Interior Space
Weight & Packed Size
Weather Protection
Durability
Ease of Use
Sustainability
Type
Semi-freestanding
Packaged weight
3 lb. 8 oz.
Floor dimensions
85 x 52/43 in.
Capacity
2P (3P)
Pros
Cons
Nemo Mayfly Osmo 2
With almost 28 square feet of space in a tapered floorplan (43 in. at the feet, 52 in. at the head), the Nemo Mayfly Osmo 2 tent can accommodate two regular-sized (20-in. wide) sleeping pads. The ridge pole and arching, pre-bent main pole significantly increase the tent’s height both at the head and throughout, allowing me to sit fully upright without my head hitting the ceiling. (I’m 5-foot 6 inches tall and could change a shirt without having to scrunch.) This design (along with the 42-inch peak height) makes the Mayfly feel larger on the interior than my Big Agnes Tiger Wall, which has a 39-inch peak height and doesn’t use a pre-bent pole.
I slept solo in the Mayfly while on a backpacking trip with friends in Washington State’s Enchantments. While the tent provided a generous amount of space for one, adding another person would have been tight. The tent’s tapered floorplan also makes it inconvenient to sleep head-to-toe with a tentmate. And if you or your tentmate has a penchant for rectangular, wide-sized sleeping pads (which measure 25 in. across), this isn’t the tent for you—they’ll fit at the head, but will have to overlap at the foot. Overall, the Mayfly is manageable for two people traveling with lightweight sleeping gear, but certainly not as spacious as a trekking pole shelter or untapered tents like the REI Co-op Trail Hut 2 (read our Trail Hut review) or Half Dome SL 2+.
Although Nemo classifies the Mayfly as a lightweight backpacking tent, it’s objectively hefty compared to other semi-freestanding designs. At 3 pounds 8 ounces, it weighs a pound (or more) heavier than Big Agnes’ Tiger Wall and Fly Creek and is even heavier than Big Agnes’ fully freestanding Copper Spur (3 lb.). That said, the extra ounces are put to good use in the form of increased durability and—when compared with the semi-freestanding models—slightly more interior space due to the extra headroom.
The Mayfly packs down to roughly 6.5 by 19.5 inches, which is larger than the Copper Spur (4.5 x 19.5 in.) and Tiger Wall (5 x 18 in.). Some will appreciate the way Nemo’s square-shaped stuff sack fits into their backpacking pack; those who routinely store their tent on the outside of their ultralight backpack might object. For my purposes, I was able to easily fit the Mayfly inside my 65-liter Osprey Ariel backpack along with my other sleeping gear, layers, and four days' worth of food. For solo backpacking trips, most people will want something slightly lighter, but if you’re sharing the weight (the Divvy Cube stuff sack is built so that the poles and tent can be split up), the Mayfly is a good option.
I tested the Mayfly in a range of trying weather conditions, notably on early-summer trips in Washington State’s Glacier Peak Wilderness and its smaller Enchantment range. In all types of moisture, the Mayfly fared well thanks to its Osmo rainfly and 68-denier PU ripstop floor (note: this floor is much thicker than that of most competitors—for reference, the Big Agnes Tiger Wall’s floor is 15D). Nemo’s proprietary Osmo fabric uses a poly-nylon blend that the company claims has longer-lasting waterproofing than similar materials and stretches minimally when wet (one-third that of other nylon flys). In practice, I had nothing to complain about: While camping on snow, the bathtub floor valiantly kept moisture out, even without a ground cloth; when the skies unleashed high in the Enchantments’ “core zone,” the rainfly prevented any rain or moisture from entering the tent and was still taut in the morning.
However, the strong winds my group encountered while camping in the Enchantments revealed a significant weak point in the Mayfly’s performance. The rainfly attaches to the tent by inserting a pin into a slot at each corner and then twisting until the pin is perpendicular to the slot. Without wind, this system works well; but during the heavy winds I experienced, the pins came out of their slots several times throughout the night, which resulted in a detached (and very loud and flapping) rainfly. I also noticed that the rainfly’s cord locks loosened in the wind, likely contributing to the pin-and-slot attachments coming undone. I wouldn’t wish this kind of sleepless night on anyone, and would only recommend the Mayfly for lower-elevation and sheltered campsites.
