that prioritize local production, such as those that manufacture primarily in the United States or Europe, to reduce carbon emissions, maintain better oversight of working conditions, and comply with strict social and environmental regulations.
Recycled and/or Reduced Packaging
This brand uses recycled packaging and/or is making efforts to reduce packaging altogether. For example, it may use a certain percentage of recycled cardboard or make efforts to use less plastic across its packaging operation. In some cases, brands also use Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper products, which helps to ensure sustainable sourcing of forest materials.
Resale and/or Recycling Services
This brand has a resale and/or recycling program, which helps keep gear in circulation for longer and out of landfills. The most common form is a trade-in program, where consumers can exchange items for store credit, which is then resold. Some brands accept products back for recycling at the end of their life, thereby reducing waste. Occasionally, some do both.
Carbon Footprint Tracking
This criterion evaluates whether this brand measures its greenhouse gas emissions, along with its commitment to reduction and transparency in reporting. Typically, we require brands to follow established frameworks such as the Higg Index, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, or The Change Climate Project. Generally, companies use the widely recognized scope categorization system for measuring brand emissions.
Annual Impact Report
This brand produces and publishes an annual impact report for public consumption, tracking its environmental footprint and sustainability efforts. These reports vary in form but generally cover topics such as material sourcing, greenhouse gas and emissions tracking, waste and water usage, supply chain analysis, and packaging efforts. An impact report is an important step toward transparency and accountability on the sustainability front.
The Speed 2 offers an impressive blend of comfort and support for a shoe that only weighs 1 pound 3.4 ounces (women’s pair of the non-waterproof version). For reference, that’s only an ounce or so heavier than a popular trail runner like the Hoka Speedgoat. And it’s closely in line with other popular lightweight shoes like the Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX (1 lb. 8.8 oz.) and Salomon’s X Ultra 4 (1 lb. 6.2 oz.). The only knock that we have in relation to weight with the Moab Speed is that its wide base and thick midsole give it a somewhat clunky feel on the trail. This isn’t a rock-hopping and break-out-into-a-run kind of design. But as long as you’re looking for a hiking shoe (rather than a trail runner), the Moab Speed 2 won’t hold you back.
Waterproof Liner
The Moab Speed 2 low-top shoe is offered with a waterproof Gore-Tex liner for $170, but I tested the non-waterproof version ($140) in mid-summer temperatures throughout Colorado, Utah, and Arizona. It proved to be a great decision: In these conditions, with temps reaching the mid-80s on one day on the Colorado Trail, the Speed 2’s mesh upper offered excellent breathability—it’s a much better venter than a leather design or a shoe with a waterproof liner.
The Speed 2 in a women’s 7.5 fit my size 7.5-to-8 feet wonderfully. As someone with flat feet and low arches, I usually gravitate towards hiking shoes with minimal arch support, whether zero-drop or highly cushioned designs, and many models tend to be too narrow and uncomfortable for me. However, the Speed 2 didn’t present that issue—its toe box is roomy enough to accommodate my wide feet, the fit around the arch is snug and secure without any excess pressure, and the heel doesn’t slip and is comfortably padded. Other Better Trail testers have noted the roomy fit can be an issue for those with narrow feet, but it worked very well for me.
Merrell Moab 3 WP ($140): The Traditional Best-Seller
The Speed’s more traditional sibling, the Moab 3, is widely loved for its sturdy design that’s high on comfort and built to last. With a leather upper, rubber heel and toe caps, and thick Vibram TC5+ outsole, it’s sturdier, more durable, and offers more protection on all sides. It’s also $30 cheaper. In contrast, the Speed 2 feels more athletic, with a lighter, more breathable, and rockered design, and it has a more modern look overall. Both are supportive and comfortable shoes from one of the most popular names in hiking footwear, and your final decision will come down to personal preference and speed. For more, read our Merrell Moab 3 review.
Salomon X Ultra 5 GTX ($170): Stable and Tough
The Salomon X Ultra 5 is built for control and precision, with a stiff chassis, secure lacing system, and snug, low-volume fit that excels on technical trails and under the weight of a pack. It’s a shoe that feels planted on uneven terrain, offering standout support and protection for rugged day hikes or lightweight backpacking. Compared to the Merrell Moab Speed 2, the X Ultra is noticeably firmer and more locked-in, while the Merrell prioritizes step-in comfort and a softer, roomier feel that’s better suited to casual hikers or moderate trails. For a deeper dive, see our X Ultra 5 review.
Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX ($180): More Cushion, Less Agility
The Merrell Moab Speed 2 and Hoka Anacapa 2 Low GTX both aim to balance hiking support with trail-running comfort, but they prioritize different strengths. The Anacapa 2 offers plush cushioning and a smooth, rockered stride that excels on well-maintained trails—perfect for hikers prone to sore feet or logging long miles on easier terrain. The Moab Speed 2, by contrast, is more agile and better suited to varied terrain, with a firmer ride, better precision, and a more trail-ready outsole. For all-day comfort on mellow trails, go Hoka; for versatility and technical capability, stick with the Merrell. If you'd like more information, see our Anacapa 2 Low review.
An approachable design, the Moab Speed 2 combines hiking-shoe-like stability and support with the low weight and rockered style of a trail running shoe. It's comfortable out of the box and adept both on and off-trail. However, it lacks the performance fit and agility you’d get with a trail runner.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Merrell’s traditional hiking shoe features plush padding for comfort, a durable and protective leather upper, and a stiff build that can easily forge its way through most terrain. It’ll last significantly longer than most lightweight synthetic hiking shoes. However, it’s too heavy and clunky for many modern hikers.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Salomon’s popular lightweight hiker offers a nice balance of agility, protection, and durability for everything from easy trails to cross-country travel. It’s not as soft and cushioned as a trail runner, and the fit runs narrow, but it’s otherwise a top all-around performer.
Comfort
Support and Stability
Traction
Durability
Foot Protection
Sustainability
Merrell’s Moab Speed 2 has become one of our go-to shoe recommendations for folks who want a modern, lightweight design for anything from long single-day outings to overnight trips. Stability and comfort are its two standout features, and this shoe generally feels great on your feet. We’d confidently take this shoe out on rugged hikes, and it’s stylish enough for post-hike wandering around town—always a nice bonus. We find its price well worth the spend, though we’d still keep an eye on this shoe’s longevity based on our disappointing experience with the Speed 2 Mid. That said, Merrell recently released a new variation of the Speed 2 with a leather upper, which very well might address the durability complaint… Sounds like we have some more gear to test.
hit the trail
Gear Guide
Best Hiking Shoes of 2025Sustainability
About Our Sustainability RatingsGear Guide
Best Down Jackets of 2025