The Mayfly features a 68-denier PU ripstop floor, which is much more substantial than most ultralight tent floors (the average is around 15 to 20D). The floor felt remarkably sturdy without a ground cloth (Nemo does offer a 70D footprint for $70) and I did not experience any abrasions or snagging when camped on granite and at forest campsites with pokey sticks and rocks. Similarly, the no-see-um mesh fabric on the tent body felt durable without being too heavy, and you get an average amount of nylon on the tent body (more than a mesh-heavy tent like the Big Agnes Fly Creek), which is arguably more long-lasting than mesh. Nemo does not provide a denier for the Osmo rainfly fabric as it’s made with two different fibers, but it felt significantly more robust than my Tiger Wall’s 15-denier rainfly (for more, read the Tiger Wall UL2 review).
Although the Mayfly did not perform well in high winds, the lightweight aluminum poles exceeded my expectations. I’ve had carbon poles snap on me, so it was a relief to see that the aluminum poles barely bent in the strong gusts (I was happy to have the included repair splint just in case). Overall, the Mayfly is sturdier than most semi-freestanding tents, which is one of the key benefits of its heavier-than-average design.
I found the setup process for the Mayfly Osmo 2 intuitive and easy to do on my own. The tent pitches with one main Y-shaped pole and a ridge pole, and mercifully has color-coded webbing and pole ends to serve as guides. The ends of the poles have metal balls (dubbed “Axial corner anchors”) that snap into place at the tent’s corners—a surprisingly satisfying experience. However, I noticed that snow or small pebbles tended to get into these sockets, which I then had to clean out to get the tent pole to snap in securely. The rainfly is anchored to the tent using the combination of a pin and slot, which I detailed in the Weather Protection section above. My initial take on this hardware was that it was cool, innovative, and fun to use—but after a windy night that forced me out of my tent multiple times to reattach the fly, it lost its appeal.
Because the Mayfly is semi-freestanding, you have to stake out the two corners at the foot for the tent to be fully set up. Several guylines can also staked out to create more stability in heavy winds. This does require good anchors, which were hard for me to find while camping on granite slabs and in the snow. I had to make deadmans (buried anchors in the snow) and scavenge for small boulders, making the setup process long and onerous. This is one of the primary downsides of a semi-freestanding backpacking tent; as a result, I’d recommend the Mayfly for those who stick to campsites with good ground anchors (read: dirt), but it’s not a great pairing for hikers who frequent above-treeline areas where they’ll be camping on rock and snow.
Select icon to view details:
Longevity
Choosing durable outdoor gear is perhaps the most effective way to reduce environmental impact—the longer it lasts, the less it needs to be produced. Our proprietary longevity rating evaluates overall build quality based on factors such as materials, fabric denier, component durability (including zippers and toggles), real-world performance as reported by our field testers, and our experiences with the brand.
PFAS-Free DWR
This product’s DWR (Durable Water Repellent) finish is made without per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances (PFAS). These synthetic compounds are known as "forever chemicals” because they take an extremely long time to degrade, if at all. PFAS can eventually end up in everything from soil to drinking water and have been linked to a range of health issues.
Recycled Materials
This product is made partly or entirely from recycled materials, the most common being nylon, polyester, wool, and down. Some products include a single recycled component or partially recycled fabric, while others are 100% recycled (generally excluding accessories like zippers, Velcro, toggles, etc). Look for these details in our product sustainability report linked below.
Bluesign Approved
Bluesign Technologies, based in Switzerland, is a third-party textile certification system that ensures materials are manufactured to strict environmental and worker safety standards. A Bluesign-approval denotes that some of the product’s materials have gone through a rigorous vetting process. A Bluesign Product goes the next mile: These contain more than 90% Bluesign-approved fabrics and more than 20% Bluesign-approved accessories.
Solution-Dyed Materials
Solution dyeing is a process in which pigment is added to a synthetic fiber’s raw materials during production instead of after. Compared to traditional methods, solution dyeing reduces water consumption, energy use, and carbon dioxide emissions, and releases fewer chemicals overall. In addition to these environmental benefits, solution-dyed fabrics resist fading because the fiber’s pigment becomes intrinsic to it, rather than being dyed on the surface.
Responsible Manufacturing
This criterion evaluates this brand's commitment to fair wages, safe working conditions, and reducing its environmental impact throughout the production process. Responsible manufacturing is most commonly demonstrated through certifications and membership in programs such as Fair Trade Certified, Fair Wear Foundation, Worldwide Responsible Accreditation of Production, and the Fair Labor Association. We also recognize brands that prioritize local production, such as those that manufacture primarily in the United States or Europe, to reduce carbon emissions, maintain better oversight of working conditions, and comply with strict social and environmental regulations.
Recycled and/or Reduced Packaging
This brand uses recycled packaging and/or is making efforts to reduce packaging altogether. For example, it may use a certain percentage of recycled cardboard or make efforts to use less plastic across its packaging operation. In some cases, brands also use Forest Stewardship Council-certified paper products, which helps to ensure sustainable sourcing of forest materials.
Repair Services
This brand offers repair services, which can extend this product's lifespan and reduce overall consumption. Some brands offer comprehensive repair programs that can fix a wide range of issues, while others have more limited capabilities. If a brand's warranty policy only covers replacement, rather than repair, these programs usually do not meet this criterion.
Resale and/or Recycling Services
This brand has a resale and/or recycling program, which helps keep gear in circulation for longer and out of landfills. The most common form is a trade-in program, where consumers can exchange items for store credit, which is then resold. Some brands accept products back for recycling at the end of their life, thereby reducing waste. Occasionally, some do both.
Carbon Footprint Tracking
This criterion evaluates whether this brand measures its greenhouse gas emissions, along with its commitment to reduction and transparency in reporting. Typically, we require brands to follow established frameworks such as the Higg Index, Greenhouse Gas Protocol, or The Change Climate Project. Generally, companies use the widely recognized scope categorization system for measuring brand emissions.
Annual Impact Report
This brand produces and publishes an annual impact report for public consumption, tracking its environmental footprint and sustainability efforts. These reports vary in form but generally cover topics such as material sourcing, greenhouse gas and emissions tracking, waste and water usage, supply chain analysis, and packaging efforts. An impact report is an important step toward transparency and accountability on the sustainability front.
With its double-wall design, the mesh body of the Nemo Mayfly Osmo allows for great ventilation and moisture control. Nemo also included a strut vent above each vestibule door to prop open to increase airflow. On a clear night, the rainfly can be tied back on each vestibule door. Unlike some other tents I’ve used, Nemo designed the Mayfly with non-mesh fabric on the door, which allows for slightly more privacy but does have a slight negative impact on ventilation. I’ve noticed no ventilation issues while sleeping solo in the tent; while sharing it with my climbing partner at the Glacier Peak basecamp, propping open the vents seemed to do the trick.
Interior Storage
The Mayfly includes one very generously sized pocket overhead that can hold large items—I used it to store my base layer, kindle, and a couple of other small items. There is also a smaller rectangular pocket on the wall behind that head, where I kept my phone and charger a bit closer in reach. The Mayfly also features a pair of Nemo’s unique nightlight pockets, made with orange material to dampen the light of a headlamp and create a nice ambient glow. Though I appreciated the large pockets, I wish the Mayfly had pockets closer to the bathtub floor for easier access without having to sit up.
Vestibules
The Mayfly’s two vestibules (7.1 sq. ft. each) accommodated my 65-liter backpack and hiking shoes. While my backpack was completely covered by the rainfly, it was a close fit—one rainy night, mud splashed under the fly and onto my pack. For comparison’s sake, these vestibules are slightly smaller than those of many competitors (including the Big Agnes Tiger Wall), which are generally about 8 square feet.
Nemo Dagger Osmo 2 ($500): Maximize Your Backcountry Comfort
The Nemo Dagger Osmo is a step up in comfort from the Mayfly with the price tag to prove it. Unlike the Mayfly, the Dagger is a freestanding tent (the corners of the foot end are pole-supported vs. the single pole running down the spine of the Mayfly), which translates to more versatility in choosing a campsite and an overall more stable and roomy build. It also prioritizes comfort with a rectangular floorplan—significantly wider than the Mayfly at the foot—more headroom throughout, and roomy vestibules (11.4 sq. ft. each compared to the Mayfly’s 7.1 sq. ft.). Surprisingly, the Dagger is only 7 ounces heavier than the Mayfly thanks to a thinner fabric set. We think the Mayfly offers a better balance of durability and weight, but the Dagger is a great option for comfort-seeking backpackers who still want to travel relatively light. For a deeper dive, see our Nemo Dagger Osmo 2P review.
Big Agnes Copper Spur UL2 ($550): Better Space-to-Weight Ratio
Big Agnes’ Copper Spur is one of the most well-rounded backpacking tents ever made and thus is a great gold standard against which to compare the Mayfly. For 3 pounds (a half-pound lighter than the Mayfly), the Copper Spur features a freestanding design, which is more stable in high winds and won’t require you to hem and haw over your campsite—just set the tent up on rock, snow, or dirt, and it’ll stand on its own. The weight savings and freestanding design are enough to warrant the $150 price bump, which will be worth it for backpackers wanting the top-shelf combination of space-to-weight. However, the Copper Spur’s thinner fabrics (15D and 20D) will require extra care. For more, read our review of the Big Agnes Copper Spur UL2.
While the Mayfly ranks a tad below Nemo and other brands’ premium ultralight offerings, this tent still has much to offer. It’s durable, competitively priced, exceptionally waterproof, and light enough for most backpacking trips. However, it performs poorly in wind and doesn’t offer a good space-to-weight ratio.
Interior Space
Weight & Packed Size
Weather Protection
Durability
Ease of Use
Sustainability
The Nemo Dagger is made for hikers who want to max out backcountry comfort. The tent doesn’t levy too harsh of a weight tax, considering the room it provides, and it’s a well-constructed model. Its high price tag would fit better on a lighter design, though.
Interior Space
Weight & Packed Size
Weather Protection
Durability
Ease of Use
Sustainability
Our favorite do-it-all backpacking tent, the Copper Spur, gets a welcome update for 2025. It’s now even lighter, with updated fabrics and the same accommodating dimensions. Yes, its price is hard to swallow, but this tent won’t let you down.
Interior Space
Weight & Packed Size
Weather Protection
Durability
Ease of Use
Sustainability
The Nemo Mayfly is a bit of a curious tent in terms of where it sits within the greater market. Its main calling card is that it’s more durable than most backpacking tents of similar weight, with a 68-denier floor (most 3-lb. tents run around 15D to 20D) and an Osmo fly that’s reliably waterproof and does not sag when wet like other forms of nylon. As a result, it makes an intriguing option for practical backpackers looking for a great combination of price, durability, and weight savings, as long as you know what you’re getting with the semi-freestanding design (it isn’t ideal in serious wind or on rocky terrain). There are certainly lighter tents with similar amounts of interior space, but for its price and longevity, the Mayfly has carved out a small niche for itself within a competitive market.
get outside in comfort
Gear Guide
Best Backpacking Tents of 2025Gear Guide
Best Backpacking Sleeping Pads of 2025Gear Guide
Best Backpacking Backpacks of 2025Gear Guide
Best Trekking Poles of 2025Gear Guide
Best Down Jackets of 2025